Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T19:35:27.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dignity equals distance? Pursuing dignity in care for older adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2021

Agnete Meldgaard Hansen Open the ORCID record for Agnete Meldgaard Hansen [Opens in a new window]
Agnete Meldgaard Hansen*
Affiliation:
Department of People and Technology, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark Email: agmeha@ruc.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores how dignity is articulated and pursued by care workers in two currently prominent policy initiatives seeking to reform Danish care services for older people. Based on ethnographic case studies of ‘reablement’ practices and the use of ‘welfare technologies’, the paper shows how these attempts to create dignified care services transform interactions between care recipients and care workers. The analysis is inspired by a socio-material perspective on dignity as ‘crafted’ and ‘co-laboured’ in daily practices, in an interplay between multiple human and non-human actors. In the cases studied, dignity is articulated as closely related to older people's increasing autonomy and independence of formal care, and is pursued through enhancing care recipients’ self-care ability, and through technological automation of care tasks. However, these articulations and pursuits of dignity do not stand alone. When everyday care practices are closely examined, dignity is also pursued by care workers as increased co-operation and equality between care workers and care recipients, as de-objectification, and as promotion of enjoyment and quality of life. In these practices, care is ambivalently positioned as both a potential threat to dignity, and as a prerequisite to achieving it. The paper concludes by discussing the risks of policy agendas pursuing a narrow understanding of dignity as simply independence of care.

Keywords

dignityautonomyreablementwelfare technologyindependencecarecare work
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 43 , Issue 5 , May 2023 , pp. 1003 - 1021
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, K and Kalman, H (2016) Strategies to handle the challenges of intimacy in night-time home care services. European Journal of Social Work 20, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinal, F, Glasby, J, Rostgaard, T, Tuntland, H and Westendorp, RGJ (2016) New horizons: reablement – supporting older people towards independence. Age and Ageing 45, 574–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attuyer, K, Gilroy, R and Croucher, K (2020) Establishing long-term research relationships with older people: exploring care practices in longitudinal studies. Age and Ageing 40, 1064–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bødker, MN, Christensen, U and Langstrup, H (2019) Home care as reablement or enabling arrangements? An exploration of the precarious dependencies in living with functional decline. Sociology of Health and Illness 41, 1358–1372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calnan, M, Tadd, W, Calnan, S, Hillman, A, Read, S and Bayer, A (2013) ‘I often worry about the older person being in that system’: exploring the key influences on the provision of dignified care for older people in acute hospitals. Ageing & Society 33, 465–485.Google Scholar
Casey, B, Oxley, H, Whitehouse, E, Antolín, P, Duval, R and Leibfritz, W (2003) Policies for an ageing society – recent measures and areas for further reform. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, OECD Economics Department Working Papers 369.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B (2007) Shadowing, and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, HM (2000) Fra kitler til eget tøj – Diskurser om professionalisme, omsorg og køn [From Smocks to Private Clothes – Discourses on Professionalism, Care and Gender] (PhD thesis). Institut for Statskundskab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Dahl, HM (2005) A changing ideal of care in Denmark: a different form of retrenchment? In Dahl, HM and Eriksen, TR (eds), Dilemmas of Care in the Nordic Welfare State – Continuity and Change. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
Dahle, R (2005) Dirty work in a Norwegian health context (the case of Norway). In Dahl, HM and Eriksen, TR (eds), Dilemmas of Care in the Nordic Welfare State – Continuity and Change. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 101–111.Google Scholar
Dahler, AM (2018) Welfare technologies and ageing bodies: various ways of practising autonomy. Rehabilitation Research and Practice 2018, 3096405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danish Government, Danish Regions, LGDK and Danish Agency for Digitisation (2013) Digital Welfare, Empowerment, Flexibility and Efficiency, Common Public Sector Strategy for Digital Welfare. Copenhagen: Danish Agency for Digitisation.Google Scholar
Doh, D, Smith, R and Gevers, P (2020) Reviewing the reablement approach to caring for older people. Ageing & Society 40, 1371–1383.Google Scholar
European Union (2016) European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Brussels: European Union.Google Scholar
Fangen, K (2010) Deltagende observasjon [Participant Observation], 2nd Edn. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
Frank, AW (2004) Dignity, dialogue, and care. Journal of Palliative Care 20, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, N (2016) Capitalism's crisis of care. Dissent 63, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, S and Rodeschini, G (2015) Caring as a collective knowledgeable doing: about concern and being concerned. Management Learning 47, 266–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilleard, C and Higgs, P (2000) Cultures of Ageing: Self, Citizen and the Body. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C and Higgs, P (2011) Ageing abjection and embodiment in the fourth age. Journal of Aging Studies 25, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, AM (2015) Rehabilitating Elderly Bodies and Selves – New Forms of Care Work, Professional Identity and Status in Rehabilitative Home Care (PhD thesis). Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.Google Scholar
Hansen, AM (2016) Rehabilitative bodywork: cleaning up the dirty work of homecare. Sociology of Health and Illness 38, 1092–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, AM and Grosen, SL (2019) Transforming bodywork in eldercare with wash-and-dry toilets. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9, S5, 49–67.Google Scholar
Hansen, AM and Kamp, A (2018) From carers to trainers: professional identity and body work in rehabilitative eldercare. Gender, Work and Organization 25, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, AM, Grosen, SL and Kamp, A (2018) Velfærdsteknologi mellem ansvar og distance [Welfare technology between liability and distance]. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv 20, 24–40.Google Scholar
Hedensted Municipality (2016) Nyt digitalt redskab optimerer den akutte sygdomspleje [New Digital Tool Optimises Acute Care]. Available at https://via.ritzau.dk/pressemeddelelse/nyt-digitalt-redskab-optimerer-den-akutte-sygdomspleje?publisherId=5704827&releaseId=9013085.Google Scholar
Hillman, A, Tadd, W, Calnan, S, Calnan, M, Bayer, A and Read, S (2013) Risk, governance and the experience of care. Sociology of Health & Illness 35, 939–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jönson, H (2016) Framing scandalous nursing home care: what is the problem? Ageing & Society 36, 400–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, J (2011) Health care politics in the age of retrenchment. Journal of Social Policy 40, 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, A, Obstfelder, A and Andersson, K (2019) Welfare technologies in care work. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9, S5, 1–12.Google Scholar
Killmister, S (2010) Dignity: not such a useless concept. Journal of Medical Ethics 36, 160–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirchhoff, JW and Karlsson, JC (2013) Expansion of output: organizational misbehaviour in public enterprises. Economic and Industrial Democracy 34, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korczynski, M (2013) Touching moments: an analysis of the skillful search for dignity within body work interactions. In Wolkowitz, C, Cohen, RL, Sanders, T and Hardy, K (eds), Body/Sex/Work – Intimate, Embodied and Sexualized Labour. Critical Perspectives on Work and Employment. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 28–42.Google Scholar
Laslett, P (1991) A Fresh Map of Life: The Emergence of the Third Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lee-Treweek, G (1997) Women, resistance and care: an ethnographic study of nursing auxiliary work. Work, Employment and Society 11, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leplege, A, Gzil, F, Cammelli, M, Lefeve, C, Pachoud, B and Ville, I (2007) Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disability & Rehabilitation 29, 1555–1565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, L, Calnan, M, Cameron, A, Seymour, J and Smith, R (2014) Identity in the fourth age: perseverance, adaptation and maintaining dignity. Ageing & Society 34, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macklin, R (2003) Dignity is a useless concept. British Medical Journal 327, 1419–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marhánková, JH (2011) Leisure in old age: disciplinary practices surrounding the discourse of active ageing. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 6, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meenan, H, Rees, N and Doron, I (2016) Towards Human Rights in Residential Care for Older Persons: International Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mendes, FR (2013) Active ageing: a right or a duty? Health Sociology Review 22, 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health and Care Services (2011) Regulation on Dignified Care for Older People (The Dignity Guarantee). Copenhagen: Ministry of Health and Care Services.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Senior Citizens (2017) Midtvejsevaluering af værdighedsmilliarden 2016 og 2017 [Mid-term Evaluation of the Dignity Billion 2016 and 2017]. Copenhagen: Ministry of Health and Senior Citizens.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (2011) Social Services Act. Copenhagen: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (2014) Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Copenhagen: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
National Dignity Council (2018) National Dignity Council. Available at https://www.dignityincare.org.uk/About/National_Dignity_Council/.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D (2013) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nordenfelt, L (2003) Dignity and the care of the elderly. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6, 103–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Nordenfelt, L (2004) The varieties of dignity. Health Care Analysis 12, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordenfelt, L (2009) Dignity in Care for Older People. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opinion Leader Research (2009) Department of Health Final Report on the Review of the Department of Health Dignity in Care Campaign. London: Opinion Leader Research.Google Scholar
Petersen, A, Graff, L, Rostgaard, T, Kjellberg, J and Kjellberg, PK (2017) Rehabilitering på ældreområdet [Reablement in Care for Older People]. Copenhagen: National Board of Health, VIVE.Google Scholar
Pinker, S (2008) The stupidity of dignity. The New Republic, May 28.Google Scholar
Pols, J (2012) Care at a Distance: On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Pols, J, Pasveer, B and Willems, D (2018) The particularity of dignity: relational engagement in care at the end of life. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabiee, P and Glendinning, C (2011) Organisation and delivery of home care re-ablement: what makes a difference? Health & Social Care in the Community 19, 495–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rambøll (2012) Demonstrationsprojekt Ældre- og Handicapvenlige toiletter [Demonstration Project: Elderly- and Handicap-friendly Toilets]. Odense, Denmark: National Board of Social Services.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, B (2004) Between endless needs and limited resources: the gendered construction of a greedy organization. Gender, Work and Organization 11, 506–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostgaard, T (2006) Constructing the care consumer: free choice of home care for the elderly in Denmark. European Societies 8, 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostgaard, T (2011) Care as you like it: the construction of a consumer approach in home care in Denmark. Nordic Journal of Social Research 2, special issue, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostgaard, T and Matthiessen, MU (2019) Hjælp til svage ældre [Help for Frail Older Persons]. Copenhagen: VIVE.Google Scholar
Shore, C and Wright, S (2011) Conceptualizing policy: technologies of governance and the politics of visibility. In Shore, C, Wright, S and Però, D (eds), Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power (EASA Series 14). New York, NY: Berghahn Books, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Stacey, CL (2005) Finding dignity in dirty work: the constraints and rewards of low-wage home care labour. Sociology of Health & Illness 27, 831–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Star, SL and Strauss, A (1999) Layers of silence, arenas of voice: the ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swane, CE (2003) ‘Hjälp till självhjälp’ som strategi i hemtjänsten [Help for self-help as a strategy in home care]. In Szebehely, M (ed.), Hemhjälp i Norden – illustrationer och reflektioner [Home Help in the Nordic Countries: Illustrations and Reflections]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, pp. 211–239.Google Scholar
The Danish Agency for Digitisation (2013) Danskernes holdning til digital velfærd [Danes’ Attitudes Towards Digital Welfare]. Copenhagen: The Danish Agency for Digitisation.Google Scholar
Tufte, P (2013) Is there time enough? Temporal resources and service performance in the Danish home care sector. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 3, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twigg, J (2000) Bathing: The Body and Community Care. Florence, KY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Twigg, J (2006) The Body in Health and Social Care. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twigg, J, Wolkowitz, C, Cohen, RL and Nettleton, S (2011) Conceptualising body work in health and social care. Sociology of Health and Illness 33, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weicht, B (2011) Embracing dependency: rethinking (in)dependence in the discourse of care. The Sociological Review 58, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilberforce, M, Challis, D, Davies, L, Kelly, MP, Roberts, C and Clarkson, P (2017) Person-centredness in the community care of older people: a literature-based concept synthesis. International Journal of Social Welfare 26, 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, V, Kinnear, D and Victor, C (2016) ‘It's the little things that count’: healthcare professionals’ views on delivering dignified care: a qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 72, 782–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolkowitz, C (2002) The social relations of body work. Work, Employment & Society 16, 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolkowitz, C (2006) Bodies at Work. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrede, S, Henriksson, L, Høst, H, Johansson, S and Dybbroe, B (eds) (2008) Care Work in Crisis – Reclaiming the Nordic Ethos of Care. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wærness, K (1984) The rationality of caring. Economic and Industrial Democracy 5, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar