Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T18:01:58.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Etiology of Human Dizygotic Twinning With Special Reference to Spontaneous Abortions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Denis Hémon ,
Colette Berger  and
Philippe Lazar
Denis Hémon
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Epidémiologiques et Statistiques sur l'Environnement et la Santé, INSERM, Villejuif, France
Colette Berger
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Epidémiologiques et Statistiques sur l'Environnement et la Santé, INSERM, Villejuif, France
Philippe Lazar
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Epidémiologiques et Statistiques sur l'Environnement et la Santé, INSERM, Villejuif, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The comparison of 622 twin and 622 singleton births allowed us to confirm the association of dizygotic twinning with maternal age, parity, and maternal weight and height, as well as the occurrence of unlike-sex twins in the mother's family. It was also shown that none of these associations, except for maternal height, can be explained by the others. Dizygotic twinning was also found to be negatively correlated with previous use of oral contraceptives and with irregularity of menstrual cycle. Finally, the relationship between spontaneous abortion in previous pregnancies and maternal exposure to medical irradiation was investigated.

Keywords

AbortionOral contraceptivesDizygotic twinningPelvic irradiationMaternal ageParityMaternal height and weight
Type
Session I: Incidence and Factors of Twinning
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , October 1979 , pp. 252 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1979

References

REFERENCES

1. Alberman, E, Polani, PE, Fraser Roberts, JA, Spicer, CC, Elliott, M, Armstrong, E, Dhadial, RK (1972): Parental X-irradiation and chromosome constitution in their spontaneously aborted foetuses. Ann Hum Genet 36:185–193.Google Scholar
2. Alberman, E, Polani, PE, Fraser Roberts, JA, Spicer, CC, Elliott, M, Armstrong, E (1972): Parental exposure to X-irradiation and Down's syndrome. Ann Hum Genet 36:195–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Allen, G, Schachter, J (1971): Ease of conceptions in mothers of twins. Soc Biol 18:18–27.Google Scholar
4. Bean, JA, Leeper, JD, Wallace, RB, Sherman, BM, Jagger, H (1979): Variations in the reporting of menstrual histories. Am J Epidemiol 109:181–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Boue, A, Boue, J (1973): Evaluation des erreurs chromosomiques au moment de la conception. Biomedicine 18:372–374.Google Scholar
6. Bulmer, MG (1959): The effect of parental age, parity and duration of marriage on the twinning rate. Am Hum Genet 23:454–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Bulmer, MG (1970): “The Biology of Twinning in Man.” Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
8. Bulmer, MG (1976): Is Weinberg's method valid? Acta Genet Med Gemellol 25:25–28.Google Scholar
9. Bracken, MB (1979): Oral contraception and twinning: an epidemiologic survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 4:432–434.Google Scholar
10. Hertig, AT (1967): The overall problem in man. In Benirschke, K (ed): “Comparative Aspects of Reproductive Failures.” Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp 11–41.Google Scholar
11. Lazar, P (1976): Effets des avortements spontanés sur la fréquence des naissances gémellaires. CR Acad Sc Paris 282:243–246.Google Scholar
12. Levi, S (1976): Ultrasonic assessment of the high rate of human multiple pregnancy in the first trimester. J Clin Ultrasound 4:3–5.Google Scholar
13. MacGillivray, I, Nylander, PPS, Corney, G (1975): “Human Multiple Reproduction.” Washington London: WB Saunders.Google Scholar
14. Podge, C (1972): Increasing the reproductive potential in farm animals. In Austin, CR, Short, RV (eds): “Reproduction in Mammals. 5. Artificial Control of Reproduction.” Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
15. Record, AG, Armstrong, E, Lancashire, AJ (1978): A study of the fertility of mothers of twins. J Epidemiol Commun Health 32:183–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Roberts, CJ, Lowe, CR (1975): Where have all the conceptions gone? Lancet 498–499.Google Scholar
17. Robinson, HP, Caines, JS (1977): Sonar evidence of early pregnancy failure in patients with twin conceptions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84:22–25.Google Scholar
18. Rothman, KJ (1977): Fetal loss, twinning and birth weight after oral contraceptive use. N Engl J Med 468–471.Google Scholar
19. Stewart, A, Hewitt, D (1970): Relevance of twin data to intrauterine selection. Acta Genet Med Gemeilol 19:83–86.Google Scholar
20. Treolar, A et al (1967): Variations of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life. Int J Fertil 12:77–126.Google Scholar
21. Varma, TR (1979): Ultrasound evidence of early pregnancy failure in patients with multiple conceptions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86:290–292.Google Scholar
22. Vessey, M, Doll, R, Peto, R, Johnson, B, Wigging, P (1976): A long term follow up study of women using different methods of contraception. An interim report. J Biosoc Sci 8:373–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Vollman, RF (1977): “The Menstrual Cycle.” Philadelphia, London, Toronto: WB Saunders.Google ScholarPubMed
24. Wyshak, G (1978): Statistical findings on the effects of fertility drugs on plural births. In Nance, WE (ed): “Twin Research: Biology and Epidemiology.” New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc., pp 17–33.Google Scholar