Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T05:30:48.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rural Development in Southeast Asia

Dispossession, Accumulation and Persistence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2020

Jonathan Rigg
Affiliation:
University of Bristol

Summary

Rural areas and rural people have been centrally implicated in Southeast Asia's modernisation. Through the three entry points of smallholder persistence, upland dispossession, and landlessness, this Element offers an insight into the ways in which the countryside has been transformed over the past half century. Drawing on primary fieldwork undertaken in Laos, Thailand and Vietnam, and secondary studies from across the region, Rigg shows how the experience of Southeast Asia offers a counterpoint and a challenge to standard, historicist understandings of agrarian change and, more broadly, development. Taking a rural view allows an alternative lens for theorising and judging Southeast Asia's modernisation experience and narrative. The Element argues that if we are to capture the nature – and not just the direction and amount – of agrarian change in Southeast Asia, then we need to view the countryside as more than rural and greater than farming.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781108750622
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 01 October 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akram-Lodhi, A.H. and Kay, C. (2010a). Surveying the agrarian question (part 1): Unearthing foundations, exploring diversity. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 177202.Google Scholar
Akram-Lodhi, A.H. and Kay, C.(2010b). Surveying the agrarian question (part 2): Current debates and beyond. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(2), 255–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. (1998). ‘From miracle to crash’. London Review of Books, 20(8): 37.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. and Martin, W., eds. (2009). Distortions of Agricultural Incentives in Asia. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, D. (2013). Social margins and precarious work in Vietnam. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(4), 468–87.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. and Campbell, S. (2018). Capitalist trajectories in Mekong Southeast Asia. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(2), 181–91.Google Scholar
Bader, C., Bieri, S., Wiesmann, U., and Heiniman, A. (2017). Is economic growth increasing disparities? A multidimensional analysis of poverty in the Lao PDR between 2003 and 2013. The Journal of Development Studies, 53(12), 2067–85.Google Scholar
Baird, I.G. (2011). Turning land into capital, turning people into labour: Primitive accumulation and the arrival of large-scale economic land concessions in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry, 5(1), 1026.Google Scholar
Baird, I.G.(2014a). Degraded forest, degraded land and the development of industrial tree plantations in Laos. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 35(3), 328–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, I.G.(2014b). The global land grab meta-narrative, Asian money laundering and elite capture: Reconsidering the Cambodian context. Geopolitics, 19(2), 431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, I.G.(2020). Problems for the plantations: Challenges for large‐scale land concessions in Laos and Cambodia. Journal of Agrarian Change, 20(3), 387407.Google Scholar
Baird, I.G. and Fox, J. (2015). How land concessions affect places elsewhere: Telecoupling, political ecology, and large-scale plantations in southern Laos and northeastern Cambodia. Land, 4(2), 436–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, I.G., Noseworthy, W., Tuyen, N.P., Ha, L.T. and Fox, J. (2019). Land grabs and labour: Vietnamese workers on rubber plantations in southern Laos. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 40(1), 5070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaji, J. (1990). Illusions about the peasantry: Karl Kautsky and the agrarian question. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 17(2), 288307.Google Scholar
Barney, K. (2009). Laos and the making of a relational resource frontier. The Geographical Journal, 175(1), 146–59.Google Scholar
Barney, K.(2014). Ecological knowledge and the making of plantation concession territories in southern Laos. Conservation and Society, 12(4), 352.Google Scholar
Beaman, L. and Dillon, A. (2009). Do Household Definitions Matter in Survey Design? Results from a Randomized Survey Experiment in Mali. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Bernstein, H. (2006). Is there an agrarian question in the 21st century? Revue canadienne d’études du développement/Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 27(4), 449–60.Google Scholar
Bernstein, H., Friedmann, H., van der Ploeg, J.D., Shanin, T. and White, B. (2018). Forum: Fifty years of debate on peasantries, 1966–2016. Journal of Peasant Studies, 45, 689714.Google Scholar
Bezemer, D. and Hazell, P. (2006). The Agricultural Exit Problem: An Empirical Assessment (Prepared for the World Development Report 2008 ‘Agriculture for Development’). Rimisp-Latin American Center for Rural Development. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9214.Google Scholar
Boomgaard, P. (1989). Children of the Colonial State: Population Growth and Economic Development in Java, 1795–1880. Amsterdam: Free University Press.Google Scholar
Borras, S.M. (2006). The Philippine land reform in comparative perspective: Some conceptual and methodological implications. Journal of Agrarian Change, 6(1), 69101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borras, S.M. and Franco, J.C. (2010). Contemporary discourses and contestations around pro-poor land policies and land governance. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(1), 132.Google Scholar
Borras, S.M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B. and Wolford, W. (2011). Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209–16.Google Scholar
Bray, F. (1986). The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickell, K. 2014. ‘The whole world is watching’: Intimate geopolitics of forced eviction and women’s activism in Cambodia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104, 1256–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I. (1997). Economic Change in South-East Asia, c.1830–1980. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burawoy, M. (2009). The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, P. (1986). Waiting for the ‘Just King’: The agrarian world of south-central Java from Giyanti (1755) to the Java War (1825–30). Modern Asian Studies, 20(1), 59137.Google Scholar
Carlson, K.M., Curran, L.M., Ratnasari, D., et al. (2012). Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(19), 7559–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Cederroth, S. (1995). Survival and Profit in Rural Java: The Case of an East Javanese Village. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Cederroth, S. and Gerdin, I. (1986). Cultivating poverty: The case of the green revolution in Lombok. In Norlund, I., Cederroth, S. and Gerdin, I., eds., Rice Societies: Asian Problems and Prospects. London: Curzon Press for Scandanavian Institute of Asian Studies, pp. 124–50.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (2004) Ideas for development: reflecting forwards. IDS Working Paper 238. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.487.8068&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Cho, E.-J. (2018). Korea’s Agricultural Policy: History, Challenges and Ways Forward. Seoul: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
Clendenning, J. (2018). Is education the golden plough? Inside Indonesia, 134 (October-December). www.insideindonesia.org/is-education-the-golden-ploughGoogle Scholar
Clendenning, J.(2020). The Inevitability of Leaving and the Impossibility of Staying Away: Rural Youth Migration and Agrarian Change in Flores, Indonesia. PhD in Geography. Singapore: National University of Singapore. https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/168785.Google Scholar
Cole, R. (2020). Across the Mountain Tracks: Global Agri-Food Networks and Agrarian Change in Laos’ Northeast Borderlands. PhD in Geography. Singapore: National University of Singapore. https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/168776.Google Scholar
Cole, R. and Rigg, J., (2019). Lao peasants on the move: Pathways of agrarian change in Laos. Australian Journal of Anthropology, 30, 160–80.Google Scholar
Coxhead, I. (2015). Introduction: Southeast Asia’s long transition. In Coxhead, I., ed., Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Economics. London, Routledge, pp. 321.Google Scholar
Cramb, R., ed. (2020) White Gold: The Commercialisation of Rice Farming in the Lower Mekong Basin. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramb, R., Manivong, V., Newby, J.C., Sothorn, K. and Sibat, P.S. (2017). Alternatives to land grabbing: Exploring conditions for smallholder inclusion in agricultural commodity chains in Southeast Asia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(4), 939–67.Google Scholar
Cruz-Del Rosario, T. and Rigg, J. (2019). Living in an age of precarity in 21st century Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49, 517–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J.S. (2018). Stagnating yields, unyielding profits: The political economy of Malaysia’s rice sector. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 49(1), 105–28.Google Scholar
Dayley, R. and Sattayanurak, A. (2016). Thailand’s last peasant. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 47, 4265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Koninck, R. and Rousseau, J.-F. (2012). Gambling with the Land: The Contemporary Evolution of Southeast Asian Agriculture. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Deininger, K., Byerlee, D., Lindsay, J., Norton, A., Selod, H. and Stickler, M. (2011). Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W.H., Smith, W. and Montefrio, M.J.F..(2018). Ungovernable? The vital natures of swidden assemblages in an upland frontier. Journal of Rural Studies, 61, 343–54.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. (2013). The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Eastwood, R., Lipton, M. and Newell, A. (2010). Farm size. In Pingali, P.L. and Evenson, R.E., eds., Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Burlington: Elsevier, Academic Press, pp. 3323–97.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R. (2002). Daughters and displacement: Migration dynamics in an Indonesian transmigration area. Journal of Development Studies, 38(5), 143–66.Google Scholar
Elson, R.E. (1997). The End of the Peasantry in Southeast Asia: Social and Economic History of Peasant Livelihood, 1800s-1990s. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1894). The Peasant Question in France and Germany. First published in Die Neue Zeit, Bd.1, No.10, 1894–95. English translation available: www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Engles_The_Peasant_Question_in_France_and_Germany.pdfGoogle Scholar
Estudillo, J.P. and Otsuka, K.. 2009. Rural poverty and income dynamics in Southeast Asia. In Economics Working Paper no 6. Manila: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Global Center of Excellence.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (2015). Give a Man a Fish: Reflections on the New Politics of Distribution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Firman, T. (2004). Demographic and spatial patterns of Indonesia’s recent urbanisation. Population, Space and Place, 10(6), 421–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J., Nghiem, T., Kimkong, H., Hurni, K. and Baird, I.G. (2018). Large-scale land concessions, migration, and land use: The paradox of industrial estates in the Red River Delta of Vietnam and rubber plantations of northeast Cambodia. Land, 7(2), 77.Google Scholar
Friis, C. and Nielsen, J.Ø. (2016). Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: Exploring the case of Chinese banana investments in Northern Laos. Land Use Policy, 57, 117–29.Google Scholar
Friis, C. and Nielsen, J.Ø.(2017). On the system. Boundary choices, implications, and solutions in telecoupling land use change research. Sustainability, 9(6), 120.Google Scholar
Friis, C., Reenberg, A., Heinimann, A. and Schönweger, O. (2016). Changing local land systems: Implications of a Chinese rubber plantation in Nambak District, Lao PDR. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 37(1), 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. (1963). Agricultural Involution: The Process of Ecological Change in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Malaysia (2010). Economic Transformation Programme: A Roadmap for Malaysia. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Performance Management and Delivery Unit, Jabatan Perdana Menteri.Google Scholar
GRAIN (2008). Seized! The 2008 land grab for food and financial security. GRAIN Briefing. Barcelona, Spain: GRAIN.Google Scholar
Griffin, K. and Ghose, A.K. (1979). Growth and impoverishment in the rural areas of Asia. World Development, 7(4), 361–83.Google Scholar
Griffin, K., Khan, A.R. and Ickowitz, A. (2002). Poverty and the distribution of land. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2(3), 279330.Google Scholar
Hall, D. (2011). Land grabs, land control, and Southeast Asian crop booms. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 837–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D.(2012). Rethinking primitive accumulation: Theoretical tensions and rural Southeast Asian complexities. Antipode, 44(4), 1188–208.Google Scholar
Hall, D.(2013). Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession and the global land grab. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1582–604.Google Scholar
Hall, D., Hirsch, P. and Li, T.M. (2011). Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hazell, P. and Rahman, A. (2014). Introduction. In Hazell, P. and Rahman, A., eds., New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 112.Google Scholar
HelpAge (2014). The Ageing of Rural Populations: Evidence on Older Farmers in Low and Middle-income Countries. London: HelpAge International.Google Scholar
Hewison, K. and Tularak, W. (2013). Thailand and precarious work: An assessment. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(4), 444–67.Google Scholar
Hickel, J. (2019). Bill Gates says poverty is decreasing. He couldn’t be more wrong. Guardian. London. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/29/bill-gates-davos-global-poverty-infographic-neoliberal.Google Scholar
Hickey, S. and du Toit, A., (2007). Adverse incorporation, social exclusion and chronic poverty. Working Paper No. 81. Manchester, CPRC (Chronic Poverty Research Centre), University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1994). Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. (2012). From the ‘feminization of agriculture’ to the ‘ageing of farming populations’: Demographic transition and farming in a central Chinese village. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 27(1), 1932.Google Scholar
Hung, P.-Y. (2019). Taiwan: Towards the revitalization of smallholder agriculture. In Thompson, E., Gillen, J. and Rigg, J., eds., Asian Smallholders in Comparative Perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 239–70.Google Scholar
Jacka, T. (2018). Translocal family reproduction and agrarian change in China: A new analytical framework. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(7), 1341–59.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, T.S. (2018). From the workplace to the household: Migrant labor and accumulation without dispossession. Critical Asian Studies, 50(2), 176–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, K. (2019). Accumulation without dispossession? Land commodification and rent extraction in peri-urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(4), 633–48.Google Scholar
Kautsky, K. (1988). The Agrarian Question. London: Zwan.Google Scholar
Kelley, L.C. (2018). The politics of uneven smallholder cacao expansion: A critical physical geography of agricultural transformation in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Geoforum, 97, 2234.Google Scholar
Kelley, L.C., Peluso, N.L., Carlson, K.M. and Afiff, S. (2020). Circular labor migration and land-livelihood dynamics in Southeast Asia’s concession landscapes. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 2133.Google Scholar
Kelly, P.F. (2011). Migration, agrarian transition, and rural change in Southeast Asia. Critical Asian Studies, 43(4), 479506.Google Scholar
Kenney-Lazar, M. (2012). Plantation rubber, land grabbing and social-property transformation in southern Laos. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 1017–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney-Lazar, M.(2018). Governing dispossession: Relational land grabbing in Laos. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(3), 679–94.Google Scholar
Kenney-Lazar, M., Suhardiman, D. and Dwyer, M.B. (2018). State spaces of resistance: Industrial tree plantations and the struggle for land in Laos. Antipode, 50(5), 1290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, C. (2012). ‘Cosmopolitan’ villagers and populist democracy in Thailand. South East Asia Research, 20(3), 343–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, C.(2014). Finding Their Voice: Northeastern Thai Villages and the Thai State. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
Kontgis, C., Schneider, A., Fox, J., Saksena, S., Spencer, J.H. and Castrence, M. (2014). Monitoring peri-urbanization in the greater Ho Chi Minh City metropolitan area. Applied Geography, 53, 377–88.Google Scholar
Krishna, A. (2017). The Broken Ladder: The Paradox and Potential of India’s One-Billion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kusakabe, K. and Myae, A.C. (2019). Precarity and vulnerability: Rubber plantations in northern Laos and northern Shan State, Myanmar. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49, 586601.Google Scholar
Leitner, H. and Sheppard, E. (2018). From kampungs to condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(2), 437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lestrelin, G. (2010). Land degradation in the Lao PDR: Discourses and policy. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 424–39.Google Scholar
Levien, M. (2011). Special economic zones and accumulation by dispossession in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(4), 454–83.Google Scholar
Li, T.M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Li, T.M.(2010). To make live or let die: Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode, 41(s1), 6693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T.M.(2011). Centering labor in the land grab debate. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 281–98.Google Scholar
Li, T.M.(2017). Intergenerational displacement in Indonesia’s oil palm plantation zone. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(6), 1158–76.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Hull, V., Bastistella, M. et al. (2013). Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18(2). www.jstor.org/stable/26269331Google Scholar
Lowder, S.K., Skoet, J. and Singh, S. (2014). What do we really know about the number and distribution of farms and family farms worldwide? ESA Working Paper No. 14–02. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Lowder, S.K., Skoet, J. and Singh, S.(2016). The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development, 87, 1629.Google Scholar
Lu, J.N. (2017). Tapping into rubber: China’s opium replacement program and rubber production in Laos. Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(4), 911–32.Google Scholar
Lu, J. and Schönweger, O. (2019). Great expectations: Chinese investment in Laos and the myth of empty land. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(1), 6178.Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, A. (2011). Migration and gender identity in the rural Philippines: Households with farming wives and migrant husbands. Critical Asian Studies, 43(4), 577–93.Google Scholar
Lund, C. (2014). Of what is this a case? Analytical movements in qualitative social science research. Human Organization, 73(3), 224–34.Google Scholar
