Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-19T12:39:24.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Method for Estimation of Live Weight of Fish from the Size of Skeletal Elements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Richard W. Casteel
Richard W. Casteel*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology,University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a quantitative method for estimating the total live weight of fish based upon linear measurement of various skeletal elements. The method has the advantage of being both highly accurate and indicating the confidence limits of the estimates. The method is based upon Sir D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson's concept of “… weigh[ing] the animal with a measuring-rod…” (Thompson 1917, in Bonner 1966:16).

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 1974 , pp. 94 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akazawa, T., and Watanabe, H. 1968 Restoration of body size of Jomon shell mound fish. VIII Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Proceedings: 193–197.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. 1949 Fitting a straight line when both variables are subject to error. Biometrics 5:207–212.Google Scholar
Bonner, J. T. (editor) 1966 On growth and form. Abridged edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Casteel, R. W. 1972 The use of fish remains in archaeology with special reference to the native freshwater and anadromous fishes of California. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Chaplin, R. E. 1965 Animals in archaeology. Antiquity 39:204–211.Google Scholar
Frizzell, D. L., and Dante, J. H. 1965 Otoliths of some early Cenozoic fishes of the Gulf Coast. Journal of Paleontology 39:687–718.Google Scholar
Hodges, S. D., and Moore, P. G. 1972 Data uncertainties and least squares regression. Applied Statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series C,28:185–195.Google Scholar
Messieh, S. N. 1972 Use of otoliths in identifying herring stocks in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence and adjacent waters. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Journal 29:1113–1118.Google Scholar
Priegel, G. R. 1963 Use of otoliths to determine length and weight of ancient freshwater drum in the Lake Winnebago area. Wisconsin Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 52:27–35.Google Scholar
Shawcross, W. 1967 An investigation of prehistoric diet and economy on a coastal site at Galatea Bay, New Zealand. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 33:107–131.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G., Roe, A., and Lewontin, R. C. 1960 Quantitative zoology. Harcourt, Brace and World, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. 1967 Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1969 Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Thompson, D'A. W. 1917 On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. E. 1953 A method of calculating the dietary percentage of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity 18:396–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, A. Jr., 1960 Length and weight of ancient freshwater drum, Aplodinotus grunniens, calculated from otoliths found in Indian middens. Copeia 1960:181–185 Google Scholar