Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T00:16:28.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeological Excavations in Hohokam Sites of Southern Arizona*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Alfred E. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Arizona State Museum, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Abstract

In 1963 archaeological investigations were conducted by the Arizona State Museum in a series of Hohokam sites on the Gila River Indian Reservation of south-central Arizona. Significant data were derived from two of the eight sites tested. One site, Arizona U:13:9, included two small villages. The earlier village was first occupied during the Snaketown phase, which is estimated to date between A.D. 300 and 500. Occupation continued through the Sacaton phase or until about A.D. 1100. The later village was occupied during two phases of the Classic period, or from A.D. 1100 to about 1450. At this ruin both inhumations and cremations, apparently contemporaneous, were found in a distinct burial zone. The patterning noted in the placement of these two types of burials is a new feature for the Hohokam Classic period. The other site, Arizona U:13:11, a small Soho phase village that was occupied between A.D. 1100 and 1300, is important for the support it adds to the establishment of a pattern of burial placement during the Classic period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Contribution to Highway Salvage Archaeology in Arizona, Number 5.

References

Ambler, J. R. 1961 Archaeological Survey and Excavations at Casa Grande National Monument, Arizona. Master's thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Breternitz, D. A. 1963 The Archaeological Interpretation of Tree-Ring Specimens for Dating Southwestern Ceramic Styles. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Ezell, P. H. 1963 Is There a Hohokam-Pima Culture Continuum? American Antiquity, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 61–6. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Gladwin, WinifreD and Gladwin, H. S. 1929 The Red-on-buff Culture of the Gila Basin. Medallion Papers, No. 3. Gila Pueblo, Globe.Google Scholar
Gladwin, H. S., Haury, E. W., Sayles, E. B., and Gladwin, Nora 1937 Excavations at Snaketown: Material Culture. Medallion Papers, No. 25. Gila Pueblo, Globe.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1945 The Excavation of Los Muertos and Neighboring Ruins in the Salt River Valley, Southern Arizona. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 24, No. 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1950 The Stratigraphy and Archaeology of Ventana Cave. University of New Mexico Press. Albuquerque, and University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hayden, J. D. 1957 Excavations, 1940, at University Indian Ruin. Southwestern Monuments Association, Technical Series, Vol. 5. Phoenix.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. E. and Wasley, W. W. 1961 Salvage Archaeology in the Painted Rocks Reservoir Area near Gila Bend, Western Arizona. Unpublished report prepared for the National Park Service, Arizona State Museum, Tucson.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, J. A. 1962 A Study of Black-on-white Painted Pottery in the Tonto Basin, Arizona. Master's thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Russell, Frank 1908 The Pima Indians. Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington.Google Scholar
Schroeder, A. H. 1952 A Brief Survey of the Lower Colorado River from Davis Dam to the International Border. National Park Service, Sante Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar