No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Arqueología Incluyente
Weaving Diverse Narratives in Northwestern Mexican Archaeology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2022
Abstract
In Mexico, archaeological heritage belongs to all members of society, according to section XXV of Article 73 of the Mexican Constitution and Article 27 of the federal law on monuments and archaeological sites. The Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH) was founded in 1939 as a federal government agency for the research, protection, and dissemination of archaeological heritage. Although this heritage belongs to all, stringent rules and procedures create an unequal relationship between career professionals and the diverse communities interested in the past (i.e., collectors, local museums, descendant communities). It is long due to begin practicing an inclusive archaeology that considers all the various knowledge systems (i.e., academic, technical, local, and traditional) of the communities interested in the past. Here, we describe case studies from Sonora, Mexico, to propose the implementation of several far-reaching activities with artifact collectors, Indigenous communities, researchers, archaeologists, and INAH Sonora authorities. Our pilot proposal needs to be implemented in other areas of Mexico that continue to prioritize archaeological narratives over other narratives about our past.
En México el patrimonio arqueológico pertenece a todos los miembros de la sociedad de acuerdo con la fracción XXV del artículo 73 de la Constitución Política De los Estados Unidos Mexicanos y el artículo 27 de la Ley Federal de Monumentos y Sitios Arqueológicos. El Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH) fue fundado en 1939 como una agencia del gobierno federal para la investigación, protección y difusión del patrimonio arqueológico. Aunque este patrimonio pertenece a todos, las reglas y procedimientos estrictos crean una relación desigual entre los profesionales de carrera y las diversas comunidades interesadas en el pasado (por ejemplo, coleccionistas, museos locales, comunidades herederas). Ya es tiempo de iniciar la práctica de una arqueología incluyente que considera todos los diversos sistemas de conocimiento (por ejemplo, académicos, técnicos, locales y tradicionales) de las comunidades interesadas en el pasado. Aquí, describimos casos de estudio de Sonora, México presentando una propuesta piloto para ser implementada entre arqueólogos, miembros de Centro INAH Sonora y las comunidades indígenas, coleccionistas y museos locales. Este ejercicio enriquecerá a las interpretaciones arqueológicas, pero también promoverá el desarrollo de mejores metodologías para documentar y difundir el conocimiento sobre un pasado que es relevante para el presente. Nuestra propuesta piloto debe implementarse en otras áreas de México que continúen priorizando las narrativas arqueológicas sobre otras narrativas sobre nuestro pasado.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 10 , Special Issue 3: Professional-Collector Collaboration: Global Challenges and Solutions , August 2022 , pp. 285 - 294
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology
References
REFERENCES CITED
Azar, Christian, Holmberg, John, and Lindgren, Kristian 1996 Socio-ecological Indicators for Sustainability. Ecological Economics 18:89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, Herman, Woodhill, Jim, Hemmati, Minu, Verhoosel, Karèn, and van Vugt, Simone 2015 The MSP Guide: How to Design and Facilitate Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships. Centre for Development Innovation, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands. https://mspguideorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/12/the_msp_guide_3rd_ed_2019_wcdi_brouwer_woodhill.pdf, accessed August 12, 2022.Google Scholar
Brown, Jessica, and Hay-Edie, Terence 2014 Engaging Local Communities in Stewardship of World Heritage. A Methodology Based on the COMPACT Experience. World Heritage Papers 40. https://whc.unesco.org/en/series/40/, accessed August 12, 2022.Google Scholar
David W., Cash, Clark, William C., Alcock, Frank, and Mitchell, Ronald B. 2003 Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development. PNAS 100:8086–8091. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1231332100.Google Scholar
Chapin, Mac, Lamb, Zachary, and Threlkeld, Bill 2005 Mapping Indigenous Lands. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William C., Tomich, Thomas P., van Noordwijk, Meine, and McNie, Elizabeth 2011 Boundary Work for Sustainable Development: Natural Resource Management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). PNAS 113:4615–4622. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0900231108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip, and Ferguson, T. J. (editors) 2008 Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip, Ferguson, T. J., Lippert, Dorothy, McGuire, Randall H., Nicholas, George P., Watkins, Joe E., and Zimmerman, Larry J. 2010 The Premise and Promise of Indigenous Archaeology. American Antiquity 75:228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottom, Bolfy 2008 Nación, patrimonio cultural y legislación: Los debates parlamentarios y la construcción del marco jurídico federal sobre monumentos en México, siglo XX. Porrúa, Mexico City.Google Scholar
