Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T19:05:02.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implications of New Radiocarbon Ages on Coiled Basketry from the Northern Great Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas J. Connolly*
Affiliation:
University of Oregon, Museum of Natural and Cultural History, Eugene, OR 97403-1224 (connolly@uoregon.edu)

Abstract

Coiled basketry dates to more than 8,000 years ago in the Eastern Great Basin and is found in the Western Basin by 4,500 years ago. In the Northern Great Basin, archaeological basketry is dominated by twineware; fewer than 20 fragments of coiled basketry have been reported. Coiling has long been thought to have appeared very late in the Northern Basin, and the perceived late presence of coiling in the north has been considered by some to be an indicator of a late Numic incursion from the south. Recent direct radiocarbon dating of fiber samples from the coiled specimens from the Northern Great Basin undermines the previous assumptions of a uniformly late age. Though rare, coiling has a consistent presence in the region for more than 2,500 years. Further, its distribution suggests that this technological influence may have derived primarily from eastern, rather than southern, sources.

Resumen

Resumen

Canastas espirales se remontan a más de 8,000 años atrás en el Great Basin Oriental, y se encuentran en el Great Basin Occidental de hace 4,500 años. En el Great Basin Norte, canastas arqueológicos son dominados de “twineware,” y menos de 20 fragmentos de canastas espirales han sido reportados. Antes se ha pensdo que las canastas espirales aparecieron muy tarde en Great Basin Norte, y la presencia percibidla que canastas espirales en el norte era una indicación de una incursión tarde de cultura Numic de el sur. Datación por radiocarbono défibras de las canastas espirales de el Great Basin Norte desafía las suposiciones de la edad tarde de las canastas en la región. Aunque es raro, canastas espirales tienen una presencia constante en la región desde hace más de 2,500 años. Además, la distribución sugiere que esta influencia tecnológica se pudo haber derivado principalmente del este, en vez del sur.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adovasio, James M. 1970 The Origin, Development and Distribution of Western Archaic Textiles and Basketry. Tebiwa: Journal of the Idaho State University Museum 13(2):140.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M. 1980 Prehistoric Basketry of Western North America and Mexico. In Early Native Americans: Prehistoric Demography, Economy and Technology, edited by D. L. Browman, pp. 341362. Mouton Publishers, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adovasio, James M. 1986a Artifacts and Ethnicity: Basketry as an Indicator of Territoriality and Population Movements in the Prehistoric Great Basin. In Anthropology of the Desert West: Essays in Honor of Jesse D. Jennings, edited by Carol J. Condie and Don D. Fowler, pp. 4388. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M. 1986b Prehistoric Basketry. In Great Basin: Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 11, edited by Warren L. d’Azevedo, pp. 194205. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M. 2010 Basketry Technology: A Guide to Identification and Analysis. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M., and Andrews, R. L. 1986 The Numic Speakers: Not Whence but When? In Perishable Industries from Dirty Shame Rockshelter, Malheur County, Oregon, by R. L. Andrews, J. M. Adovasio, and R. C. Carlisle, pp. 218222. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers No. 34. Eugene.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M., Andrews, R. L., and Carlisle, R. C. 1976 The Evolution of Basketry Manufacture in the Northern Great Basin. Tebiwa: Journal of the Idaho State University Museum 18(2):18.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M., Andrews, R. L., and Carlisle, R. C. 1986 Basketry. In Perishable Industries from Dirty Shame Rockshelter, Malheur County, Oregon, by R. L. Andrews, J. M. Adovasio, and R. C. Carlisle, pp. 1950. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers No. 34. Eugene.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M., Andrews, R. L., and Fowler, Catherine S. 1982 Some Observations on the Putative Fremont “Presence” in Southern Idaho. Plains Anthropologist 27(95):1927.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M., and Pedler, Davis R. 1994 A Tisket, a Tasket: Looking at the Numic Speakers Through the “Lens” of a Basket. In Across the West: Human Population Movement and the Expansion of the Numa, edited by David B. Madsen and David Rhode, pp. 114123. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Aikens, C. Melvin, Cole, David, and Stuckenrath, Robert 1977 Excavations at Dirty Shame Rockshelter, Southeastern Oregon. Tebiwa Miscellaneous Papers No. 4. Museum of Natural History, Idaho State University, Pocatello.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. L., Adovasio, J. M., and Carlisle, R. C. 1986 Perishable Industries from Dirty Shame Rockshelter, Malheur County, Oregon. Ethnology Monographs No. 9; University of Pittsburgh and University of Oregon Anthropological Papers No. 34. Eugene.Google Scholar
Bates, Craig D., and Bernstein, Bruce 1982 Regional Variation in Maidu Coiled Basketry Materials and Technology. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 4(2):187202.Google Scholar
Connolly, Thomas J. 1986 A Catalog of Prehistoric Basketry and Other Perishable Artifacts from Eastern Oregon. Manuscript on file at the Oregon State Museum of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
