Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 55
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
July 2014
Print publication year:
2014
Online ISBN:
9781139644037

Book description

Phase Theory is the latest empirical and conceptual innovation in syntactic theory within the Chomskyan generative tradition. Adopting a cross-linguistic perspective, this book provides an introduction to Phase Theory, tracing the development of phases in minimalist syntax. It reviews both empirical and theoretical arguments in favor of phases, and examines the role phases play at the interface with semantics and phonology. Analyzing current phasehood diagnostics, it applies them in a systematic fashion to a broad range of syntactic categories, both phases and non-phases. It concludes with a discussion of some of the more contentious issues in Phase Theory, involving cross-linguistic variation with respect to phasehood and the dynamic versus static nature of phases.

Reviews

‘The future has arrived! Modern syntactic theorizing now has its own up-to-date manual. Citko does an excellent service to the field with this superb, much needed introduction to Phase Theory.'

Kleanthes K. Grohmann - University of Cyprus

‘In this comprehensive critical survey that clearly explains and evaluates a core theoretical concept, Citko addresses the history, empirical motivations, and current uses of the phase. A hugely useful resource.'

David Adger - Queen Mary, University of London

'Comprehensive and well written, Citko’s book is an excellent state-of-the-art review of the notion of phases in the Minimalist Program. Readers will have a very clear idea of why phases have become such a hotly discussed issue and feel enticed to participate in the debate. The book is a must-read reference not only for students being acquainted with Minimalism, but to anyone interested in current syntactic theory and the syntax-semantics and syntax-phonology interfaces.'

Jairo Nunes - Universidade de São Paulo

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Abels, Klaus. 2003. ‘Successive Cyclicity, Antilocality and Adposition Stranding.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Abney, Steven P. 1987. ‘The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Abraham, Werner. 2010. ‘Misleading Homonymies, Economical PPs in Microvariation, and P as a Probe.’ In Mapping Spatial PPs, ed. G. Cinque & L. Rizzi, 261–94. Oxford University Press.
Adger, David. 2003. Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford University Press.
Adger, David. 2007. ‘Stress and Phasal Syntax.’ Linguistic Analysis 33: 238–66.
Adger, David & Gillian Ramchand. 2003. ‘Predication and Equation.’ Linguistic Inquiry 34: 325–59.
Adger, David & Peter Svenonius. 2011. ‘Features in Minimalist Syntax.’ In The Oxford Handbook of Minimalist Syntax, ed. C. Boeckx, 27–51. Oxford University Press.
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2009. ‘You Have the Right to Remain Silent: The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis.’ Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of Brussels.
Agüero-Bautista, Calixto. 2001. ‘Cyclicity and the Scope of Wh-Phrases.’ Doctoral disseration, MIT.
Aissen, Judith. 1996. ‘Pied-Piping, Abstract Agreement, and Functional Projections in Tzotzil.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 447–91.
Aldridge, Edith. 2005. ‘Phase Theory Account of Absolutive Extraction in Tagalog.’ In Perspectives on Phases, ed. M. McGinnis & N. Richards, 1–28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Aldridge, Edith. 2010. ‘Clause-internal Wh-movement in Archaic Chinese.’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19: 1–36.
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2001. ‘The Subject-in-Situ Generalization and the Role of Case in Driving Computations.’ Linguistic Inquiry 32: 193–231.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Bachrach, Asaf & Roni Katzir. 2007. ‘Spelling out QR.’ Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, ed. E. Puig-Waldmüller, 63–75. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Bachrach, Asaf & Roni Katzir. 2009. ‘Right Node Raising and Delayed Spell-Out.’ In Interphases: Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. K. K. Grohmann, 283–316. Oxford University Press.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 2001. ‘On Scrambling: A Reply to Bošković and Takahashi.’ Linguistic Inquiry 32: 635–58.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 2009. ‘What’s inside VP? New Evidence on VP Internal Structure in Russian.’ Paper presented at FASL 18, Cornell University.
Bailyn, John Frederick & Barbara Citko. 1999. ‘Case and Agreement in Slavic Predicates.’ In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 7: The Seattle Meeting 1998, ed. K. Dziwirek, H. Coates & C. Vakareliyska, 17–39. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Bailyn, John Frederick & Edward Rubin. 1991. ‘The Unification of Instrumental Case Assignment in Russian.’ Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 99–126.
Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Mark C. 2008a. ‘The Macroparameter in a Microparametric World.’ In The Limits of Syntactic Variation, ed. T. Biberauer, 351–74. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Mark C. 2008b. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts. 1989. ‘Passive Arguments Raised.’ Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–51.
Baltin, Mark R. 1987. ‘Do Antecedent-Contained Deletions Exist?Linguistic Inquiry 18: 579–95.
Barros, Mathew & Luis Vicente. 2010. ‘Right Node Raising Requires Both Multidominance and Ellipsis.’ Handout from a talk given at the 34th Penn Linguistics Colloquium.
Barrs, Andrew. 1986. ‘Chains and Anaphoric Dependence.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Barrs, Andrew 2001. ‘Syntactic Reconstruction Effects.’ In The Handbook of Syntactic Theory, ed. M. Baltin & C. Collins, 670–96. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Barss, Andrew & Howard Lasnik. 1986. ‘A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects.’ Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–54.
Belletti, Adriana. 1988. ‘The Case of Unaccusatives.’ Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1–34.
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1988. ‘Psych-Verbs and Θ-Theory.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352.
Bernstein, Judy. 1993. ‘Topics in the Syntax of Nominal Structure across Romance.’ Doctoral dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center.
Bernstein, Judy. 2001a. ‘The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain.’ In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, ed. M. Baltin & C. Collins, 536–61. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Bernstein, Judy. 2001b. ‘Focusing the “Right” Way in Romance Determiner Phrases.’ Probus 13: 1–29.
