Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T15:32:29.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mimbres Pottery, Births, and Gender: A Reconsideration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christopher T. Espenshade*
Affiliation:
TRC Garrow Associates, 3772 Pleasantdale Road, Suite 200, Atlanta, GA 30340

Abstract

In their 1996 article, Hegmon and Trevathan argue that the nature of birth scenes depicted on Mimbres pottery bowls provides insight into the gender of the pottery painters. Specifically, they argue that the birth position illustrated is extremely uncommon, suggesting that the potter(s) had not had exposure to birth episodes. Hegmon and Trevathan conclude that the potters were male. Their arguments are flawed by faulty premises and a severe misunderstanding of the nature of Mimbres art. A review of the evidence regarding birth-depiction bowls indicates that the images do not imply either male or female potters.

En su artículo de 1996, Hegmon y Trevathan sostienen que el tipo de escenas de nacimiento en tres cuencos de Mimbres indica el género de los pintores. Ellas sostienen que la posición del bebé durante el alumbramiento es muy rara, lo que indica que los pintores no acostumbraron presenciar el nacimiento humano. Hegmon y Trevathan concluyen que los pintores de los cuencos fueron hombres. Su razonamiento está debilitado por el uso de premisas falsas y por la falta de comprensión de la naturaleza del arte Mimbres. Una revisión de las escenas pintados en estos cuencos demuestra que las imágenes no representan el género de los pintores.

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Brody, J. J. 1977 Mimbres Painted Pottery. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Brody, J. J., Scott, C. J., and LeBlanc, S. A. 1983 Mimbres Pottery: Ancient Art of the American Southwest. Hudson Hills Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bunzel, R. L. 1972 The Pueblo Potter: A Study in the Creative Imagination of Primitive Art. Dover, New York. Originally published 1929, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Crown, P. L. and Wills, W. H. 1995 The Origins of Southwestern Ceramic Containers: Women's Time Allocation and Economic Intensification. Journal of Anthropological Research 51: 173186.Google Scholar
Derick, P. 1958 Analysis of the Human Figure Motif in North American Prehistoric Painted Pottery. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Dittert, A. E., Jr., and Plog, F. 1980 Generations in Clay: Pueblo Pottery of the American Southwest. Northland Press, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. W. (editors) 1991 Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hegmon, M” and Trevathan, W R. 1996 Gender, Anatomical Knowledge, and Pottery Production: Implications of an Anatomically Unusual Birth Depicted on Mimbres Pottery from Southwestern New Mexico. American Antiquity 61: 747754.Google Scholar
McGraw-Hill Book Company 1987 Encyclopedia of World Art. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Moulard, B. 1984 Within the Underworld Sky: Mimbres Ceramics in Context. Twelve Trees Press, Pasadena, California.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1991 Women and Prehistoric Pottery Production. In The Archaeology of Gender, edited by Walde, D. and Willows, N.D. pp. 436143. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference. Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (editors) 1991 The Archaeology of Gender. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference. Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Wright, R. P. 1991 Women's Labor and Pottery Production in Prehistory. In Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, edited by Gero, J. M. and Conkey, M.W. pp. 194223. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar