Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T17:16:05.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Myth and Mammoth in Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Loren C. Eiseley
Loren C. Eiseley*
Affiliation:
Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Traditions have an incalculable appeal to the human mind. Often tenuous, remote, impossible to prove, they are occasionally startling. The frustrated researcher upon some fascinating problem of human history which fails, otherwise, of solution comes again and again to the consideration of floating tales which seem to hold a kernel of truth, a hint—just a faint hint—of veracity masked in the trappings of legend. Such material may be used, but on the whole it is ghostly, disembodied, and unverifiable. Lacking corroboration, it fails to bring conviction. Often the tale has been borne by some single native who, long since disappeared into forest anonymity, is no longer available for questioning. His story may, however, have passed through several intermediate hands and be quoted in old books whose scholarship is naive. The result is that, use these sources as we may, we turn seriously to other more tangible means of establishing truth. Then, if the search languishes, we are prone to return, still captivated, to the tale spun long ago.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , October 1945 , pp. 84 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashe, Thomas 1806. Memoirs of Mammoth and Other Extraordinary and Stupendous Bones of Incognita, or Non-Descripl Animals Found in the Vicinity of the Ohio, Wabash, Illinois, Mississippi, Missouri, Osage and Red Rivers. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Ashley-Montagu, M. F. 1944. “An Indian Tradition Relating to the Mastodon.” American Anthropologist, Vol. 46.Google Scholar
Catesby, Mark 1743. The Natural History of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands.Google Scholar
Ford, P. L., ed. 1904. The Works of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 3. G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Howorth, H. H. 1887. The Mammoth and the Flood. London.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1929. From the Greeks to Darwin. Scribner's Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Rankin, John 1826. Historical Researches on the Wars and Sports of the Mongols and Romans; in which Elephants and wild beasts were employed or slain: and the remarkable local agreement of History with the Remains of such animals found in Europe and Siberia. London.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1942. “Beginnings of Vertebrate Paleontology in North America.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 86.Google Scholar
Speck, F. G. 1935. “Mammoth or Stiff-Legged Bear.” American Anthropologist, Vol. 37, pp. 159–163.Google Scholar
Strong, W. D. 1934. “North American Indian Traditions Suggesting a Knowledge of the Mammoth.” American Anthropologist, Vol. 36, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar
Weslager, C. A. 1943. “The Nanticoke Indians in Early Pennsylvania.” The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 67.Google Scholar