Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T11:25:16.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Efficacy at Work: The Connection between More Autonomous Forms of Workplace Organization and a More Participatory Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

J. Maxwell Elden
J. Maxwell Elden*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Technical University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carole Pateman (1970) argued that democratized industrial authority structures would require workers to develop precisely the skills and resources necessary for participation in political life beyond the workplace. She based her argument on a close analysis of classical democratic theory and the indirect empirical evidence available at the time concerning workplace-related political participation. Although a great deal of research in industrial psychology and sociology and organization behavior is available, none treats expressly political correlates of workplace democracy. Analysis of data from a new factory designed on the basis of semi-autonomous, self-managing work groups provides empirical evidence directly supporting Pateman. The analysis also results in empirically grounded scales that differentiate between work humanization and work democratization. The latter correlates significantly with a sense of political efficacy. Further research to support democratizing industrial authority structures seems warranted for a political science that would contribute to a more participatory politics.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , March 1981 , pp. 43 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agurén, Stefan, Hanssen, Reine, and Karlsson, K. G. (1976). The Volvo Kalmar Plant: The Impact of New Design on Work Organization. Stockholm: The Rationalization Council, SAF-LO.Google Scholar
Allardt, Erik (1976). “Work and Political Behavior.” In Dubin, R. (ed.), Handbook of Work, Organization and Society. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 807–36.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney (1963). The Civic Culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrecht, Biliana Cicin-Sain (1976). Politicizing the Poor. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ambrecht, Biliana Cicin-Sain (1975). “Work Organization and Adult Political Socialization.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Seattle.Google Scholar
Blauner, Robert (1964). Alienation and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Paul (1968). Industrial Democracy: The Sociology of Participation. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Bowers, David G. (1973). “OD Techniques and Their Results in 23 Organizations: The Michigan ICL Study.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 9: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bråten, Stein (1973). “Model Monopoly and Communication.” Acta Sociologica 2: 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald and Miller, Warren (1964). The Voter Decides. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip, Miller, Warren and Stokes, Donald (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cooper, Cary, and Mumford, Enid, eds. (1979). The Quality of Working Life: The European Experiment. London: Associated Business Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, Thomas G., and Malloy, E. S. (1977). Improving Productivity and the Quality of Work Life. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Davis, Louis E., and Cherns, Albert B., eds. (1975). The Quality of Working Life, 2 vols. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Louis, and Taylor, James, eds. (1979). Design of Jobs, 2nd ed. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear.Google Scholar
Elden, J. Maxwell (1976). Democracy at Work for a More Participatory Politics: Worker Self-Management Increases Political Efficacy and Participation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Elden, J. Maxwell (1979). “Three Generations of Work Democracy experiments in Norway; Beyond Classical Socio-Technical Systems Analysis.” In Cooper, Cary and Mumford, Enid (eds.), The Quality of Working Life: The European Experiment. London: Associated Business Press.Google Scholar
Emery, Fred E. (1959). “Characteristics of Socio-Technical Systems.” Tavistock Research Document No. 527. London: Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.Google Scholar
Emery, Fred E. (1977). The Emergence of a New Paradigm of Work. Canberra: Center for Continuing Education, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Emery, Fred E., and Phillips, Chris (1976). Living at Work. Camberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Emery, Fred E., and Thorsrud, Einar (1976). Democracy at Work: Report of the Norwegian Industrial Democracy Program. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Gardell, Bertil (1976a). Arbelsinnehåll och Livskvalitet [The Content of Work and the Quality of Life]. Stockholm: Prisma.Google Scholar
Gardell, Bertil (1976b). “Reactions at Work and their Influence on Non-Work Activities.” Human Relations 29: 885–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granel, Michael (1979). “The Volkswagenwerk AG Prosjekt.” In International Council for the Quality of Working Life, Working on the Quality of Working Life. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, Robert (1979). “Quality of Work Life—Learning from Tarrytown.” Harvard Business Review 57: 76–87.Google Scholar
Hacker, Winfried (1978). “Psychological Analysis and Design of Work Activities.” Nordick Psykologi 2: 114–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. Richard, and Suttle, J. Lloyd, eds. (1977). Improving Life at Work. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear.Google Scholar
Herbst, Philip G. (1962). Autonomous Group Functioning. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Herbst, Philip G. (1976). Alternatives to Hierarchies. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Council for the Quality of Working Life (ICQWL) (1979). Working on the Quality of Working Life: Developments in Europe. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
International Labor Office (ILO) (1979). New Forms of Work Organization, 2 vols. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Inkeles, Alex (1969). “Making Men Modern: On the Causes and Consequences of Individual Change in Six Developing Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 75: 208–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, D. (1975). “Beyond Job Enrichment: Work-place Democracy in Europe.” Working Papers for a New Society 2: 51–58.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. (1973). Job Power: Toward Blue and White Collar Democracy. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Karasek, Robert (1978). “Job Socialization: A Longitudinal Study of Work, Political and Leisure Activity.” Revised Working Paper No. 59. Stockholm: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Karasek, Robert (1976). The Impact of the Work Environment on Life Outside the Job. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Kohn, Melvin, and Schooler, Carmi (1973). “Occupational Experience and Psychological Functioning: An Assessment of Reciprocal Effects.” American Sociological Review 38: 97–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, Arthur (1965). Mental Health of the Industrial Worker. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lipsitz, Lewis (1964). “Work Life and Political Attitudes: A Study of Manual Workers.” American Political Science Review 58: 951–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuitty, Louis L. (1957). “Elementary Linkage Analysis for Isolating Orthogonal and Oblique Types and Typal Relevancies.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 17: 207–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhinney, William (1972). “Open Systems-Traditional Hierarchies: Strategic Questions for Developing Eupsychian Organizations.” Presented at the Quality of Working Life Conference, Arden House.Google Scholar
Meissner, Martin (1971). “The Long Arm of the Job: A Study of Work and Leisure.” Industrial Relations 10: 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbrath, Lester (1965). Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Mulder, Mauk (1971). “Power Equalization Through Participation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 16: 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Toole, James, ed. (1973). Work in America. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Stanley (1972). The Future of Work and Leisure. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1966). “Generalized Expectancies for Internal vs. External Control of Reinforcement.” Psychological Monographs 29: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B., Chance, June and Phares, Jerry (1972). Applications of Social Learning Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Seeman, Melvin (1975). “Alienation Studies.” Annual Review of Sociology 1: 91–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, Melvin (1967). “On the Personal Consequences of Alienation in Work.” American Sociological Review 32: 273–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, Harold, and Herrick, Neal (1972). Where Have All the Robots Gone? New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stymne, Bengt (1980). “Design Principles for a Participative Organization of Work.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 1: 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedish Employers Confederation (1975). Job Reform in Sweden: Conclusions from 500 Shop Floor Projects. Stockholm: Swedish Employers' Confederation Technical Department.Google Scholar
Taylor, James, and Bowers, David (1971). The Survey of Organizations: Towards a Machine-Scored, Standardized Questionnaire Instrument. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, Arnold, ed. (1968). Control in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Torbert, William C., and Rogers, Malcolm (1972). Being for the Most Part Puppets. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman.Google Scholar
Trist, E. L., Higgin, G. W., Murray, H., and Pollock, A. B. (1963). Organizational Choice: Capabilities of Groups at the Coal Face under Changing Technologies—The Loss, Rediscovery, and Transformatic of a Work Tradition. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Westlander, Gunnela (1976). Arbete och Livssituation [Work and Life Situation]. Stockholm: The Rationalization Council, LO-SAF.Google Scholar