Bernstein, Judy. 2008. ‘Reformulating the Determiner Phrase Analysis.’ Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 1246–70.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005. ‘Long Distance Agreement in Hindi–Urdu.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 757–807.
Biberauer, Theresa (ed.). 2008. The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan. 2010. Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Biskup, Petr. 2009a. ‘The Phase Model and Adverbials.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Leipzig.
Biskup, Petr. 2009b. ‘The Syntactic Structure of PPs.’ In Czech in Formal Grammar, ed. M. Dočekal & M. Ziková, 9–29. Munich: Lincom.
Bittner, Maria & Ken Hale. 1996. ‘The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement.’ Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–67.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2003. ‘Floating Quantifiers: Handle With Care.’ In The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book, ed. L. Cheng & R. Sybesma, 107–48. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Dianne Jonas. 1996. ‘Subject Positions and the Roles of TP.’ Linguistic Inquiry 27: 195–236.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Susi Wurmbrand. 2005. ‘The Domain of Agreement.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 809–65.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2001. ‘Scope Reconstruction and A-Movement.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 503–48.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2006. Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008a. Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-Distance Dependencies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008b. Bare Syntax. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2012. Syntactic Islands. Cambridge University Press.
Boeckx, Cedric & Kleanthes K. Grohmann 2003. Multiple Wh-Fronting. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Boeckx, Cedric & Kleanthes K. Grohmann 2007. ‘Remark: Putting Phases in Perspective.’ Syntax 10: 204–22.
Booij, Geert & Jerzy Rubach. 1987. ‘Postcyclic versus Postlexical Rules in Lexical Phonology.’ Linguistic Inquiry 18: 1–44.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bošković, Željko. 1997. The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bošković, Željko. 2002a. ‘A-Movement and the EPP.’ Syntax 5: 167–218.
Bošković, Željko. 2002b. ‘On Multiple Wh-Fronting.’ Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–83.
Bošković, Željko. 2003. ‘Agree, Phases and Intervention Effects.’ Linguistic Analysis 33: 54–96.
Bošković, Željko. 2004a. ‘Be Careful Where You Float Your Quantifiers.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 681–742.
Bošković, Željko. 2004b. ‘Object Shift and the Clause/PP Parallelism Hypothesis.’ In WCCFL 23: Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. B. Schmeiser, V. Chand, A. Kelleher & A. Rodriguez, 101–14. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Bošković, Željko. 2005. ‘On the Locality of Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP.’ Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.
Bošković, Željko. 2007. ‘On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: an Even More Minimal Theory.’ Linguistic Inquiry 38: 589–644.
Bošković, Željko. 2009. ‘More on the No-DP Analysis of Article-Less Languages.’ Studia Linguistica 63: 187–203.
Bošković, Željko. 2011. ‘On Unvalued Interpretable Features.’ In NELS 39: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. S. Lima, K. Mullin & B. Smith, 109–20. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Bošković, Željko. (To appear). ‘Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis.’ Linguistic Inquiry.
Bošković, Željko & Steven Franks. 2000. ‘Across-the-Board Movement and LF.’ Syntax 3: 107–28.
Bošković, Željko & Daiko Takahashi. 1998. ‘Scrambling and Last Resort.’ Linguistic Inquiry 29: 347–66.
Bowers, John. 1993. ‘The Syntax of Predication.’ Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.
Bowers, John. 2002. ‘Transitivity.’ Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183–224.
Bresnan, Joan W. 1971. ‘Sentence Stress and Syntactic Transformations.’ Language 47: 257–81.
Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. ‘QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD.’ Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233–73.
Bruening, Benjamin. 2004. ‘Two Types of Wh-Scope Marking in Passamaquoddy.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 229–305.
Büring, Daniel. 2005. Binding Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Butler, Jonny. 2005. ‘The Phase Structure of Tense.’ In Perspectives on Phases, ed. M. McGinnis & N. Richards, 69–85. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Cable, Seth. 2008. ‘Wh-fronting in Hungarian Is Not Focus Fronting.’ Manuscript. Available at Lingbuzz (lingbuzz/000674).
Calabrese, Andrea. 1984. ‘Multiple Questions and Focus in Italian.’ In Sentential Complementation, ed. W. De Geest & T. Putseys, 67–74. Dordrecht: Foris.
Carnie, Andrew & Andrew Barss. 2006. ‘Phases and Nominal Interpretation.’ Research In Language 4: 127–32.
Carstens, Vicki. 2000. ‘Concord in Minimalist Theory.’ Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319–55.
Carstens, Vicki. 2003. ‘Rethinking Complementizer Agreement: Agree with a Case-Checked Goal.’ Linguistic Inquiry 34: 393–412.
Carstens, Vicki. 2005. ‘Agree and EPP In Bantu.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 219–79.
Carstens, Vicki & Michael Diercks. 2011. ‘Agreeing How? Implications for Theories of Agreement And Locality.’ Manuscript. Available at Lingbuzz (lingbuzz/001389).
Castillo, Juan Carlos, John E. Drury & Kleanthes K. Grohmann. 2009. ‘Merge over Move and the Extended Projection Principle: MOM and the EPP Revisited.’ Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 1: 53–114.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2004. ‘Explaining the Locality Conditions of QR: Consequences for the Theory Of Phases.’ Natural Language Semantics 12: 345–97.
Cecchetto, Carlo & Caterina Donati. 2010. ‘On Labeling: Principle C and Head Movement.’ Syntax 13: 241–78.
