Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T16:49:22.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Methods of Neuroethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2024

Luca Malatesti
Affiliation:
University of Rijeka
John McMillan
Affiliation:
University of Otago

Summary

This Element offers a framework for exploring the methodological challenges of neuroethics. The aim is to provide a roadmap for the methodological assumptions, and related pitfalls, involved in the interdisciplinary investigation of the ethical and legal implications of neuroscientific research and technology. It illustrates these points via the debate about the ethical and legal responsibility of psychopaths. Argument and the conceptual analysis of normative concepts such as 'personhood' or 'human agency' is central to neuroethics. This Element discusses different approaches to establishing norms and principles that regulate the practices addressed by neuroethics and that involve the use of such concepts. How to characterize the psychological features central to neuroethics, such as autonomy, consent, moral understanding, moral motivation, and control is a methodological challenge. In addition, there are epistemic challenges when determining the validity of neuroscientific evidence.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009076173
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 08 February 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharoni, E., Funk, C., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Gazzaniga, M. (2008). Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 145–60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.007.Google Scholar
Aharoni, E., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P., & Kiehl, K. A. (2012). Can psychopathic offenders discern moral wrongs? A new look at the moral/conventional distinction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(2), 484–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024796.Google Scholar
Aharoni, E., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P., & Kiehl, K. A. (2014). What’s wrong? Moral understanding in psychopathic offenders. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 175–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, N. E., & Kiehl, K. A. (2012). The psychopath magnetized: Insights from brain imaging. Cognition in Neuropsychiatric Disorders (special Issue), 16(1), 5260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.008.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. E., & Kiehl, K. A. (2014). Psychopathy: Developmental perspectives and their implications for treatment. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 32(1), 103–17. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-139001.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S. (2005). Dangerous people with severe personality disorders. Psychiatric Services, 56(7), 874. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.7.874.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean Ethics (Crisp, R., ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baskin-Sommers, A. R., Brazil, I. A., Ryan, J., et al. (2015). Mapping the association of global executive functioning onto diverse measures of psychopathic traits. Personality Disorders, 6(4), 336–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000125.Google Scholar
Battin, M. P. (2013). Bioethics. In Lafollette, H. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics (pp. 535–51). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee782.Google Scholar
Bayne, T. (2022). Philosophy of Mind: An Introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1), 715. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3.Google Scholar
Beck, J. C. (2010). Dangerous severe personality disorder: The controversy continues. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(2), 277–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.931.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. (2005). Philosophy of Psychology: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Birks, D. F., & Douglas, T. (eds.). (2018). Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice (first edition). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. (1995). A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition, 57(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-P.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, R. J. R. (1997). Moral reasoning and the child with psychopathic tendencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(5), 731–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00249-8.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R., Colledge, E., & Mitchell, D. G. V. (2001). Somatic markers and response reversal: Is there orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in boys with psychopathic tendencies? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29(6), 499511. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012277125119.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R., Mitchell, D., & Blair, K. (2005). The Psychopath: Emotion and the Brain. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, L. (2010). Delusions and Other Irrational Beliefs. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Q., van Donkelaar, P., & Illes, J. (2022). Methods of neuroethics. In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience (second edition) (pp. 240–5). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819641-0.00122-5.Google Scholar
Brazil, I. A., Maes, J., Scheper, I., et al. (2013). Reversal deficits in individuals with psychopathy in explicit but not implicit learning conditions. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 38(4), E13E20. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.120152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil, I. A., van Dongen, J. D. M., Maes, J. H. R., Mars, R. B., & Baskin-Sommers, A. R. (2018). Classification and treatment of antisocial individuals: From behavior to biocognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 91, 259–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.010.Google Scholar
Brook, M., Brieman, C. L., & Kosson, D. S. (2013). Emotion processing in Psychopathy Checklist – assessed psychopathy: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(8), 979–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.008.Google Scholar
Burns, T., Yiend, J., Fahy, T., et al. (2011). Treatments for dangerous severe personality disorder (DSPD). Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22(3), 411–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2011.577439.Google Scholar
Christman, J. (2020). Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (fall ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/autonomy-moral/.Google Scholar
Cima, M., Tonnaer, F., & Hauser, M. D. (2010). Psychopaths know right from wrong but don’t care. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(1), 5967. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp051.Google Scholar
Clausen, J., & Levy, N. (eds.). (2015). Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer.Google Scholar
Cleckley, H. M. (1988). The Mask of Sanity: An Attempt to Clarify Some Issues about the So-Called Psychopathic Personality (fifth edition). Emily S. Cleckley.Google Scholar
Cohen, C., Copi, I. M., Rodych, V., & McMahon, K. (2019). Introduction to Logic (fifteenth edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171–88.Google Scholar
Crane, T. (2014). Aspects of Psychologism. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cruft, R., Kramer, M. H., & Reiff, M. R. (eds.). (2011). Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, M. A. (2015). The neurobiology of psychopathy: Recent developments and new directions in research and treatment. CNS Spectrums, 20(3), 200–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852914000741.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error. Putnam.Google Scholar
De Ridder, D., Verplaetse, J., & Vanneste, S. (2013). The predictive brain and the ‘free will’ illusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(Article 131), 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00131.Google Scholar
De Vries, R. (2005). Framing neuroethics: A sociological assessment of the neuroethical imagination. American Journal of Bioethics, 5(2), 25–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160590960267.Google Scholar
Deigh, J. (1995). Empathy and universalizability. Ethics, 105(4), 743–63.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1989). The Intentional Stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Home Office, & HM Prison Service. (2005). Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder (DSPD) High Security Services: Planning and Delivery Guide. Home Office, UK Government.Google Scholar
Douglas, T. (2008). Moral enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(3), 228–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00412.x.Google Scholar
Duff, A. (1977). Psychopathy and moral understanding. American Philosophical Quarterly, 14(3), 189200.Google Scholar
Duff, A. (2010). Psychopathy and answerability. In Malatesti, L. & McMillan, J. (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy (pp. 198212). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Earp, B. D., & Savulescu, J. (2020). Love Is the Drug: The Chemical Future of Our Relationships. Manchester University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/300/monograph/book/84383.Google Scholar
Eastman, N., & Campbell, C. (2006). Neuroscience and legal determination of criminal responsibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 311–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1887.Google Scholar
Elliott, C. (1996). The Rules of Insanity: Moral Responsibility and the Mentally Ill Offender. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Engelhaupt, E. (2023). The most (and least) realistic movie psychopaths ever. ScienceNews, 14 January. www.sciencenews.org/blog/gory-details/most-and-least-realistic-movie-psychopaths-ever.Google Scholar
Fine, C., & Kennett, J. (2004). Mental impairment, moral understanding and criminal responsibility: Psychopathy and the purposes of punishment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 425–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.06.005.Google Scholar
Finlay, S. & Schroeder, M. (2017). Reasons for action: Internal vs. external. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (fall ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasons-internal-external/.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (2000). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (first edition). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, L., & Blair, R. J. (1998). Cognitive impairment and its relationship to psychopathic tendencies in children with emotional and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26(6), 511–19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1022655919743.Google Scholar
Flor, H., Birbaumer, N., Hermann, C., Ziegler, S., & Patrick, C. J. (2002). Aversive pavlovian conditioning in psychopaths: Peripheral and central correlates. Psychophysiology, 39(4), 505–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3940505.Google Scholar
Focquaert, F., Glenn, A. L., & Raine, A. (2015). Psychopathy and free will from a philosophical and cognitive neuroscience perspective. In Glannon, W. (ed.), Free Will and the Brain (pp. 103–24). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565820.007.Google Scholar
Fowles, D. C., & Dindo, L. (2006). A dual-deficit model of psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J. (ed.), Handbook of Psychopathy (pp. 1434). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gacono, C. B. (2016). The Clinical and Forensic Assessment of Psychopathy: A Practitioners Guide.Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Glenn, A. L., Schug, R. A., Yang, Y., & Raine, A. (2009). The neurobiology of psychopathy: A neurodevelopmental perspective. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 54(12), 813–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905401204.Google Scholar
Gillett, G., & Huang, J. (2013). What we owe the psychopath: A neuroethical analysis. AJOB Neuroscience, 4(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2013.783647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glannon, W. (2011). Brain, Body, and Mind: Neuroethics with a Human Face. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glannon, W. (2014). The limitations and potential of neuroimaging in the criminal law. Journal of Ethics, 18(2), 153–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-014-9169-y.Google Scholar
Glenn, A. L., & Raine, A. (2008). The neurobiology of psychopathy. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31(3), 463–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2008.03.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenn, A. L., Raine, A., & Laufer, W. S. (2011). Is it wrong to criminalize and punish psychopaths? Emotion Review, 3(3), 302–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402372.Google Scholar
Glimmerveen, J. C., Maes, J. H. R., & Brazil, I. A. (2022). Psychopathy, maladaptive learning and risk-taking. In Malatesti, L., McMillan, J., & Šustar, P. (eds.), Psychopathy: Its Uses, Validity, and Status, (pp. 189211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82454-9_11.Google Scholar
Griffiths, S. Y., & Jalava, J. V. (2017). A comprehensive neuroimaging review of PCL-R defined psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 6075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.07.002.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. K. B., Hiatt Racer, K., & Newman, J. P. (2015). Impaired integration in psychopathy: A unified theory of psychopathic dysfunction. Psychological Review, 122(4), 770–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039703.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. (2020). Neuroethics for fantasyland or for the clinic? The limitations of speculative ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29(4), 630–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180120000377.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (1982). Psychopathy and physiological activity during anticipation of an adversive stimulus in a distraction paradigm. Psychophysiology, 19(3), 266–71.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (1998). Psychopaths and their nature: Implications for the mental health and criminal justice systems. In Millon, T., Simonsen, E., Birket-Smith, M., & Davis, R. D. (eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, Criminal, and Violent Behavior (pp. 188212). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Herba, C. M., Hodgins, S., Blackwood, N., et al. (2007). The neurobiology of psychopathy: A focus on emotion processing. In Herve, H. & Yuille, J. C. (eds.), The Psychopath: Theory, Research, and Practice (1st ed., pp. 253–83). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hiatt, K. D., & Newman, J. P. (2006). Understanding psychopathy: The cognitive side. In Patrick, C. J. (ed.), Handbook of Psychopathy (pp. 334–52). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hirstein, W., & Sifferd, K. L. (2011). The legal self: Executive processes and legal theory. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(1), 156–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.007.Google Scholar
Home Office. (1999). Managing Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorders: Proposals for Policy Development. The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hoppenbrouwers, S. S., Bulten, B. H., & Brazil, I. A. (2016). Parsing fear: A reassessment of the evidence for fear deficits in psychopathy. Psychological Bulletin, 142(6), 573600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illes, J., & Federico, C. A. (eds.). (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
IMDb. (2014). Fargo. TV series. The crocodile’s dilemma. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3097534/.Google Scholar
Jalava, J., & Griffiths, S. (2017). Philosophers on psychopaths: A cautionary tale in interdisciplinarity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 24(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2017.0000.Google Scholar
Jalava, J., & Griffiths, S. (2022). Psychopathy: Neurohype and its consequences. In Malatesti, L., McMillan, J., & Šustar, P. (eds.), Psychopathy: Its Uses, Validity, and Status, (pp. 7998). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82454-9_6.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. S. M. (2017). Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: Ethical, legal, and social implications. In Johnson, L. S. M. & Rommelfanger, K. S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics (pp. 225–40). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jurjako, M., & Malatesti, L. (2016). Instrumental rationality in psychopathy: Implications from learning tasks. Philosophical Psychology, 29(5), 717–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1144876.Google Scholar
Jurjako, M., & Malatesti, L. (2018). Neuropsychology and the criminal responsibility of psychopaths: Reconsidering the evidence. Erkenntnis, 83(5), 1003–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9924-0.Google Scholar
Jurjako, M., Malatesti, L., & Brazil, I. A. (2020). Biocognitive classification of antisocial individuals without explanatory reductionism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 957–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904160.Google Scholar
Justman, S. (2021). The guilt-free psychopath. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 28(2), 87104. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2021.0014.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1898). On a supposed right to tell lies from benevolent motives. In Abbott, T. K. (trans.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics (pp. 361–5). Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998a). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998b). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Gregor, M., ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Stich, S., Haley, K. J., Eng, S. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2007). Harm, affect, and the moral/conventional distinction. Mind, 22(2), 117–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00302.x.Google Scholar
Kennett, J. (2010). Reasons, emotion, and moral judgment in the psychopath. In Malatesti, L. & McMillan, J. (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry, and Philosophy (pp. 243–59). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199551637.003.0014.Google Scholar
Kiehl, K. A., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P. (eds.). (2013). Handbook on Psychopathy and Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2011). Philosophy of Mind (3rd ed.). Westview Press.Google Scholar
Koenigs, M., & Newman, J. P. (2013). The decision-making impairment in psychopathy: Psychological and neurobiological mechanisms. In Kiehl, K. A. & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P. (eds.), Handbook on Psychopathy and Law (pp. 93106). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koenigs, M., Baskin-Sommers, A., Zeier, J., & Newman, J. P. (2011). Investigating the neural correlates of psychopathy: A critical review. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(8), 792–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2010.124.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lennon, K. (1990). Explaining Human Action. Open Court.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2007a). Neuroethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2007b). The responsibility of the psychopath revisited. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 14(2), 129–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.0.0003.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2014). Psychopaths and blame: The argument from content. Philosophical Psychology, 27(3), 351–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.729485.Google Scholar
Litton, P. (2008). Responsibility status of the psychopath: On moral reasoning and rational self-governance. Rutgers Law Journal, 39(349), 349–92.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55(1), 610. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047232.Google Scholar
Malatesti, L. (2010). Moral understanding in the psychopath. Synthesis Philosophica, 24(2), 337–48. https://hrcak.srce.hr/49419.Google Scholar
Malatesti, L., & McMillan, J. (eds.). (2010). Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry, and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malatesti, L., & McMillan, J. (2021). Some methodological issues in neuroethics: The case of responsibility and psychopathy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30(4), 681–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180121000153.Google Scholar
Malatesti, L., Jurjako, M., & Meynen, G. (2020). The insanity defence without mental illness? Some considerations. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 71, 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101571.Google Scholar
Malatesti, L., McMillan, J., & Šustar, P. (eds.). (2022). Psychopathy: Its Uses, Validity and Status, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82454-9.Google Scholar
Maraun, M. D. (2022). Psychopathy and the issue of existence. In Malatesti, L., McMillan, J., & Šustar, P. (eds.), Psychopathy: Its Uses, Validity and Status, (pp. 121–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82454-9_8.Google Scholar
McCarthy, C. (2006). No Country for Old Men. Vintage International.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. (2013). Psychiatric ethics. In LaFollette, H. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics (pp. 4186–95). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. (2018). The Methods of Bioethics: An Essay in Meta-Bioethics (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. (2021). Cleckley’s psychopaths. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 28(2), 105–7. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2021.0015.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. (ed.). (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meloy, J. R. (1988). The Psychopathic Mind: Origins, Dynamics, and Treatment. Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2018). Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers (4th ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Meynen, G. (2016). Legal insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44721-6.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. G. V., Colledge, E., Leonard, A., & Blair, R. J. R. (2002). Risky decisions and response reversal: Is there evidence of orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in psychopathic individuals? Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 2013–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00056-8.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. (2000). Rationality and responsibility. Southern California Law Review, 74, 251–68.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. (2008). Psychopathy and criminal responsibility. Neuroethics, 1(3), 205–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-008-9021-9.Google Scholar
Mullen, P. E. (1999). Dangerous people with severe personality disorder. BMJ, 319(7218), 1146–7.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. G. (1972). Moral death: A Kantian essay on psychopathy. Ethics, 82(4), 284–98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2379853.Google Scholar
Newman, J. P., Patterson, C. M., Howland, E. W., & Nichols, S. L. (1990). Passive avoidance in psychopaths: The effects of reward. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(11), 1101–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90021-I.Google Scholar
O’Brien, B. S., & Frick, P. J. (1996). Reward dominance: Associations with anxiety, conduct problems, and psychopathy in children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24(2), 223–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01441486.Google Scholar
Ogloff, J. R. P., & Wong, S. (1990). Electrodermal and cardiovascular evidence of a coping response in psychopaths. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(2), 231–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017002006.Google Scholar
Pardo, M. (2012). Rationality. Working Paper, University of Alabama, School of Law. https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_working_papers/295.Google Scholar
Patrick, C. J. (ed.). (2018). Handbook of Psychopathy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Patrick, C. J., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1993). Emotion in the criminal psychopath: Startle reflex modulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(1), 8292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.102.1.82.Google Scholar
Penney, S. (2012). Impulse control and criminal responsibility: Lessons from neuroscience. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(2), 99103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.12.004.Google Scholar
Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2012). Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Public Safety (Public Protection Orders) Act (2014). Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand. www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2012/0068/latest/DLM4751015.html.Google Scholar
Racine, E., & Sample, M. (2017). The competing identities of neuroethics. In Rommelfanger, K. S. & Johnson, L. S. M. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics (pp. 313). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315708652.ch1.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). The law of peoples. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 3668.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism (expanded ed.). Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reznek, L. (1997). Evil or Ill? Justifying the Insanity Defense. Routledge.Google Scholar
Roskies, A. L. (2016). Neuroethics. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (spring ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/neuroethics/.Google Scholar
Roskies, A. L., & Morse, S. J. (2013). Neuroscience and the law: Looking forward. In Morse, S. J. & Roskies, A. L. (eds.), A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience: A Contribution of the Law and Neuroscience Project, Supported by the MacArthur Foundation (pp. 240–56). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859177.003.0009.Google Scholar
Rothemund, Y., Ziegler, S., Hermann, C., et al. (2012). Fear conditioning in psychopaths: Event-related potentials and peripheral measures. Biological Psychology, 90(1), 50–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.011.Google Scholar
Savulescu, J., & Bostrom, N. (2009). Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmuckler, M. A. (2001). What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy, 2(4), 419–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0204_02.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Latzman, R. D., & Wygant, D. B. (2022). Assessment of psychopathy: Addressing myths, misconceptions, and fallacies. In Malatesti, L., McMillan, J., & Šustar, P. (eds.), Psychopathy: Its Uses, Validity, and Status, (pp. 143–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82454-9_9.Google Scholar
Sethi, A., Sarkar, S., Dell’Acqua, F., et al. (2018). Anatomy of the dorsal default-mode network in conduct disorder: Association with callous-unemotional traits. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 8792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.01.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, E. (2022). Legal responsibility: Psychopathy, a case study. In Nelkin, D. K. & Pereboom, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility (pp. 387411). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190679309.013.22.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1981). The Methods of Ethics (7th ed.). Hackett (original work published 1874).Google Scholar
Sifferd, K. L., & Hirstein, W. (2013). On the criminal culpability of successful and unsuccessful psychopaths. Neuroethics, 6(1), 129–40.Google Scholar
Snelling, J., & McMillan, J. (2022). Antisocial personality disorders and public protection orders in New Zealand. In Malatesti, L., McMillan, J., & Šustar, P. (eds.), Psychopathy: Its Uses, Validity, and Status, Vol 27 (pp. 4357). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82454-9_4.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. P. (2016). The role of impulse control disorders in assessing criminal responsibility: Medico-legal perspectives from South Africa. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(3), 413–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2015.1080145.Google Scholar
Stratton, J., Kiehl, K. A., & Hanlon, R. E. (2015). The neurobiology of psychopathy. Psychiatric Annals, 45, 186–94.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. (1993). Freedom and resentment. In Fischer, J. M. & Ravizza, M. (eds.), Perspectives on Moral Responsibility (pp. 125). Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tamatea, A. J. (2022). Humanising psychopathy, or what it means to be diagnosed as a psychopath: Stigma, disempowerment, and scientifically-sanctioned alienation. In Malatesti, L., McMillan, J., & Šustar, P. (eds.), Psychopathy: Its Uses, Validity, and Status, (pp. 1941). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82454-9_3.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (1983). The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention (reprint). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yannoulidis, S. (2012). Mental State Defences in Criminal Law. Ashgate.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Methods of Neuroethics
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Methods of Neuroethics
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Methods of Neuroethics
Available formats
×