Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:58:59.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“This Hearing Should Be Flipped”: Democratic Spectatorship, Social Media, and the Problem of Demagogic Candor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2022

BORIS LITVIN Open the ORCID record for BORIS LITVIN [Opens in a new window]
BORIS LITVIN*
Affiliation:
Stetson University, United States
*
Boris Litvin, Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Stetson University, United States, blitvin@stetson.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How concerning should it be that most citizens encounter political life chiefly as audiences? Facing this fact, democratic theorists increasingly respond by reconceptualizing “the spectator” as an empowered agent. Yet this response risks overlooking how evolving forms of media reconstitute audiences in ways that undermine efforts to ascribe agency to any given spectating activity. To illustrate this problem, I consider Jeffrey Green’s idealization of candor, which holds spectators to be empowered when leaders are denied scripted appearances. In contrast, I show that social media occasion a case of irreverent candor wherein spectators claim authenticity by derailing online conversations, thereby valorizing a kind of unscriptedness that perpetuates outgroup marginalization and facilitates demagogy. Paradoxically, such candor disempowers spectators while rendering them more “active” agents. I thus argue that empowerment requires audiences to interrogate their own spectating practices—a possibility I locate in Hannah Arendt’s thought and interactions surrounding Black Lives Matter protests.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 153 - 167
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abizadeh, Arash. 2007. “On the Philosophy/Rhetoric Binaries: Or, Is Habermasian Discourse Motivationally Impotent?” Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (4): 445–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2014. Our Declaration: A Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Anker, Elisabeth. 2014. Orgies of Feeling: Melodrama and the Politics of Feeling. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1973. The Origin of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 2006. “Truth and Politics.” In Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, 223–59. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Baldwin-Philippi, Jessica. 2019. “The Technological Performance of Populism.” New Media & Society 21 (2): 376–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickford, Susan. 1996. The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, and Citizenship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, Mary Angela. 2016. “Film the Police! Cop-Watching and Its Embodied Narratives.” Journal of Communication 66 (1): 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1955. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Butsch, Richard. 2008. The Citizen Audience: Crowds, Publics, and Individuals. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 2009. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?” Political Theory 37 (3): 323–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Aylon. 2022. “The Inter-Est between Us: Ontology, Epistemology, and the Failure of Political Representation.” Contemporary Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-022-00559-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Jenny L., Love, Tony P., and Killen, Gemma. 2018. “Seriously Funny: The Political Work of Humor on Social Media.” New Media & Society 20 (10): 3898–3916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1986. “Declarations of Independence.” New Political Science 7 (1): 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2010. “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2021. Making Constituencies: Representation as Mobilization in Mass Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Andrew. 2014. Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feola, Michael. 2017. “The Body Politic: Bodily Spectacle and Democratic Agency.” Political Theory 46 (2): 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2017. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs about Politics.” Political Psychology 38 (S1): 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forestal, Jennifer. 2021. “Beyond Gatekeeping: Propaganda, Democracy, and the Organization of Digital Publics.” Journal of Politics 83 (1): 306–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forestal, Jennifer. 2017. “The Architecture of Political Spaces: Trolls, Digital Media, and Deweyan Democracy.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 149–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Jason. 2018. “Populism Isn’t the Problem.” Boston Review, August 15. http://bostonreview.net/politics/jason-frank-populism-not-the-problem.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. 2009. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. 2011. “The Rhetoric Revival in Political Theory.” The Annual Review of Political Science 14: 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Rob. 2018. “The Deliberative Sublime: Edmund Burke on Disruptive Speech and Imaginative Judgment.” American Political Science Review 112 (2): 267–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Jeffrey Edward. 2010. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Jeffrey Edward. 2016. The Shadow of Unfairness: A Plebeian Theory of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Taussig, Doron. 2017. “Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction: The Rhetorical Signature of Donald J. Trump.” Political Science Quarterly 132 (4): 619–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1776. Declaration of Independence.Google Scholar
Kapust, Daniel J., and Schwarze, Michelle A.. 2016. “The Rhetoric of Sincerity: Cicero and Smith on Propriety and Political Context.” American Political Science Review 110 (1): 100–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meme, Know Your. 2021. “Youtube Apology Videos.” Accessed December 12, https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/youtube-apology-videos.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1993. The Phantom Public. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Mac, Ryan, and Warzel, Charlie. 2018. “Congratulations, Mr. President: Zuckerberg Secretly Called Trump after the Election.” Buzzfeed News, July 19. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/congratulations-zuckerberg-call-trump-election-2016.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Steve, Nolan, Jason, and Wellman, Barry. 2003. “Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments.” Surveillance & Society 1 (3): 331–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2017. “Anonymous Glory.” European Journal of Political Theory 16 (1): 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Elizabeth. 2006. “The Trouble with Being Earnest: Deliberative Democracy and the Sincerity Norm.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3): 249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massanari, Adrienne. 2017. “#Gamergate and the Fappening: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures.” New Media & Society 19 (3): 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn. 1984. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (2): 151–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Ryan M. 2016. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, Bryce Clayton. 2019. “Context, Visibility, and Control: Police Work and the Contested Objectivity of Bystander Video.” New Media & Society 21 (1): 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Whitney, and Milner, Ryan M.. 2017. The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Whitney. 2015. This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Robin, Corey. 2017. The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Sean. 2019. “Fake News: A Global Epidemic Vast Majority (86%) of Online Global Citizens Have Been Exposed to It.” Ipsos. June 11. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/cigi-fake-news-global-epidemic.Google Scholar
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Google Scholar
Smith, Zadie. 2010. “Generation Why?” The New York Review of Books, November 25. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2010/11/25/generation-why/.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon. 2019. “Statement to the House Judiciary Committee on the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund.” (Speech, Washington, DC, June 11, 2019). https://americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jonstewart911firstresponders.htm.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2017. # Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Verge. 2021. “The Peace Reporters.” Accessed May 20, 2021, https://www.theverge.com/21355122/police-brutality-violence-video-effects-trauma-civil-rights-black-lives-matter.Google Scholar
The Washington Post. 2016. “Transcript of the New Hampshire GOP Debate, Annotated.” February 6. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/06/transcript-of-the-feb-6-gop-debate-annotated/.Google Scholar
Thucydides. 1963. History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. Rex Warner. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Vosoughi, Soroush, Roy, Deb, and Aral, Sinan. 2018. “The Spread of True and False News Online.” Science 359 (6380): 1146–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, Bradley E., and Bowers, G. Bret. 2015. “Memes as Genre: A Structurational Analysis of the Memescape.” New Media & Society 17(11): 1886–1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.