Charlow, Simon. 2009. ‘Can DP Be a Scope Island?’ Talk given at the ESSLLI09 Student Session.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. ‘On The Typology of Wh-Questions.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. ‘Remarks on Nominalization.’ In Readings In English Transformational Grammar, by R. A. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn & Co.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam. 1994. Bare Phrase Structure. Working Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. ‘Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.’ In Step By Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. E. A. Martin, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. ‘Derivation by Phase.’ In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. ‘Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.’ In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3, ed. A. Belletti, 104–31. Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. ‘Three Factors in Language Design.’ Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. ‘Approaching UG from Below.’ In Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, ed. U. Sauerland & H. -M. Gärtner, 1–30. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. ‘On Phases.’ In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta, 133–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2013The Problem of Projection.’ Lingua 130: 33–49.
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Chung, S., W. A. Ladusaw & J. McCloskey. 1995. ‘Sluicing and Logical Form.’ Natural Language Semantics 3: 239–82.
Chung, Sandra. 1994. ‘Wh-Agreement and “Referentiality” in Chamorro.’ Linguistic Inquiry 25: 1–44.
Chung, Sandra. 1998. The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. University of Chicago Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. ‘A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress.’ Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–97.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2002. Functional Structure in DP and IP. Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. 2010. Mapping Spatial PPs. Oxford University Press.
Citko, Barbara. 2000. ‘Parallel Merge and the Syntax of Free Felatives.’ Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University.
Citko, Barbara. 2005. ‘On the Nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge.’ Linguistic Inquiry 36: 475–97.
Citko, Barbara. 2006. ‘Copula Sentences Reconsidered.’ In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 14: The Princeton Meeting 2005, ed. J. E. Lavine, S. Franks, M. Tasseva-Kurktchieva & H. Filip, 83–98. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Citko, Barbara. 2008a. ‘Missing Labels.’ Lingua 118: 907–44.
Citko, Barbara. 2008b. ‘Small Clauses Reconsidered: Not So Small and Not All Alike.’ Lingua 118: 261–95.
Citko, Barbara. 2010. ‘On the (A)Symmetric Nature of Movement: A View from Polish Wh- and Passive Movement.’ In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 18: The Second Cornell Meeting 2009, ed. C. Browneet al., 38–57. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Citko, Barbara. 2011a. ‘Multidominance.’ In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, ed. C. Boeckx, 119–42. Oxford University Press.
Citko, Barbara. 2011b. Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move and Labels. Cambridge University Press.
Citko, Barbara. 2011c. ‘Small Clauses.’ Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 748–63.
Cole, Peter & Gabriella Hermon. 1998. ‘The Typology of WH Movement: WH Questions in Malay.’ Syntax 1: 221–58.
Collins, Chris. 2002. ‘Eliminating Labels.’ In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Corver, Norbert. 1990. ‘The Syntax of Left Branch Extraction.’ Doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University.
Corver, Norbert. 1992. ‘Left Branch Extraction.’ In NELS 22: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, ed. K. Broderick, 67–84. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van. 2010. The Syntax of Ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch Dialects. Oxford University Press.
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van & Liliane M. V. Haegeman. 2007. ‘The Derivation of Subject-Initial V2.’ Linguistic Inquiry 38: 167–78.
Culicover, Peter W. & Paul Martin Postal (eds.). 2001. Parasitic Gaps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Danon, Gabi. 2011. ‘Agreement and DP-Internal Feature Distribution.’ Syntax 14: 97–317.
Davies, William D. & Stanley Dubinsky. 2003. ‘On Extraction from NPs.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 1–37.
Dayal, Veneeta. 1996. Locality in Wh-Quantification: Questions and Relative Clauses in Hindi. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Dayal, Veneeta. 1993. ‘Scope Marking as Indirect Wh-Dependency.’ Natural Language Semantics 2: 137–70.
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2006a. ‘A Reappraisal of vP Being Phasal – A Reply to Legate.’ Unpublished manuscript, CUNY Graduate Center.
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2006b. Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2007. ‘Phase Extension: Contours of a Theory of the Role of Head Movement in Phrasal Extraction.’ Theoretical Linguistics 33: 1–41.
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. ‘On the Functional Structure of Locative and Directional PPs.’ In Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, ed. G. Cinque & L. Rizzi, 74–126. Oxford University Press.
Diercks, Michael. 2011. ‘Against Feature Inheritance: Phase Heads Are Not Defined by Unvalued Φ-features.’ Manuscript.
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dobashi, Yoshihiko. 2003. ‘Phonological Phrasing and Syntactic Derivation.’ Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Dogil, Grzegorz. 1987. ‘Lexical Phonology and Floating Inflection in Polish.’ In Phonologica 1984, ed. W. U. Dressler, 39–47. Cambridge University Press.
Donati, Caterina & Carlo Cecchetto. 2011. ‘Relabeling Heads: A Unified Account for Relativization Structures.’ Linguistic Inquiry 42: 519–60.
Dornisch, Ewa. 1998. ‘Multiple Wh-Questions in Polish: The Interactions between Wh-Phrases and Clitics.’ Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Drummond, Alex, Norbert Hornstein & Howard Lasnik. 2010. ‘A Puzzle about P-Stranding and a Possible Solution.’ Linguistic Inquiry 41: 689–92.
Dyakonova, Marina. 2007. ‘Russian Double Object Construction.’ ACLC Working Papers 21: 1–28.
Dziwirek, Katarzyna. 2000. ‘Why Polish Doesn’t Like Infinitives.’ Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 57–82.
Elordieta, Gorka. 2008. ‘An Overview of Theories of the Syntax-Phonology Interface.’ International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology (ASJU) 42(1): 209–86.
Embick, David. 1995. ‘Mobile inflections in Polish.’ In NELS 25: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, ed. J. N. Beckman, 127–42. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Emonds, Joseph. 1985. A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
Emonds, Joseph. 2001. ‘The Lower Operator Position with Parasitic Gaps.’ In Features and Interfaces in Romance, ed. J. Herschensohn, E. Mallén & K. Zagona, 85–106. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. ‘The Semantics of Specificity.’ Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.