Maclachlan, P.L. and Shimizu, K. (2016). Reforming Japan’s greying agricultural sector. AJIR Forum, 4(8). https://crawford.anu.edu.au/distribution/newsletter/ajrc/ajrc29.htmlGoogle Scholar
Manahan, M.A., Cruz, J. and Carranza, D. (2015). Standing on contentious grounds: Land grabbing, Philippine style. Focus on the Global South, 1(6), 39.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1887). Capital, Vol. 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Masina, P.P. and Cerimele, M. (2018). Patterns of industrialisation and the state of industrial labour in post-WTO-accession Vietnam. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(2), 289323.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J.F. (2010). Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: Oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), 821–50.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J.F.(2019). The paradox of progressing sideways: Food poverty and livelihood change in the rice lands of outer island Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies (early view), 1–21. https://doi-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1628021.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J.F. and Cramb, R.A. (2009). Policy narratives, landholder engagement, and oil palm expansion on the Malaysian and Indonesian frontiers. The Geographical Journal, 175(2), 112–23.Google Scholar
McGee, T.G. (1991). The emergence of Desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis. In Ginsburg, N., Koppel, B. and McGee, T.G., eds., The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 325.Google Scholar
McGee, T.G.(2008). Managing the rural-urban transformation in East Asia in the 21st century. Sustainability Science, 3(1), 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, D. (2003). Cultivating new local futures: Remittance economies and land-use patterns in Ifugao, Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 34(2), 285306.Google Scholar
McKay, D.(2005). Reading remittance landscapes: Female migration and agricultural transition in the Philippines. Geografisk tidskrift, 105(1), 89100.Google Scholar
McKay, D.(2012). Global Filipinos: Migrants’ Lives in the Virtual Village. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, M.B. (2012). Thai mobilities and cultural citizenship. Critical Asian Studies, 44(1), 85112.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, M. (1968). Agricultural Change and Peasant Choice in a Thai Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mortimer, R. (1973). Showcase State: The Illusion of Indonesia’s ‘Accelerated Modernisation’. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Naruemon, T. and McCargo, D. (2011). Urbanized villagers in the 2010 Thai Redshirt protests. Asian Survey, 51(6), 9931018.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. A., Gillen, J. and Rigg, J., (2020). Economic transition without agrarian transformation: The pivotal place of smallholder rice farming in Vietnam’s modernisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 8695.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T.A., Rigg, J., Huong, L.T.T. and Dieu, D.T. (2012). Becoming and being urban in Hanoi: Rural-urban migration and relations in Viet Nam. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(5), 1103–31.Google Scholar
OECD (2018). Innovation, Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability in China. OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Omar, S.C., Shaharudin, A. and Tumin, S.A. (2019). The Status of the Paddy and Rice Industry in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Khazanah Research Institute (KRI).Google Scholar
Ortega, A.A.C. (2012). Desakota and beyond: Neoliberal production of suburban space in Manila’s fringe. Urban Geography, 33(8), 1118–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, K., Liu, Y. and Yamauchi, F. (2016). The future of small farms in Asia. Development Policy Review, 34(3), 441–61.Google Scholar
Park, C.M.Y. 2019. ‘Our lands are our lives’: Gendered experiences of resistance to land grabbing in rural Cambodia. Feminist Economics, 25, 2144.Google Scholar
Paudel, D. (2016). Re-inventing the commons: Community forestry as accumulation without dispossession in Nepal. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(5), 9891009.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. (1977). Technology and peasant production: Reflections on a global study. Development and Change, 8(2), 125–59.Google Scholar
Peluso, N.L. and Purwanto, A.B. (2018). The remittance forest: Turning mobile labor into agrarian capital. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 39(1), 636.Google Scholar
Pinnawala, M. (2008). Engaging in trans-local management of households. Gender, Technology and Development, 12(3), 439–59.Google Scholar
Rambo, A.T. (2017). The agrarian transformation in Northeastern Thailand: A review of recent research. Southeast Asian Studies, 6(2), 211–45.Google Scholar
Rerkasem, B. (2016). Thai Rice: A Crop That Shapes the Lives and Land of a People, Feeds the World, and Has in Turn Been Moulded by Them. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Chiang Mai University Press.Google Scholar
Rigg, J. (2006). Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the rural South. World Development, 34(1), 180202.Google Scholar
Rigg, J.(2016). Challenging Southeast Asian Development: The Shadows of Success. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rigg, J.(2019). More Than Rural: Textures of Thailand’s Agrarian Transformation. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
Rigg, J., Phongsiri, M., Promphakping, B., Salamanca, A. and Sripun, M. (2020). Who will tend the farm? Interrogating the ageing Asian farmer. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47, 306–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigg, J. and Salamanca, A. (2011). Connecting lives, living, and location. Critical Asian Studies, 43(4), 551–75.Google Scholar
Rigg, J., Salamanca, A. and Thompson, E.C. (2016). The puzzle of East and Southeast Asia’s persistent smallholder. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 118–33.Google Scholar
Schoenberger, L., Hall, D. and Vandergeest, P. (2017). What happened when the land grab came to Southeast Asia? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(4), 697725.Google Scholar
Schönweger, O., Heinimann, A., Epprecht, M., Lu, J. and Thalongsengchanh, P. (2012). Concessions and Leases in the Lao PDR: Taking Stock of Land Investments. Vientiane, Lao PDR and University of Bern: Geographica Bernensia.Google Scholar
Scott, J.C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J.C.(1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J.C.(2009). The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scurrah, N. and Hirsch, P. (2015). The Political Economy of Land Governance in Cambodia. Sydney, Australia: Mekong Region Land Governance (MRLG), University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Shanin, T. (1971). Peasantry: Delineation of a sociological concept and a field of study. European Journal of Sociology, 12(2), 289300.Google Scholar
Shoji, G., Yoshida, K. and Yokoyama, S. (2019). Japan: Government interventions and part-time family farming. In Thompson, E., Gillen, J. and Rigg, J., eds., Asian Smallholders in Comparative Perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 81108.Google Scholar
Stoler, A.L. (1977). Rice harvesting in Kali Loro: A study of class and labor relations in rural Java. American Ethnologist, 4(4), 678–98.Google Scholar
Subpawanthanakun, K. (2016). Rice farming is in need of a total overhaul. Bangkok Post. Bangkok. https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1147841/rice-farming-is-in-need-of-a-total-overhaul.Google Scholar
Sumner, A.(2012b). The New Face of Poverty: How Has the Composition of Poverty in Low Income and Lower Middle-Income Countries (excluding China) Changed Since the 1990s? IDS Working Papers 408, 133.Google Scholar
Thieme, S. (2008). Sustaining livelihoods in multi-local settings: Possible theoretical linkages between transnational migration and livelihood studies. Mobilities, 3(1), 5171.Google Scholar
Vicol, M. (2019). Potatoes, petty commodity producers and livelihoods: Contract farming and agrarian change in Maharashtra, India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 19(1), 135–61.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2012). Thailand’s Political Peasants: Power in the Modern Rural Economy. Madison and London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
White, B. (2015). Generational dynamics in agriculture: Reflections on rural youth and farming futures. Cahiers Agricultures, 24(6), 330–34.Google Scholar
White, B.(2018). Marx and Chayanov at the margins: Understanding agrarian change in Java. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(5–6), 1108–26.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. A., Hu, Z. and Rahman, S. (2018). Community resilience in rural China: The case of Hu Village, Sichuan Province. Journal of Rural Studies, 60, 130–40.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. R., Silverman, S. and Yengoyan, A.A. (2001). Pathways of Power: Building an Anthropology of the Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolpe, H. (1972). Capitalism and cheap labour power in South Africa: From segregation to apartheid. Economy and Society, 1(4), 425–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank(2007). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zhan, S. (2019). Accumulation by and without dispossession: Rural land use, land expropriation, and livelihood implications in China. Journal of Agrarian Change, 19(3), 447–64.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K. S., Lambin, E.F. and Vanek, S.J. (2018). Smallholder telecoupling and potential sustainability. Ecology and Society, 23(1).Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Rural Development in Southeast Asia
  • Jonathan Rigg, University of Bristol
  • Online ISBN: 9781108750622
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Rural Development in Southeast Asia
  • Jonathan Rigg, University of Bristol
  • Online ISBN: 9781108750622
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Rural Development in Southeast Asia
  • Jonathan Rigg, University of Bristol
  • Online ISBN: 9781108750622
Available formats
×