Cambridge Catalogue  
  • Help
Home > Catalogue > Political Journalism in Comparative Perspective
Political Journalism in Comparative Perspective

Details

  • 31 b/w illus. 11 tables
  • Page extent: 264 pages
  • Size: 216 x 138 mm
  • Weight: 0.32 kg

Paperback

 (ISBN-13: 9781107674608)

Political journalism is often under fire. Conventional wisdom and much scholarly research suggest that journalists are cynics and political pundits. Political news is void of substance and overly focused on strategy and persons. Citizens do not learn from the news, are politically cynical, and are dissatisfied with the media. This book challenges these assumptions, which are often based on single-country studies with limited empirical observations about the relation between news production, content, and journalism's effects. Based on interviews with journalists, a systematic content analysis of political news, and panel survey data in different countries, this book tests how different systems and media-politics relations condition the contents of political news. It shows how different content creates different effects and demonstrates that under the right circumstances citizens learn from political news, do not become cynical, and are satisfied with political journalism.

• Systematic cross-national comparative analysis • A comprehensive project using media content analyses and panel surveys • Studies production, content, and effects of political journalism

Contents

1. Introduction; 2. Comparing political journalism; 3. Journalists: the people behind the headlines; 4. Journalists and politicians: a troubled relationship; 5. Do role conceptions matter?; 6. What type of journalism produces public knowledge?; 7. Does infotainment journalism lead to political cynicism? The effects of privatization versus personalization in the news; 8. Good journalism, satisfied citizens? How perceived watchdog reporting affects satisfaction with political coverage; 9. Political journalism: today and tomorrow.

Prize Winner

Goldsmith Book Prize, Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy 2016 - Winner

Review

'This book is a best-practice example of comparative research on news and political communication. By combining journalist surveys, content analyses, and panel surveys, it follows the entire political communication process in four countries. It demonstrates that different conditions create different kinds of political journalism, and it identifies those conditions most favorable to democratic news performance. This is an extremely informed, compellingly argued, and insightful assessment of political journalism in Europe. Moreover, it sets a new standard in comparative media research.' Frank Esser, Universität Zürich

printer iconPrinter friendly version AddThis