David, Nicholas, and Kramer, Carol 2001 Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson-Hunt, Iain J., and Michael O'Flaherty, R. 2007 Researchers, Indigenous Peoples and Place-Based Learning Communities. Society Natural Resources 20:291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enqvist, Johan, West, Simon, Masterson, Vanessa, Jamila, Lisbeth, Svedin, Uno, and Tengö, Maria 2018 Stewardship as a Boundary Object for Sustainability Research: Linking Care, Knowledge and Agency. Landscape and Urban Planning 179:17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, Patricia 2006 Practicing Ethnohistory: Mining Archives, Hearing Testimony, Constructive Narrative. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Geilfus, Frans 2002 80 Herramientas para el Desarrollo Participativo. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA), San José, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Yannis, and Anagnostopoulos, Aris 2009 Archaeological Ethnographies. Public Archaeology 8:65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber-Sannwald, Elisabeth, Martínez-Tagüeña, Natalia, Espejel, Iliana, Lucatello, Simone, Coppock, Layne, and Reyes-Gómez, Victor Manuel 2019 International Network for the Sustainability of Drylands – Transdisciplinary and Participatory Research for Dryland Stewardship and Sustainable Development. In Stewardship of Future Drylands and Climate Change in the Global South: Challenges and Opportunities for the Agenda 2030, edited by Lucatello, Simone, Huber-Sannwald, Elisabeth, Espejel, Iliana, and Martínez-Tagüeña, Natalia, pp. 82–86. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay T., Howitt, Richard, Cajete, Gregory, Berkes, Fikret, Louis, Renee Pualani, and Kliskey, Andrew 2016 Weaving Indigenous and Sustainability Sciences to Diversify Our Methods. Sustainability Science 11:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, John 1983 Review of Tarahumara: Where Night Is the Day of the Moon; Raramuri: A Tarahumara Colonial Chronicle, 1607–1791, by Bernard L. Fontana, Thomas E. Sheridan, and Thomas H. Naylor. Ethnohistory 30:124–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Jerome M. 1998 The Bow and the Blanket: Religion, Identity and Resistance in Rarámuri Material Culture. Journal of Anthropological Research 54:299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Tagüeña, Natalia 2015 And the Giants Keep Singing: Comcaac Anthropology of Meaningful Places. PhD dissertation, School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Martínez-Tagüeña, Natalia, and Rentería-Valencia, Rodrigo 2019 Social Cohesion and Environmental Governance among the Comcaac of Northern Mexico. In Stewardship of Future Drylands and Climate Change in the Global South: Challenges and Opportunities for the Agenda 2030, edited by Lucatello, Simone, Huber-Sannwald, Elisabeth, Espejel, Ileana, and Martínez-Tagüeña, Natalia, pp. 321–335. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Martínez-Tagüeña, Natalia, and Torres Cubillas, Luz Alicia 2018 Walking the Desert, Paddling the Sea: Comcaac Mobility in Time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 49:146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendiola, Galván Francisco 2008 Espacio, territorio y territorialidad simbólica. Casos de la arqueología del Norte de México. Noesis 33(17):13–44.Google Scholar
Teresa, Morales Lersch, and Ocampo, Cuauhtémoc Camarena 2005 Museos comunitarios de Oaxaca: Memoria comunal para combatir el olvido. Revista Arqueología Mexicana 12(72):72–77.Google Scholar
Cáceres, Navarrete, Carlos, A. 1978 Temas de pesadilla y realidad en la arqueología mexicana. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos 24(2):147–151.Google Scholar
Navarrete Linares, Federico 2009 La construcción histórica de la discriminación étnica. In Justicia, Desigualdad y Exclusión 3, edited by Castro, Elisabetta Di, pp. 237–282. UNAM, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Pitblado, Bonnie L. 2014 An Argument for Ethical, Proactive, Archaeologist–Artifact Collector Collaboration. American Antiquity 79:385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitblado, Bonnie L., Shott, Michael J., Brosowske, Scott, Butler, Virginia L., Cox, Jim, Espenshade, Christopher, Neller, Angela J., et al. 2018 Process and Outcomes of the SAA “Professional Archaeologists, Avocational Archaeologists, and Responsible Artifact Collectors Relationships Task Force” (2015–2018). SAA Archaeological Record 18(5):14–17.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Rodríguez, Lidia, I., and Hernández, Gerardo Almaguer 2019 Interdisciplina y arqueología comunitaria en la protección del patrimonio arqueológico. Boletín Antropológico 37(97):36–56.Google Scholar
Smith, Laurajane 2004 Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, Susan L., and Griesemer, James R. 1989 Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19:387–420.Google Scholar
Tengö, Maria, Hill, Rosemary, Malmer, Pernilla, Raymond, Christopher M., Spierenburg, Marja, Danielsen, Finn, Elmqvist, Thomas, and Folke, Carl 2017 Weaving Knowledge Systems in IPBES, CBD and Beyond—Lessons Learned for Sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27:17–25.Google Scholar
Canchola, Villalpando, Elisa, M. 2014 La apertura para visita pública de Cerro de Trincheras, Sonora. Anales de Antropología 48(2):97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Joe E. 2000 Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar