Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T12:18:42.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavioral Responses to Amphetamines in Identical Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

John C. Crabbe*
Affiliation:
Research Service (151), VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, and Departments of Medical Psychology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health Sciences University
Lissy F. Jarvik
Affiliation:
Psychogeriatric Unit, VA Medical Center, Brentwood, Los Angeles Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences
Edward H. Liston
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences
Donald J. Jenden
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles
*
Research Service (151P), VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97201, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Male, monozygotic twins (six pairs) were repeatedly tested before and after d-amphetamine, l-amphetamine, or placebo administration. Drug effects on cognitive, psychomotor, personality, mood, and pain variables were assessed. Members of a twin pair tended to respond similarly on several tests under placebo conditions, indicating genetic determination of the behavioral variables. In addition, cotwins tended to show similar responses to amphetamine as measured by one test of cognitive function, by several mood and personality variables (hostility, autonomic arousal, friendliness, feelings of tension and loss of control), and tended to have similar plasma levels of both amphetamine isomers. Although shared environmental effects cannot be ruled out, the results are consistent with genetic mediation of a variety of behavioral effects of amphetamines.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1983

References

REFERENCES

1.Alexanderson, B, Evans, D, Sjoqvist, F (1969): Steady-state plasma levels of nortryptilene in twins: Influence of genetic factors and drug therapy. Br Med J 4:764768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Broadhurst, PL (1978): “Drugs and the Inheritance of Behavior.” New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
3.Cascorbi, HF, Vesell, ES, Blake, DA, Helrich, M (1971): Genetic and environmental influence on halothane metabolism in twins. Clin Pharmacol Ther 12:5055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3a.Cho, AK, Lindeke, B, Hodshon, BJ, Jenden, DJ (1973): Deuterium substituted amphetamine as an internal standard in a gas chromatographic mass spectrometric (GCMS) assay for amphetamine. Annal Chem 45:570574.Google Scholar
4.Crabbe, JC, Belknap, JK (1980): Genetics as a tool to evaluate drug dependence. Subst Ale Actions/Misuse 1:385413.Google Scholar
5.Crumpacker, DW, Cederlof, R, Friberg, L, Kimberling, WJ, Sorensen, S, Vandenberg, SG, Williams, JS, McClearn, GE, Grever, B, Iyer, H, Krier, MJ, Pedersen, NL, Price, RA, Roulette, I (1979): A twin methodology for the study of genetic and environmental variation in human smoking behavior. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:173195.Google Scholar
6.Feingold, L (1950): A psychometric study of senescent twins. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
7.Goodwin, DW (1980): The genetics of alcoholism. Subst Ale Actions/Misuse 1:101117.Google Scholar
8.Jarvik, LF, Simpson, JH, Guthrie, D, Liston, EH (1981): Morphine, experimental pain, and psychological reactions. Psychopharmacology 75:124131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Kalow, W (1962): “Pharmacogenetics: Heredity and the Response to Drugs.” Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
10.Kalow, W (1971): Topics in pharmacogenetics. Ann NY Acad Sci 179:654659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Kirk, R (1968): “Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences.” Belmont, California: Brooks-Cole, p 269.Google Scholar
12.Liston, EH, Simpson, JH, Jarvik, LF, Guthrie, D (1981): Morphine in identical twins. In: “Advances in Twin Research,” Vol 3. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp 105116.Google Scholar
13.Patrick, RL (1977): Amphetamine and cocaine: Biological mechanisms. In Barchas, JD, Berger, PA, Ciaranello, RD, Elliott, GR (eds): “Psychopharmacology: From Theory to Practice.” New York: Oxford University Press, pp 331340.Google Scholar
14.Propping, P (1977): Genetic control of ethanol action on the central nervous system. An EEG study in twins. Hum Genet 35:309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Propping, P (1978): Alcohol and alcoholism. Hum Genet (Suppl) 1:91.Google Scholar
16.Raskin, A, Schulterbrandt, JG, Reatig, N, McKeon, JJ (1970): Differential response to chlorpromazine, imipramine and placebo: A study of subgroups of hospitalized depressed patients. Arch Gen Psychiatr 23:164173.Google Scholar
17.Sachar, EJ (1978): Neuroendocrine responses to psychotropic drugs. In Lipton, MA, DiMascio, A, Killam, KF (eds): “Psychopharmacology: A Generation of Progress.” New York: Raven Press, pp 499507.Google Scholar
18.Vesell, E, Passananti, T, Greene, F, Page, J (1971): Genetic control of drug levels and the induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes in man. Ann NY Acad Sci 179:752772.Google Scholar
19.Vesell, ES (1975): Pharmacogenetics. Biochem Pharmacol 24:445450.Google Scholar
20.Wechsler, D (1955): “Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.” New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
21.Winer, B (1971): “Statistical Principles in Experimental Design,” 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, p 546.Google Scholar
22.Wolff, BB, Kantor, TG, Jarvik, ME, Laska, E (1966): Reponse of experimental pain to analgesic drugs. I. Morphine, aspirin and placebo. Clin Pharmacol Ther 7:224238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Woodrow, KM, Reifman, A, Wyatt, RJ (1978): Amphetamine psychosis—A model for paranoid schizophrenia. In Haber, B, Aprison, MH (eds): “Neuropharmacology and Behavior.” New York: Plenum Press, pp 122.Google Scholar