Connolly, Thomas J., and Barker, Pat 2008 Great Basin Sandals. In The Great Basin: People and Place in Ancient Times, edited by Catherine S. Fowler and Don D. Fowler, pp. 6873. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Cressman, Luther S. 1942 Archaeological Researches in the Northern Great Basin. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 538. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
d’Azevedo, Warren L. 1986 Introduction. In Great Basin: Handbook of North Americanlndians. Vol. 11, edited by Warren L.d’Azevedo, pp. 114. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Eiselt, B. Sunday 1997 Defining Ethnicity in Warner Valley: An Analysis of House and Home. Technical Report 97–2. Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
Fowler, Catherine S. 1994 Material Culture and the Proposed Numic Expansion. In Across the West: Human Population Movement and the Expansion of the Numa, edited by David B. Madsen and David Rhode, pp. 103113. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Fowler, Catherine S., and Cannon, William J. 1990 Perishables from Warner Valley, Oregon. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Great Basin Anthropological Conference, Reno.Google Scholar
Fowler, Catherine S., and Cannon, William J. 1992 Catlow Twine and Warner Valley Prehistory. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Great Basin Anthropological Conference, Boise.Google Scholar
Fowler, Catherine S., and Hattori, Eugene M. 2011 Exploring Prehistoric Trade in Western Great Basin Textiles. In Perspectives on Prehistoric Trade and Exchange in California and the Great Basin, edited by Richard E. Hughes, pp. 201220. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, Mary Lee, and Curtis, Kathleen 1995 Weavers of Tradition and Beauty: Basketmakers of the Great Basin. University of Nevada Press, Reno.Google Scholar
Hattori, Eugene M., and Fowler, Catherine S. 2009 Recent Advances in Great Basin Textile Research. In Past, Present and Future Issues in Great Basin Archaeology: Papers in Honor of Don D. Fowler, edited by Bryan Hockett, pp. 103124. Cultural Resource Series No. 20. Bureau of Land Management, Elko, Nevada.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Dennis, and Erlandson, Jon M. 1996 Olivella Grooved Rectangle Beads from a Middle Holocene Site in the Fort Rock Valley, Northern Great Basin. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 18(1):296302.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Dennis L., Largeaspada, Leah L., Largeaspada, Tony D., and McDonald, Mercy A. 2004 Early and Middle Holocene Ornament Exchange Systems in the Fort Rock Basin of Oregon. In Early and Middle Holocene Archaeology of the Northern Great Basin, edited by D. L. Jenkins, T. J. Connolly, and C. M. Aikens, pp. 251269. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers, 62. Museum of Natural History and Department of Anthropology, Eugene.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Dennis L., Skinner, Craig E., and Connolly, Thomas J. 2006 A View of Northern Great Basin Prehistory Through the Volcanic Glass Window. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Northwest Anthropological Conference, Seattle.Google Scholar
Jolie, Edward A., and Hattori, Eugene M. 2005 The Spread of Coiled Basketry in the Prehistoric Great Basin. Paper presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Salt Lake City. Electronic document, www.perishabletechnology.org/research.php.Google Scholar
Kuneki, Nettie, Thomas, Elsie, and Slockish, Marie 1982 The Heritage of Klickitat Basketry: A History an Art Preserved. Oregon Historical Society, Portland.Google Scholar
Lyons, William H., and Cummings, Michael L. 2002 Sources of Sandstone Artifacts and Pottery from Lost Dune, a Late Prehistoric Site in Harney County, Southeastern Oregon, U.S.A. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 17:717748.Google Scholar
Lyons, William H., Thomas, Scott P., and Skinner, Craig E. 2001 Changing Obsidian Sources at the Lost Dune and McCoy Creek Sites, Blitzen Valley, Southeast Oregon. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 23(2):273296.Google Scholar
Madsen, David B., and Rhode, David (editors) 1994 Across the West: Human Population Movement and the Expansion of the Numa. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Plager, Sharon, Plew, Mark G., and Willson, Christopher A. 2006 The Archaeology of Antelope Creek Overhang, Southeastern Oregon. Monographs in Archaeology Vol. 2. Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Boise.Google Scholar
Raab, Mark L., and Howard, William J. 2000 Modeling Cultural Connections Between the Southem Channel Islands and the Western United States: The Middle Holocene Distribution of Olivella Grooved Rectangle Beads. In Proceedings of the Fifth California Channel Islands Symposium, edited by David Brown, Kathryn Mitchell, and Henry Chaney, pp. 590597. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Schlick, Mary Dodds 1994 Columbia River Basketry: Gift of the Ancestors, Gift of the Earth. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
Stern, Theodore 1998 Columbia River Trade Network. In Plateau: Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 12, edited by Deward E. Walker, Jr., pp. 641652. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Thomas, Scott P., Loring, Jon, and Goheen, Andrew 1983 An Aboriginal Pottery Site in Southeastern Oregon. In Contributions to the Archaeology of Oregon 1981–1982, edited by Don E. Dumond, pp. 8298. Occasional Papers No. 2. Association of Oregon Archaeologists, Portland.Google Scholar
Vellanoweth, René L. 1995 New Evidence from San Nicolas Island Concerning the Distributions and Manufacture of Olivella Grooved Rectangle Beads. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 31(4):1322.Google Scholar
Vellanoweth, René L. 2001 AMS Radiocarbon Dating and Shell Bead Chronologies: Middle Holocene Trade and Interaction in Western North America. Journal of Archaeological Science 28:941950.Google Scholar