Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T20:20:09.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foetal Twin Ultrasound Biometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

L. Schneider
Affiliation:
Service de Gynécologie—Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
R. Bessis
Affiliation:
Service de Gynécologie—Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
J. L. Tabaste
Affiliation:
Service de Gynécologie—Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
M. F. Sarramont
Affiliation:
Service de Gynécologie—Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
N. Japhet
Affiliation:
Service de Gynécologie—Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Biparietal diameter growth differs considerably in the twin gestation compared to the singleton gestation; thus the use of a specific standard is recommended. A shift toward lower values is noticed in monochorial twins. In the case of the abdominal diameter growth, instead, no significant difference is found between twins and singletons.

Type
Session III: Management of Twin Pregnancy
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1979

References

REFERENCES

1. Leroy, B, Lefort, F, Neveu, P, Risse, RJ (1978): Poids et taille des jumeaux à la naissance. In Rabat, (ed): “27 ème Congrès de la Fèdèration des Sociétés de Gynécologie—Obstétrique de Langue Française.” Paris: Edition Masson, pp 2124.Google Scholar
2. Schneider, L, Bessis, R, Tabaste, JL, Sarramont, MF, Papiernik, E, Baudet, J, Pontonnier, G (1977): Echographic survey of twin foetal growth: A plea for specific charts for twins. In Nance, WE (ed): “Twin Research: Clinical Studies.” New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc., pp 137141.Google Scholar