Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T21:43:04.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical Capacity in Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Lars-Magnus Engström  and
Siv Fischbein
Lars-Magnus Engström
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Research, School of Education, Stockholm, Sweden
Siv Fischbein*
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Research, School of Education, Stockholm, Sweden
*
Department of Educational and Psychological Research, School of Education, S-100 26 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A comparison of physical capacity, (measured by vital capacity, muscular strength and physical work capacity) in twin boys and controls failed to indicate significant differences. Intrapair correlations showed the MZ twins to be much more similar than the DZ twins in all the capacity measures. The correlations were lower, however, for both MZ and DZ twins for physical work capacity than for the other two capacity variables. When amount of physical exercise during leisure time is kept under control, the DZ twins tend to be more similar for physical work capacity or muscular strength, and the correlations tend to be of the same magnitude for MZ twins. Physical work capacity therefore appears, in this study, to be a more environmentally influenced variable than either vital capacity or muscular strength.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 159 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1977

References

REFERENCES

Astrand, P.-O., Rodahl, K. 1970. Textbook of Work Physiology. New York: Me Graw Hill.Google Scholar
Drillien, C.M. 1964. The growth and development of the prematurely born infant. Edinburgh and London: E. and S. Livingstone Ltd.Google Scholar
Ekblom, B. (1969). Effect of physical training in adolescent boys. J. Appl. Physiol., 27: 350–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekblom, B. (1970). Effect of physical training on circulation during prolonged severe exercise. Acta Physiol. Scand., 78: 145–158.Google Scholar
Engström, L.-M. 1976. Physical activity during adolescence. Presented at the international congress on “Sport and the Total Development of the Youth”, Hyvinkää, Finland, November 20-22, 1975. Research report No. 2. Stockholm: Department of Educational Research, School of Education.Google Scholar
Eriksson, B.O. 1972. Physical training, oxygen supply and muscle metabolism in 11-13-year old boys. Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl., 384.Google Scholar
Essen-Möller, E. (1941). Empirische Ähnlichkeitsdiagnose bei Zwillingen. Hereditas, 27: 1–50.Google Scholar
Fischbein, S., Lindgren, G. 1975. Height and weight of twins and their controls from 10-18 years [in Swed.]. Report No. 12. Stockholm: Department of Educational Research, School of Education.Google Scholar
Fuller, L., Thompson, W.R. 1960. Behavior Genetics. New York and London: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A.V. 1950. The dimensions of animals and their muscular dynamics. Sci. Prog. (London), 38: 209–230.Google Scholar
Husén, T. 1959. Psychological Twin Research. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Husén, T. (1960). Abilities of twins. Scand. J. Psychol., 1: 125–135.Google Scholar
Klissouras, W. 1975. Twin studies on functional capacity. Presented to the Symposium on “Genetic and Non-genetic Components in Physiological Variability”. London, England, 28 11 1975. (Mimeographed).Google Scholar
Koch, H. 1966. Twins and Twin Relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ljung, B.-O. 1966. The difference of correlated intra-pair variances [in Swed.]. Report No. 17. Stockholm: Department of Educational Research, School of Education.Google Scholar
Ljung, B.-O., Bergsten-Brucefors, A., Lindgren, G. (1974). The secular trend in physical growth in Sweden. Ann. Hum. Biol., 1: 245–256.Google Scholar
Ljung, B.-O., Fischbein, S., Lindgren, G. 1977. Physical growth in twins and controls of matched age followed longitudinally from 10 to 18 years. Paper submitted to Ann. Hum. Biol.Google Scholar
Me Miken, D.F. 1976. Maximum aerobic power and physical dimensions of children. Ann. Hum. Biol., 3: 141:147.Google Scholar
Medlund, P., Cederlöf, R., Floderus-Myrhed, B., Friberg, L., Sörensen, S. 1976. A new Swedish twin registry. Acta Med. Scand. Suppl., 600.Google Scholar
Mittler, P. 1971. The Study of Twins. England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Norinder, Y. 1946. Twin Differences in Writing Performance. A Study of Heredity and School Training. Lund: Hakan Ohlsson.Google Scholar
Saltin, B., Blomqvist, G., Mitchell, J.H., Johnson, R.L. Jr., Wildenthal, K., Chapman, C.B. 1968. Response to exercise after bedrest and training. Circulation, 38, Suppl. VII.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, S.G. 1965. Multivariate analysis of twin differences. In Vandenberg, S.G. (ed.): Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genetics. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Venerando, A., Milani-Comparetti, M. (1970). Twin studies in sport and physical performance. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 19: 80–82.Google Scholar
Wilde, G.J.S. (1970). An experimental study of mutual behavior imitation and person perception in MZ and DZ twins. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 19: 273–279.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.S. 1974 a. Twins: Measures of birth size at different gestational ages. Ann. Hum. Biol., 1: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R.S. 1974 b. Growth standards for twins from birth to four years. Ann. Hum. Biol., 1: 175–188.Google Scholar