Engdahl, Elisabet. 2001. ‘Parasitic Gaps.’ In Parasitic Gaps, ed. Peter W. Culicover & Paul M. Postal, 69–97. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Epstein, Samuel. 2007. ‘On I(nternalist)-Functional Explanation in Minimalism.’ Linguistic Analysis 33: 20–53.
Epstein, Samuel D. & T. Daniel Seely. 2002. ‘Rule Applications as Cycles in a Level-Free Syntax.’ In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely, 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell.
Epstein, Samuel D. & T. Daniel Seely. 2006. Transformations and Derivations. Cambridge University Press.
Fanselow, Gisbert & Damir Čavar. 2002. ‘Distributed Deletion.’ In Theoretical Approaches to Universals, ed. A. Alexiadou, 65–107. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Felser, Claudia. 2004. ‘Wh-Copying, Phases, and Successive Cyclicity.’ Lingua 114: 543–74.
Fox, Danny. 1999. ‘Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of Chains.’ Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157–96.
Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and Semantic InterpretationCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fox, Danny & David Pesetsky. 2005. ‘Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure.’ Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–46.
Frampton, John & Sam Gutmann. 2000. ‘Agreement is Feature Sharing.’ Unpublished manuscript, Northeastern University.
Frampton, John, & Sam Gutmann. 2002. ‘Crash-Proof Syntax.’ In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. S. D. Epstein & T. Daniel Seely, 90–105. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Franks, Steven. 1998. ‘Clitics in Slavic.’ Paper Presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop. Spencer, IN.
Franks, Steven & Piotr Bański. 1999. ‘Approaches to “Schizophrenic” Polish Person Agreement.’ In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Seattle Meeting, ed. K. Dziwirek, H. Coats & C. M. Vakareliyska, 123–44. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Frascarelli, Mara (ed.). 2006. Phases of Interpretation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Frederici, Angela. 1982. ‘Syntactic and Semantic Processes in Aphasic Deficits: the Availability of Prepositions.’ Brain And Language 15: 269–58.
Froud, Karen. 2001. ‘Prepositions and the Lexical/Functional Divide: Aphasic Evidence.’ Lingua 111: 1–28.
Gallego, Ángel J. 2010. Phase Theory. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gallego, Ángel J. 2012. Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Gavruseva, E. 2000. ‘On the Syntax of Possessor Extraction.’ Lingua 110: 743–72.
Gengel, Kirsten. 2007. ‘Focus and Ellipsis a Generative Analysis of Pseudogapping and Other Elliptical Structures.’ Doctoral dissertation, Stuttgart University.
Gengel, Kirsten. 2009. ‘Phases and Ellipsis.’ Linguistic Analysis 35: 21–42.
Green, Georgia M. 1974. Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1991. ‘Extended Projection.’ Manuscript, Brandeis University.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2003. Prolific Domains: On the Antilocality of Movement Dependencies. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2009a (ed.). Explorations of Phase Theory: Features And Arguments. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2009b (ed.). Explorations of Phase Theory: Interpretation at the Interfaces. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2009c (ed). Interphases: Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford University Press.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2011. ‘Anti-Locality: Too-Close Relations in Grammar.’ In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, ed. C. Boeckx, 260–90. Oxford University Press.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K., John Drury & Juan Carlos Castillo. 2000. ‘No More EPP.’ In WCCFL 19: Proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. R. Billerey & B. D. Lillehaugen, 153–66. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1992. Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West Flemish. Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, Liliane & Marjo Van Koppen. 2011. ‘Complementizer Agreement and the Relation Between C° And T°.’ Manuscript, Ghent University and University of Utrecht.
Hale, Ken & Jay S. Keyser. 1993. ‘On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations.’ In The View From Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. K. Hale & J. S. Keyser, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halle, Morris & Alex Marantz. 1993. ‘Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection’. In The View From Building 20, ed. K. Hale & J. S. Keyser, 111–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An Essay on Stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hankamer, Jorge & Ivan Sag. 1976. ‘Deep and Surface Anaphora.’ Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.
Harves, Stephanie. 2002. ‘Where Have All the Phases Gone? (Non-)Defective Categories and Case Alternations in Russian’. In Formal Approaches To Slavic Linguistics 10: The Second Ann Arbor Meeting, ed. J. Toman, 97–118. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Heycock, Caroline. 1995. ‘Asymmetries in Reconstruction.’ Linguistic Inquiry 26: 547–70.
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. ‘Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese.’ In Proceedings of HUMIT 2000, 67–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. ‘Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture’. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Holmberg, Anders. 2001. ‘The Syntax of Yes and No in Finnish.’ Studia Linguistica 55: 141–75.
Hornstein, Norbert. 1994. ‘An Argument for Minimalism: the Case of Antecedent-Contained Deletion.’ Linguistic Inquiry 25: 455–80.
Hornstein, Norbert. 1995. Logical Form. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hornstein, Norbert & Jairo Nunes. 2002. ‘On Asymmetries between Parasitic Gap and Across-the-Board Constructions.’ Syntax 5: 26–54.
Hornstein, Norbert, Jairo Nunes & Kleanthes K. Grohmann. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge University Press.
Hornstein, Norbert & Amy Weinberg. 1981. ‘Case Theory and Preposition Stranding.’ Linguistic Inquiry 12: 55–91.
Horvath, Julia. 1997. ‘The Status of “Wh-Expletives” and the Partial Wh-Movement Construction of Hungarian.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 509–72.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. ‘Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1993. ‘Reconstruction and the Structure of VP: Some Theoretical Consequences.’ Linguistic Inquiry 24: 103–38.
Iatridou, Sabine & Ivy Sichel. 2011. ‘Negative DPs, A-Movement, and Scope Diminishment. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 595–629.
Inèenlikèj, Petr I. & Vladimir Nedjalkov. 1973. ‘Glagoly čuvstva v čukotskom jazyke.’ Lingvističeskie issledovanija 1972, 175–203.
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2003. ‘Intonation and Interface Conditions.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2007. ‘Major Phrase, Focus Intonation, Multiple Spell-Out (Map, FI, MSO).’ The Linguistic Review 24: 2–3.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jaysaseelan, K. A. 2001. ‘IP-Internal Topic and Focus Phrases.’ Studia Linguistica 55: 39–75.
Jeong, Youngmi. 2006. ‘The Landscape of Applicatives.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
Johnson, Kyle. 2000. ‘Few Dogs Eat Whiskas or Cats Alpo.’ In UMOP 23: Issues in Semantics and its Interface, ed. K. Kusumoto and E. Villalta, 59–82. Amherst, MA: GSLA.
Johnson, Kyle. 2009. ‘Gapping Is Not (VP-)Ellipsis.’ Linguistic Inquiry 40: 289–328.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2003. ‘Syntactic Categories and Persian Stress.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 333–79.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2004. ‘The Syntax of Sentential Stress.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2005. ‘Towards a Phase-Based Theory of Sentential Stress.’ In Perspectives on Phases, ed. M. McGinnis & N. Richards, 125–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers In Linguistics.
Kasai, Hironobu. 2007. ‘Multidominance in Syntax.’ Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul Martin Postal. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard S. 1980. ‘Extensions of Binding and Case-Marking.’ Linguistic Inquiry 11: 75–96.
Kayne, Richard S. 1981. ‘On Certain Differences between French and English.’ Linguistic Inquiry 12: 349–72.
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard S. 1999. ‘Prepositional Complementizers as Attractors.’ Probus 11: 39–73.
Kayne, Richard S. 2004. ‘Prepositions as Probes’. In Structures and Beyond, ed. A. Belletti, 192-X. Oxford University Press.
Kayne, Richard S. 2010. ‘Why Are There No Directionality Parameters?’ Manuscript, New York University.
Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. ‘Antecedent-Contained Deletion and the Syntax of Quantification.’ Linguistic Inquiry 28: 662–88.
Khomitsevich, Olga. 2007. ‘Dependencies across Phases: From Sequence of Tense to Restrictions on Movement.’ Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht: LOT.
Kinyalolo, Kasangati Kikuni Wabongambilu. 1991. ‘Syntactic Dependencies and the SPEC–Head Agreement Hypothesis in Kilega.’ Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. ‘Partitive Case and Aspect’. In The Projection of Arguments, ed. M. Butt & W. Gueder. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kiss, Katalin É. 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Koopman, Hilda. 2000. ‘Prepositions, Postpositions, Circumpositions, and Particles: The Case of Dutch PPs’. In The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads: Collected Essays of Hilda J. Koopman, ed. H. Koopman, 204–60. London: Routledge.
Kratzer, Angelika & Elisabeth Selkirk. 2007. ‘Phase Theory and Prosodic Spell-Out: The Case of Verbs.’ The Linguistic Review 24: 93–135.
Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2005. ‘French Adjective Ordering: Perspectives on DP-Internal Movement Types.’ Lingua 115: 645–89.
Lahne, Antje. 2008. ‘Where There Is Fire There Is Smoke: Local Modelling of Successive-Cyclic Movement.’ Doctoral dissertation, University Of Leipzig.
Landau, Idan. 1999. ‘Elements of Control.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival ConstructionsDordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.
Landau, Idan. 2003. ‘Movement out of Control.’ Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471–98.
Landau, Idan. 2008. ‘Two Routes of Control: Evidence from Case Transmission in Russian.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 877–924.
Landau, Idan. 2010. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Larson, Richard K. 1985. ‘Quantifying into NP.’ Manuscript, Stony Brook University.
Larson, Richard K. 1988. ‘Light Predicate Raising.’ MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers 27. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Cognitive Science.
Larson, Richard & Robert May. 1990. ‘Antecedent Containment or Vacuous Movement: Reply to Baltin.’Linguistic Inquiry 21: 103–22.
Lasnik, Howard. 1992. ‘Case and Expletives: Notes Toward a Parametric Account.’ Linguistic Inquiry 23: 381–405.
Lasnik, Howard. 1998. ‘Exceptional Case Marking: Perspectives Old And New.’ In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Connecticut Meeting 1997, ed. Z. Bošković, S. Franks & W. Snyder, 187–211. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Lasnik, Howard. 1999. ‘Chains of Arguments.’ In Working Minimalism, ed. S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein, 189–215. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lebeaux, David. 1990. ‘Relative Clauses, Licensing, and the Nature of the Derivation.’ In NELS 20: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. J. Carter, R.-M. Dechaine, B. Philip & T. Sherer, 318–32. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Lebeaux, David. 1991. ‘Relative Clauses, Licensing, and the Nature of the Derivation.’ In Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, ed. S. Rothstein, 209–39. New York: Academic Press.
Lebeaux, David. 1994. ‘Where does binding theory apply?’ MS, University of Maryland, College Park.
Lebeaux, David. 2009. Where Does Binding Theory Apply?Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Legate, Julie Anne. 2002. Phases in Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. Manuscript.
Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. ‘Some Interface Properties of the Phase.’ Linguistic Inquiry 34: 506–16.
Legate, Julie Anne. 2011. ‘Under-Inheritance.’ Handout of a paper presented at NELS 42, University of Toronto.
Legate, Julie Anne. 2012. ‘The Size of Phases.’ In Phases, ed. A. Gallego, 233–50. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lobeck, Anne C. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lutz, Uli,Gereon Müller & Arnim von Stechow. 2000. Wh-Scope Marking. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Macdonald, Jonathan Eric. 2006. ‘The Syntax of Inner Aspect.’ Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University.
Mahajan, Anoop Kumar. 1989. ‘Agreement and Agreement Phrases.’ In Functional Heads and Clause Structure, ed. I. Laka & A. K. Mahajan, 217–52, Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Mahajan, Anoop Kumar. 1996. ‘Wh-Expletives and the Syntax of Partial Wh-Movement.’ In Papers On Scope Marking, ed. U. Lutz & G. Müller, 163–77. University of Tübingen / University of Stuttgart.
Manetta, Emily. 2010. ‘Wh-Expletives in Hindi-Urdu: The vP Phase.’ Linguistic Inquiry 41: 1–34.
Marantz, Alec. 1993. ‘Implications of Asymmetries in Double Object Constructions.’ In Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar, ed. S. Mchombo, 113–50. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Marantz, Alec. 2007. ‘Phases and Words.’ In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, ed. H. Choe, 191–220. Seoul: Dong In.
Martin, Roger Andrew. 1996. ‘A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control.’ Doctoral dissertation, University Of Connecticut.
Marušič, Franc Lanko. 2005. ‘On Non-Simultaneous Phases’. Doctoral dissertation. Stony Brook University.
Marušič, Franc Lanko. 2009. ‘Non-Simultaneous Spell-Out in the Clausal and Nominal Domain.’ In Interphases: Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. K. K. Grohmann, 151–81. Oxford University Press.
Matushansky, Ora. 2000. ‘The Instrument of Inversion: Instrumental Case and Verb Raising in the Russian Copula’. In WCCFL 19: Proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. R. Billerey & B. Lillehaugen, 101–15. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Matushansky, Ora. 2005. ‘Going through a Phase’. In Perspectives on Phases, ed. M. McGinnis & N. Richards, 157–81. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Matushansky, Ora. 2008. ‘Predication: A Case Study’. In Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics: Contributions from Formal Description of Slavic Languages 6.5, ed. F. Marusic & R. Zaucer, 213–39. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
May, Robert. 1977. ‘The Grammar of Quantification.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
May, Robert 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCloskey, James. 1998. ‘The Prosody of Quantifier Stranding under Wh-Movement in West Ulster English.’ Manuscript.
McCloskey, James. 2000. ‘Quantifier Float and Wh-Movement in an Irish English.’ Linguistic Inquiry 31: 57–84.
McCloskey, James. 2001. ‘The Morphosyntax of WH-Extraction In Irish.’ Journal of Linguistics 37: 67–100.
McCloskey, James. 2002. ‘Resumption, Successive Cyclicity, and the Locality of Operations.’ In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. S. D. Epstein & T. Daniel Seely, 184–226. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
McDaniel, Dana. 1989. ‘Partial and Multiple Wh-Movement.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 565–604.
McGinnis, Martha. 2001. ‘Variation in the Phase Structure of Applicatives.’ Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 105–46.
McGinnis, Martha & Norvin Richards (eds.). 2005. Perspectives on Phases. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working papers in Linguistics.
Megerdoomian, Karine. 2000. ‘Aspect and Partitive Objects in Finnish.’ In WCCFL 19: Proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. R. Billerey & B. D. Lillehaugen, 316–28. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2008. ‘An Asymmetry in Voice Mismatches in VP-Ellipsis and Pseudogapping.’ Linguistic Inquiry 39: 169–79.
Merchant, Jason. 2013. ‘Diagnosing Ellipsis.’ In Diagnosing Syntax, ed. L. Cheng & N. Corver, 537–42. Oxford University Press.
Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2006. ‘The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic.’ Doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. ‘Against Optional Scrambling.’ Linguistic Inquiry 28: 1–25.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2003. ‘A-movement Scrambling and Options without Optionality. In Word Order and Scrambling, ed. S. Karimi, 177–200. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2011. ‘Genitive Subjects in Altaic and Specification of Phase.’ Lingua 21: 1265–82.
Miyagawa, Shigeru & Takae Tsujioka. 2004. ‘Argument Structure and Ditransitive Verbs in Japanese.’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 1–38.
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge University Press.
Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Müller, Gereon. 2004. ‘Phrase Impenetrability and Wh-Intervention.’ In Minimality Effects in Syntax, ed. A. Stepanov, G. Fanselow & R. Vogel, 289–325. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Müller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on Displacement: A Phase-Based Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Munn, Alan. 1999. ‘First Conjunct Agreement: Against a Clausal Analysis.’ Linguistic Inquiry 30: 643–68.
Muysken, Pieter. 2008. Functional Categories. Cambridge University Press.
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Newman, Stanley. 1946. ‘On the Stress System of English.’ Word 2: 171–87.
Nissenbaum, Jonathan. 2000. ‘Investigations in Covert Movement.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Nunes, Jairo. 1995. ‘The Copy Theory of Movement and the Linearization of Chains in the Minimalist Program.’ Doctoral dissertation, University Of Maryland.
Oehrle, Richard T. 1976. ‘The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Ouali, Hamid. 2008. ‘On C-To-T Phi-Feature Transfer: The Nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement In Berber’. In Agreement Restrictions, ed. R. D’alessandro, G. H. Hrafnbjargarson & S. Fischer, 159–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pak, Marjorie. 2008. ‘The Postsyntactic Derivation and its Phonological Reflexes.’ Doctoral dissertation, University Of Pennsylvania.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2007. ‘The Universality of DP: A View from Russian.’ Studia Linguistica 61: 59–94.
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2007. Copular Sentences in Russian: A Theory of Intra-Clausal Relations. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pesetsky, David. 1998. ‘Some Optimality Principles of Sentence Pronounciation’. In Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition In Syntax, ed. P. Barbosa, D. Fox,P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis & D. Pesetsky,337–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David. 1991 ‘Zero Syntax: vol. 2: Infinitives.’ Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2001. ‘T-To-C Movement: Causes And Consequences’. In Ken Hale: A Life In Language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2006. ‘Probes, Goals and Syntactic Categories.’ In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, ed. Y. Otsu, 25–60. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. ‘The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability Of Features’. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. In Honor of Joseph E. Emonds, ed. S. Karimi, V. Samiian & W. K. Wilkins, 262–94. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Peterson, David A. 2007. Applicative Constructions. Oxford University Press.
Picallo, M. Carme. 1991. ‘Nominals and Nominalizations in Catalan.’ Probus 3: 279–316.
Plessis, Hans Du. 1977. ‘Wh Movement in Afrikaans.’ Linguistic Inquiry, 8: 723–6.
Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam. 2001. ‘Long-Distance Agreement and Topic in Tsez.’ Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19: 583–646.
Postal, Paul M. 1972. ‘On Some Rules that Are Not Successive Cyclic.’ Linguistic Inquiry 3: 211–22.
Preminger, Omer. 2011. ‘Agreement as a Fallible Operation.’ Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. ‘Determiner Phrase in a Language without Determiners.’ Journal of Linguistics 34: 165–79.
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quinoli, Carlos. 2008. ‘Anaphora by Phase.’ Syntax 11: 299–329.
Rackowski, Andrea & Norvin Richards. 2005. ‘Phase Edge and Extraction: A Tagalog Case Study.’ Linguistic Inquiry 36: 565–99.
Radkevich, Nina. 2010. ‘On Location: The Structure of Case and Adpositions.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2001. ‘Extraction from Nominal Phrases in Polish and the Theory of Determiners.’ Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 159–98.
Rausch, Philip, Frank Burchert & Ria De Bleser. 2005. ‘Parallels in the Breakdown of CP and DP-Internal Movement Processes in Agrammatism: A Preliminary Case Study.’ Brain And Language 95: 129–30.
Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland. 1993. ‘Reflexivity.’ Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.
Richards, Marc. 2004. ‘Object Shift and Scrambling in North and West Germanic: A Case Study in Symmetrical Syntax.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Richards, Marc. 2007. ‘Dynamic Linearization and the Shape of Phases.’ Linguistic Analysis 33: 209–37.
Richards, Marc. 2008. ‘On Feature Inheritance: An Argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition.’ Linguistic Inquiry 38: 563–72.
Richards, Marc. 2011. ‘Deriving the Edge: What’s in a Phase?Syntax 14: 74–95.
Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures. Oxford University Press.
Richards, Norvin. 2012. ‘Lardil “Case Stacking” and the Timing of Case Assignment.’ Syntax 16: 42–76.
Richardson, Kylie. 2007. Case and Aspect in Slavic. Oxford University Press.
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1992. ‘Cross-Linguistic Evidence for Number Phrase.’ Canadian Journal of Linguistics / Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 37: 197–218.
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1993. ‘Where’s Gender?Linguistic Inquiry 24: 795–803.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg. 2010. ‘Introduction: Parameters in Minimalist Theory.’ In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, ed. T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan, 1–57. Cambridge University Press.
Rooryck, Johan. 1997. ‘On the Interaction between Raising and Focus in Sentential Complementation.’ Studia Linguistica 51: 1–49.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. ‘Constraints on Variables in Syntax.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Rouveret, Alain. 2012. ‘VP Ellipsis, Phases and the Syntax of Morphology.’ Natural Language And Linguistic Theory 30: 897–963.
Rudin, Catherine. 1988. ‘On Multiple Questions and Multiple WH Fronting.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445–501.
Rutkowski, Paweł. 2002. ‘The Syntax of Quantifier Phrases and the Inherent versus Structural Case Distinction.’ Linguistic Research 7: 43–74.
Rutkowski, Paweł & Ljiljana Progovac. 2005. ‘Classification Projection in Polish and Serbian.’ In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 2004, ed. S. Frankset al., 289–99. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Sabbagh, Joseph. 2007. ‘Ordering and Linearizing Rightward Movement.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 349–401.
Sag, Ivan A. 1976. ‘Deletion and Logical Form.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Saito, Mamoru. 2003. ‘Derivational Approach to the Interpretation of Scrambling Chains.’ Lingua 113: 481–518.
Saito, Mamoru, T. H. Jonah Lin & Keiko Murasugi. 2008. ‘“N”-Ellipsis and the Structure of Noun Phrases in Chinese and Japanese.’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 247–71.
Samuels, Bridget. 2011. ‘A Minimalist Program for Phonology.’ In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, ed. C. Boeckx, 574–94. Oxford University Press.
Sato, Yosuke. 2011. ‘P-Stranding under Sluicing and Repair by Ellipsis: Why Is Indonesian (Not) Special?Journal Of East Asian Linguistics 20: 339–82.
Sato, Yosuke. 2012. ‘Successive Cyclicity at the Syntax-Morphology Interface: Evidence from Standard Indonesian and Kendal Javanese.’ Studia Linguistica 66: 32–57.
Sauerland, Uli. 2005. ‘DP Is Not a Scope Island.’ Linguistic Inquiry 36: 303–14.
Sauerland, Uli & Paul Elbourne. 2002. ‘Total Reconstruction, PF Movement, and Derivational Order.’ Linguistic Inquiry 33: 283–319.
Scheer, Tobias 2012. ‘Chunk Definition in Phonology: Prosodic Constituency vs. Phase Structure.’ In Modules and Interfaces, ed. M. Bloch-Trojnar & A. Bloch-Rozmej, 221–53. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Scott, Gary-John. 2002. ‘Stacked Adjectival Modification and the Structure of Nominal Phrases.’ In Functional Structure in DP and IP, ed. G. Cinque, 91–120. Oxford University Press.
Seely, T. Daniel. 2006. ‘Merge, Derivation C-Command and Subcategorization in a Label-Free Syntax.’ In Miminalist Essays, ed. C. Boeckx, 182–220. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Seidl, Amanda Hallie. 2000. ‘Minimal Indirect Reference: A Theory of the Syntax–Phonology Interface.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. ‘Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing.’ In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. J. Goldsmith, 550–69. London: Blackwell.
Sener, Serkan & Daiko Takahashi. 2009. Argument Ellipsis in Japanese and Turkish. University of Connecticut, Storrs, and Tohoku University.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2002. ‘To Be an Oblique Subject: Russian vs. Icelandic.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 691–724.
Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. ‘A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure.’ Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–49.
Starke, Michal. 1995. ‘On the Format for Small Clauses.’ In Syntax and Semantics 28: Small Clauses, ed. A. Cardinaletti & M. Guasti, 237–69. New York: Academic Press.
Stepanov, Arthur. 2000. ‘WH-Scope Marking in Slavic.’ Studia Linguistica 54: 1–40.
Stjepanovic, Sandra. 2008. ‘P-Stranding under Sluicing in a Non P Stranding Language.’ Linguistic Inquiry 39: 179–90.
Stowell, Timothy. 1981. ‘Origins of Phrase Structure.’ Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Stowell, Timothy. 1982. ‘The Tense of Infinitives.’ Linguistic Inquiry 13: 561–70.
Stoyanova, Marina. 2008. Unique Focus: Languages without Multiple Wh-Questions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Svenonius, Peter. 1994. ‘Dependent Nexus: Subordinate Predication Structures in English and the Scandinavian Languages.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
Svenonius, Peter. 2002. ‘Case Is Uninterpretable Aspect.’ Paper presented at the Perspectives on Aspect Conference, University of Utrecht. Available at www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/papers/Svenonius02CUA.pdf
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. ‘On the Edge.’ In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects, ed. D. Adger, C. de Cat & G. Tsoulas, 261–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Svenonius, Peter. 2007a. ‘Interpreting Uninterpretable Features.’ Linguistic Analysis 33: 375–413.
Svenonius, Peter. 2007b. ‘The Position of Adjectives and Other Phrasal Modifiers in the Decomposition of DP.’ In Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, ed. L. McNally & Ch. Kennedy, 16–42. Oxford University Press.
Swan, Oscar. 2002. A Grammar of Contemporary Polish. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. ‘The Possessor that Ran away From Home.’ The Linguistic Review 3: 89–102.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. ‘The Noun Phrase.’ In Syntax and Semantics 27: The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian, ed. F. Kiefer & K. Kiss, 179–274. New York: Academic Press.
Szczegielniak, Adam. 2008. ‘Islands And Sluicing in Polish.’ In WCCFL 27: Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. N. Abner & J. Bishop, 404–12. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Takahashi, Masahiko. 2011. ‘Some Consequences of Case-Marking in Japanese.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Tanaka, Tomoyuki & Azusa Yokogoshi. 2010. ‘The Rise of a Functional Category in Small Clauses.’ Studia Linguistica1–32.
Tellier, Christine. 1988. ‘Universal Licensing: Implications for Parasitic Gap Constructions.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Thornton, Rosalind Jean. 1990. ‘Adventures in Long-Distance Moving: The Acquisition of Complex Wh-Questions.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Tomaszewicz, Barbara. 2012. ‘The Syntactic Position of Slavic “by” and its Effect on Main Clause Phenomena.’ In Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190: Main Clause Phenomena, ed. L. Aelbrecht, L. Haegeman & R. Nye. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Travis, Lisa de Mena. 2010. Inner Aspect: The Articulation of VP. Dordrecht: Springer.
Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. ‘On Government.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. ‘Multiple Spell-Out.’ In Working Minimalism, ed. S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein, 251–82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Uriagereka, Juan. 2012. Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program. Oxford University Press.
Valois, Daniel. 1991. ‘The Internal Syntax of DP.’ Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1978. A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases. Lisse: Peter De Ridder Press.
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1990. ‘Functional Prepositions.’ In Unity in Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon C. Dik on His 50th Birthday, ed. H. Pinkster & I. Geene, 229–42. Dordrecht: Foris.
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1998. ‘Categorial Feature Magnetism: The Endocentricity and Distribution of Projections.’ Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 1–48.
Wachowicz, Krystyna A. 1974. ‘Against the Universality of a Single Wh-Question Movement.’ Foundations of Language 11: 155–66.
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. ‘Subjacency and S-Structure Movement of Wh-in-Situ.’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 255–91.
Wexler, Kenneth & Peter Culicover. 1980. Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wiland, Bartosz. 2010. ‘Overt Evidence from Polish Left Branch Extraction for Punctuated Paths.’ Linguistic Inquiry 41: 335–47.
Witkoś, Jacek. 2010a. ‘Movement Theory of Control and CP-Infinitives in Polish.’ In Movement Theory of Control, ed. N. Hornstein & M. Polinsky, 45–65. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Witkoś, Jacek. 2010b. ‘On Lack of Case on the Subject of Infinitives in Polish.’ Folia Linguistica 1: 179–237.
Yadroff, Michael. 1999. ‘Formal Properties of Functional Categories: The Minimalist Syntax of Russian Nominal and Prepositional Expressions.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Indiana.
Yadroff, Michael & Steven Franks. 2001. ‘The Origin of Prepositions.’ In Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics, ed. G. Zybatow, U. Junghanns, G. Mehlhorn, & L. Szucsich, 69–79. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Zagona, Karen. 1988. ‘Proper Government of Antecedentless VP In English and Spanish.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 95–128.
Zamparelli, Roberto. 1996. ‘Layers in the Determiner Phrase.’ Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 2005. ‘Phrasal Stress and Syntax.’ In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ed. M. Everaert & H. Van Riemsdijk, 522–68. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1998. Focus, Prosody, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1993. ‘Dutch Syntax: A Minimalist Approach.’ Doctoral dissertation, Groningen: Universiteitsdrukkerij.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1997. Morphosyntax of Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.