No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Selecting for Masculinity: Women’s Under-Representation in the Republican Party
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2024
Abstract
The gap between women’s representation in the Democratic and Republican parties has grown significantly in the last three decades. We argue existing explanations undervalue voters’ contributions to this trend by focusing on voter responses to candidate sex rather than candidate gender. We theorize that Republican voters (especially the most conservative) prefer masculine candidates in intraparty and entry-level elections. Because sex and gender are correlated, this limits the number of Republican women who advance through the political pipeline. Experimental vignettes from two rounds of the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (N = 2,000) and two large surveys of Republicans (N > 10,000) show that Republican (but not Democratic) voters penalize candidates with “feminine” self-presentation regardless of the candidate’s sex. Original data on the self-presentation of Republican candidates for entry-level office (N = 459) confirm Republican candidates often present themselves in gender-stereotypical ways. In short, voters play an underappreciated role in the partisan gap in women’s representation.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Banwart, Mary Christine, and Winfrey, Kelly L.. 2013. “Running on the Web: Online Self-Presentation Strategies in Mixed-Gender Races.” Social Science Computer Review 31 (5): 614–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbara Lee Family Foundation. 2016. “Politics Is Personal: Keys to Likeability and Electability for Women.” Research Memo. https://www.barbaraleefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/BLFF-Likeability-Memo-FINAL-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Cassese, Erin C.. 2017. “American Party Women: A Look at the Gender Gap within Parties.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (1): 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2015. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates.” Political Psychology 36 (6): 691–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020a. “Running Local: Gender Stereotyping and Female Candidates in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 56 (1): 96–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020b. “Shifting Standards: How Voters Evaluate the Qualifications of Female and Male Candidates.” The Journal of Politics 82 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020c. The Qualifications Gap: Why Women Must Be Better Than Men to Win Political Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, Amanda, and Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth. 2017. “Sex Isn’t Gender: Reforming Concepts and Measurements in the Study of Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 39 (4): 1019–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackless, Melanie, Charuvastra, Anthony, Derryck, Amanda, Fausto-Sterling, Anne, Lauzanne, Karl, and Lee, Ellen. 2000. “How Sexually Dimorphic Are We? Review and Synthesis.” American Journal of Human Biology 12 (2): 151–66.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blau, Francine D., Brummund, Peter, and Liu, Albert Yung-Hsu. 2013. “Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System.” Demography 50 (2): 471–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boatright, Robert G., and Sperling, Valerie. 2019. Trumping Politics as Usual: Masculinity, Misogyny, and the 2016 Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, Christine E., and Rossi, Peter H.. 1983. “Gender and Jobs: Prestige Standings of Occupations as Affected by Gender.” American Sociological Review 48 (3): 316–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W., Han, Hahrie, and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2011. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Clyde. 1994. “Judgments about the Capabilities of City Councillors and Support for Female Representation on City Council.” The Social Science Journal 31 (4): 355–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Clyde, Heighberger, Neil R., and Shocket, Peter A.. 1993. “Gender-Based Differences in Perceptions of Male and Female City Council Candidates.” Women & Politics 13 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman’s Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. “Gender Trouble, Feminist Theory, and Psychoanalytic Discourse.” Chapter 13 in Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda J.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas. 2016. “Why Are There so Few Working-Class People in Political Office? Evidence from State Legislatures.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 4 (1): 84–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Barnes, Tiffany D.. 2019. “Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races.” Political Behavior 41 (3): 677–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, Meredith. 2016. Masculinity, Media, and the American Presidency. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Conroy, Meredith. 2018. “Strength, Stamina, and Sexism in the 2016 Presidential Race.” Politics & Gender 14 (1): 116–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, Meredith, and Green, Jon. 2020. “It Takes a Motive: Communal and Agentic Articulated Interest and Candidate Emergence.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (4): 942–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2007. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences and Priorities.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 390–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2018. “Can’t Buy Them Love: How Party Culture among Donors Contributes to the Party Gap in Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, and Trounstine, Jessica. 2015. “Electoral Institutions, Gender Stereotypes, and Women’s Local Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 318–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, and Trounstine, Jessica. 2020. “Voting Can Be Hard, Information Helps.” Urban Affairs Review 56 (1): 124–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2014. “A Partisan Gap in the Supply of Female Potential Candidates in the United States.” Research & Politics 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014537230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, R., Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, & Representation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Deason, Grace, Greenlee, Jill S., and Langner, Carrie A.. 2015. “Mothers on the Campaign Trail: Implications of Politicized Motherhood for Women in Politics.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1): 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Doan, Alesha E., and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2010. “The Role of Intersectional Stereotypes on Evaluations of Gay and Lesbian Political Candidates.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2005. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (1): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Lynch, Timothy. 2013. “It Takes a Survey: Understanding Gender Stereotypes, Abstract Attitudes, and Voting for Women Candidates.” American Politics Research 42 (4): 656–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Lynch, Timothy. 2016. “The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Voting for Women Candidates by Level and Type of Office.” Politics & Gender 12 (3): 573–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekstrand, Laurie E., and Eckert, William A.. 1981. “The Impact of Candidate’s Sex on Voter Choice.” The Western Political Quarterly 34 (1): 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, Laurel. 2014. “Contrasting Party Dynamics: A Three Decade Analysis of the Representation of Democratic versus Republican Women State Legislators.” The Social Science Journal 51 (3): 377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fowler, Linda L. 1996. “Who Runs for Congress?” PS : Political Science & Politics 29 (3): 430–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Smith, Eric R. A. N.. 1998. “The Role of Candidate Sex in Voter Decision-Making.” Political Psychology 19 (2): 405–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Katie L., and Heyse, Amy L.. 2014. “Depoliticizing Feminism: Frontier Mythology and Sarah Palin’s ‘The Rise of The Mama Grizzlies.’” Western Journal of Communication 78 (1): 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golebiowska, Ewa A. 2001. “Group Stereotypes and Political Evaluation.” American Politics Research 29 (6): 535–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 908–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Steretyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny, and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2015. “A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Juliana, Parker, Kim, and Stepler, Renee. 2017. “Wide Partisan Gaps in U.S. Over How Far the Country Has Come on Gender Equality.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/10/Gender-Equality-Report-FINAL-10.18.pdf.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993a. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993b. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Monson, J. Quin, and Preece, Jessica Robinson. 2017. “How to Elect More Women: Gender and Candidate Success in a Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (4): 927–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2015. “Who Caucuses? An Experimental Approach to Institutional Design and Electoral Participation.” British Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 329–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., J. Quin Monson, Tyson King-Meadows, and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2021. “What Leads Racially Resentful Voters to Choose Black Candidates?” The Journal of Politics 83 (1): 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Monson, J. Quin, Preece, Jessica R., and Aldridge, Alejandra. 2023. “Replication Data for: Selecting for Masculinity: Women’s Under-Representation in the Republican Party.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z0IGLS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, David C., and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Patricia A., and Coppock, Alexander. 2018. “Candidate Choice without Party Labels.” Political Behavior 40 (3): 571–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchens, Karin E., and Swers, Michele L.. 2016. “Why Aren’t There More Republican Women in Congress? Gender, Partisanship, and Fundraising Support in the 2010 and 2012 Elections.” Politics & Gender 12 (4): 648–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2015. “Female Candidates and Legislators.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 349–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Pearson, Kathryn. 2006. “The Primary Reason for Women’s Under-Representation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Working Paper, Institute of Governmental Studies. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qv019hj.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Weaver, Christopher L.. 2016. “Religion and Secularism among American Party Activists.” Politics & Religion 9 (2): 271–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindqvist, Anna, Sendén, Marie Gustafsson, and Renström, Emma A. 2020. “What Is Gender, Anyway: A Review of the Options for Operationalising Gender.” Psychology & Sexuality 12 (4): 1–13.Google Scholar
Madsen, Jens Koed. 2019. “Voter Reasoning Bias When Evaluating Statements from Female and Male Political Candidates.” Politics & Gender 15 (2): 310–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, Kate. 2017. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2016. Masculinity, Femininity, and American Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. 2014. “The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters.” Political Behavior 37: 357–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Sarah, and Conroy, Meredith. 2020. Who Runs?: The Masculine Advantage in Candidate Emergence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John R., Benoit, William L., and Hansen, Glenn J.. 2003. “Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952-2000.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 599–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., Tolbert, Caroline J., and Donovan, Todd. 2011. Why Iowa?: How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve the Presidential Nominating Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reher, Stefanie. 2021. “How Do Voters Perceive Disabled Candidates?” Frontiers in Political Science 2: 634432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigueur, Leah Wright. 2016. The Loneliness of the Black Republican: Pragmatic Politics and the Pursuit of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “If US Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 3 (1/2): 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. 2022. “The Heightened Importance of Racism and Sexism in the 2018 US Midterm Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F., MacWilliams, Matthew, and Nteta, Tatishe. 2018. “Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism.” Political Science Quarterly 133 (1): 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C. 2014. “The Effects of Gender-Bending on Candidate Evaluations.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 35 (1): 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2019. “The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics.” Political Psychology 40: 173–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., Holman, Mirya R., Diekman, Amanda B., and McAndrew, Thomas. 2016. “Power, Conflict, and Community: How Gendered Views of Political Power Influence Women’s Political Ambition.” Political Psychology 37 (4): 515–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2016. “Gender Roles, Motherhood, and Politics: Conservative Women’s Organizations Frame Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 37 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Susanne, Hunt, William, and Coppock, Alexander. 2018. “What Have We Learned about Gender From Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-Analysis of 30 Factorial Survey Experiments.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1986. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.” The American Historical Review 91 (5): 1053–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharrow, Elizabeth A., Strolovitch, Dara Z., Heaney, Michael T., Masket, Seth E., and Miller, Joanne M. 2016. “Gender Attitudes, Gendered Partisanship: Feminism and Support for Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton among Party Activists.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 37 (4): 394–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Eric R. A. N., and Fox, Richard L.. 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalsburg, Brittany L., and Kleinberg, Mona S.. 2016. “‘A Mom First and a Candidate Second’: Gender Differences in Candidates’ Self-Presentation of Family.” Journal of Political Marketing 15 (4): 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle. 2015. “Why So Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance of Women in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 295–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle, and Swers, Michele L.. 2017. “Which Women Can Run? Gender, Partisanship, and Candidate Donor Networks.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (2): 449–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, Lisa, and Ferree, Myra Marx. 2019. Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Wineinger, Catherine. 2019. “How Can a Black Woman Be a Republican? An Intersectional Analysis of Identity Claims in the 2014 Mia Love Campaign.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 9 (3): 566–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Nicholas J. G. 2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior 32 (4): 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Karpowitz et al. supplementary material
File
182.4 KB