Cambridge Catalogue  
  • Help
Home > Catalogue > Thought and World
Thought and World


  • Page extent: 168 pages
  • Size: 228 x 152 mm
  • Weight: 0.42 kg

Library of Congress

  • Dewey number: 121
  • Dewey version: 21
  • LC Classification: BC181 .H55 2002
  • LC Subject headings:
    • Truth
    • Proposition (Logic)
    • Semantics (Philosophy)

Library of Congress Record


 (ISBN-13: 9780521814843 | ISBN-10: 0521814847)

There is an important family of semantic notions that we apply to thoughts and to the conceptual constituents of thoughts - as when we say that the thought that the Universe is expanding is true. Thought and World presents a theory of the content of such notions. The theory is largely deflationary in spirit, in the sense that it represents a broad range of semantic notions - including the concept of truth - as being entirely free from substantive metaphysical and empirical presuppositions. At the same time, however, it takes seriously and seeks to explain the intuition that there is a metaphysically or empirically 'deep' relation (a relation of mirroring or semantic correspondence) linking thoughts to reality. Thus, the theory represents a kind of compromise between deflationism and versions of the correspondence theory of truth. This book will appeal to students and professionals interested in the philosophy of logic and language.

• Gives a novel, detailed account of substitutional quantification • The clear, uncluttered presentation and elegant style make it ideal for use in graduate courses • Presents a new deflationary account of truth


1. Introduction; 2. Truth in the realm of thoughts; 3. The marriage of heaven and hell: reconciling deflationary semantics with correspondence intuitions; 4. Indexical representation and deflationary semantics; 5. Why meaning matters; 6. Into the wild blue yonder: non-designating concepts, vagueness, semantic paradox, and logical paradox.


'Hill's excellent Thought and World is a highly readable and important defence of a form of deflationism … it deserves, and will no dout receive, careful study.' The Philosophical Quarterly

printer iconPrinter friendly version AddThis