Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T17:22:50.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact on Vectran/Epoxy composites: Experimental and numerical analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2022

S.I.B. Syed Abdullah*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, 14300 Penang, Malaysia
L. Iannucci
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK
E.S. Greenhalgh
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK
F. Yusof
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, 14300 Penang, Malaysia
*
*Correspondence author. Email: syedidros86@gmail.com

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a plane-stress damage model based on the Classical Lamination Theory (CLT), developed for polymer fibre-based composite. The proposed numerical model utilises a damage mechanics methodology coupled with fracture mechanics to predict composite failure, particularly under quasi-static and dynamic loadings. In addition, the proposed constitutive equations consider a single secant modulus to describe its tensile and compressive modulus, as opposed to the physically proposed tier models for polymer fibres which possesses a ‘skin-core’ structure. The result of single element and coupon-level modelling showed excellent correlation with the experimental results. In addition, it was also found that the proposed numerical model showed considerable accuracy on the response of the composite under low and high velocity impact loadings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ladeveze, P. and LeDantec, E. Damage modelling of the elementary ply for laminated composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1992, 43, (3), pp 257267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzenmiller, A., Lubliner, J. and Taylor, R.L. A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites, Mech. Mater., 1995, 20, (2), pp 125152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K.V. and Vaziri, R. Application of a damage mechanics model for predicting the impact response of composite materials, Comput. Struct., 2001, 79, (10), pp 9971011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannucci, L.D.R., Willows, M. and Degrieck, J. A failure model for the analysis of thin woven glass composite structures under impact loadings, Comput. Struct., 2001, 79, (8), pp 785799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannucci, L. and Ankersen, J. An energy based damage model for thin laminated composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2006, 66, (7-8), pp 934951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannucci, L. and Willows, M. An energy based damage mechanics approach to modelling impact onto woven composite mateirals - Part I: Numerical models, Computers: Part A, 2006, 37, (11), pp 20412056.Google Scholar
Iannucci, L. and Willows, M. An energy based damage mechanics approach to modelling impact onto woven composite materials - Part II: Experimental and numerical results, Computers: Part A, 2007, 38, (2), pp 540554.Google Scholar
Iannucci, L., Pope, D.J. and Dalzell, M. A constitutive model for Dyneema UD composites, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM17), Edinburgh, UK, 2009.Google Scholar
Syed Abdullah, S.I.B., Iannucci, L., Greenhalgh, E.S. and Ahmad, Z. A plane-stress damage model for vectran laminated composite, Appl. Compos. Mater., 2021, 28, pp 12551276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdullah, S.I.B.S. Low velocity impact testing on laminated composites, in Impact Studies on Composite Materials, Singapore, Springer, 2021, pp 118.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM D7136/D7136M-15: Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fibre-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.Google Scholar
Syed Abdullah, S.I.B., Iannucci, L. and Greenhalgh, E.S. On the translaminar fracture toughness of Vectran/Epoxy composite material, Compos. Struct., 2018, 202, pp 566577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syed Abdullah, S.I.B., Iannucci, L., Greenhalgh, E.S. and Abdullah, N.A. The delamination behaviout of Vectran/Epoxy composites having a novel Non-Crimp Fabric architecture, Compos. B: Eng., 2022, 228, pp 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinho, S.T. Modelling failure of laminated composites using physically-based failure models, Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, London, UK, 2005.Google Scholar
Syed Abdullah, S.I.B., Iannucci, L., Greenhalgh, E.S. and Ahmad, Z. The impact performance of Vectran/Epoxy composite laminates with a novel non-crimp fabric architecture, Compos. Struct., 2021, 265, pp 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potluri, P., Hogg, P., Arshad, M., Jetavat, D. and Jamshidi, P. Influence of fibre architecture on impact damage tolerance in 3D woven composites, Appl. Compos. Mater., 2012, 19, (5), pp 799812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazzard, M.K., Hallett, S., Curtis, P.T., Iannucci, L. and Trask, R.S. Effect of fibre orientation on the low velocity impact response of thin Dyneema composite laminates, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2016, 88, pp 227237.Google Scholar
Bogenfeld, R., Kreikemeier, J. and Wille, T. Review and benchmark study on the analysis of low-velocity impact on composite laminates, Eng. Failure Analy., 2018, 86, pp 7299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, M., Chen, W. and Weerassoriya, T. Mechanical properties of Kevlar KM2 single fibre, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2005, 127, (2), pp 197203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sockalingam, S., Bremble, R., Gillespie, W. and Keefe, M.J. Transverse compression behaviour of Kevlar KM2 single fibre, Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manufact., 2016, 81, pp 271281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamini, S. and Young, R.J. The mechanical properties of epoxy resins: Part 1 - mechanisms of plastic deformation, J. Mater. Sci., 1980, 15, pp 814822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvet, C., Castanie, B., Bizeul, M. and Barrau, J.J. Low velocity impact modelling in laminate composite panesl with discrete interface elements, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2009, 46, (14-15), pp 28092821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, V. Literature survey of strain rate effects on composites, Swerea SICOMP, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.Google Scholar
Tan, V.B.C., Zeng, X.S. and Shim, V.P.W. Characterization and constitutive modelling of Aramid fibres at high strain rates, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2008, 35, (11), pp 13031313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurusideswar, S., Srinivasan, N., Velmurugan, R. and Gupta, N.K. Tensile response of Epoxy and S2-Glass/Epoxy composites at low and medium strain rate regimes, Proc. Eng., 2017, 173, pp 686693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J. and Welsh, L. Effect of strain rate on the tensile failure of woven reinforced polyester resin composites, J. Phys. Coll., 1985, 46, pp 405414.Google Scholar
Daniel, I.M. and Liber, T. Strain rate effects on mechanical properties of fibre composites, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 1976.Google Scholar
Zhu, D., Mobasher, B., Erni, J., Bansal, S. and Rajan, S.D. Strain rate and gauge length effects on tensile behaviour of Kevlar 49 single yarn, Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manufact., 2012, 43, (11), pp 20212029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. and Xia, Y.M. The effects of strain rate on the mechanical behaviour of Kevlar fibre bundle: An experimental and theoretical study, Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manufact., 1998, 29, (11), pp 14111415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, S.C. and Kim, T.W. High strain rate impact in Kevlar-woven composites and fracture analysis using acoustic emission, Compos. B: Eng., 2014, 60, pp 125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Termonia, Y. Effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of composites with a weak fibre/matrix interface, J. Mater. Sci., 2014, 60, pp 48784882.Google Scholar
Zeng, J. and Netravali, N. Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals: Coppper/Tungsten and Copper/Molybdenum, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2012, 20, (5), pp 387409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyanagi, J., Ogihara, S., Nakatani, H., Okabe, T. and Yoneyama, S. Mechanical properties of fibre/matrix interface in polymer matrix composites, Adv. Comp. Mater., 2014, 23, (5-6), pp 551570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maimi, P., Camanho, P.P., Mayugo, J.A. and Davila, C.G. A continuum damage model for composite laminates. Part I - Constitutive model, Mech. Mater., 2007, 39, (10), pp 897908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maimi, P., Camanho, P.P., Mayugo, J. and Davila, C.G. A continuum damage model for composite laminates. Part II - Computational implementation and validation, Mech. Mater., 2007, 39, (10), pp 909919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LSTC. (LSTC), “LS-Dyna Manual Volume II.,” LSTC, Livermore, CA, 2018.Google Scholar