Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T13:38:03.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Docking the value of pigmeat? Prevalence and financial implications of welfare lesions in Irish slaughter pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

S Harley ,
LA Boyle ,
NE O’Connell ,
SJ More ,
DL Teixeira  and
A Hanlon
S Harley
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Neston, Cheshire CH64 7TE, UK
LA Boyle
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Centre, Teagasc Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, Republic of Ireland
NE O’Connell
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Food Security, Northern Ireland Technology Centre, Queens University Belfast, Malone Road, Belfast BT9 5HN, UK
SJ More
Affiliation:
UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
DL Teixeira*
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Centre, Teagasc Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, Republic of Ireland
A Hanlon
Affiliation:
UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: dayane.teixeira@teagasc.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Expansion of the meat inspection process to incorporate animal-based welfare measurements could contribute towards significant improvements in pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) welfare and farm profitability. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of different welfare-related lesions on the carcase and their relationship with carcase condemnations (CC) and carcase weight (CW). The financial implications of losses associated with CC and CW reductions related to the welfare lesions were also estimated. Data on tail lesions, loin bruising and bursitis, CW and condemnation/trimming outcome (and associated weights) were collected for 3,537 slaughter pigs (mean [± SEM] carcase weight: 79.2 [± 8.82] kg). Overall, 72.5% of pigs had detectable tail lesions, whilst 16.0 and 44.0% were affected by severe loin bruising and hind limb bursitis, respectively. There were 2.5% of study carcases condemned and a further 3.3% were trimmed. The primary cause of CC was abscessation. While tail lesion severity did not increase the risk of abscessation, it was significantly associated with CC. Male pigs had a higher risk of tail lesions and of CC. The financial loss to producers associated with CC and trimmings was estimated at €1.10 per study pig. CW was reduced by up to 12 kg in cases of severe tail lesions. However, even mild lesions were associated with a significant reduction in CW of 1.2 kg. The value of the loss in potential CW associated with tail lesions was €0.59 per study pig. Combined with losses attributable to CC and trimmings this represented a loss of 43% of the profit margin per pig, at the time of the study, attributable to tail biting. These findings illustrate the magnitude of the impact of tail biting on pig welfare and on profitability of the pig industry. They also emphasise the potential contribution that the inclusion of welfare parameters at meat inspection could make to pig producers in informing herd health and welfare management plans.

Keywords

animal welfarecarcaseeconomicsmeat inspectionpigtail biting
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 2014 , pp. 275 - 285
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alban, L, Steenberg, B, Stephensen, FT, Olsen, A-M, and Petersen, JV 2011 Overview on current practices of meat inspection in the EU. Scientific Report submitted to EFSA pp 8–12. EFSA: Parma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
AusVet Animal Health Services 2009 Epi tools-sample size calculations. Australian Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre. http://epitools.ausvet.com.au/content.php?page=SampleSizeGoogle Scholar
Bonde, M, Rousing, T, Badsberg, JH, and SØrensen, JT 2004 Associations between lying-down behaviour problems and body condition, limb disorders and skin lesions of lactating sows housed in farrowing crates in commercial sow herds. Livestock Production Science 87: 179–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprod-sci.2003.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BPEX 2012 EU costs of pig meat production. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board: Warwickshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Cleary, E 2012 Pig Price and Pig Market Report. Irish Farmers’ Association. 16 May 2012. http://irishpigs.wordpress.comGoogle Scholar
Cleveland-Nielsen, A, Christensen, G and ErsbØll, AK 2004 Prevalences of welfare-related lesions at post-mortem meat-inspection in Danish sows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 64: 123–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.05.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conte, S, Boyle, LA, Lawlor, PG and O’Connell, NE 2010 Influence of within pen gender composition and weight variation on the welfare and growth performance of finishing pigs. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science and the Agricultural Research Forum p 184. 12 April 2010, Belfast, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohoo, I, Martin, W and Stryhn, H 2003 Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. AVC Inc: CanadaGoogle Scholar
EFSA 2011 Technical specifications on harmonised epidemiological indicators for public health hazards to be covered by meat inspection of swine. EFSA: Parma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare 2007 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from Commission on the risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems. EFSA Journal 611: 1–13Google Scholar
Ellerbroek, LP, Mateus, A, Stärk, K, Alonso, S and Lindberg, A 2011 Contribution of meat inspection to animal health surveil-lance in swine. EFSA Journal 9: 80Google Scholar
Faucitano, L 2001 Causes of skin damage to pig carcasses. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81: 39–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/A00-031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, CE, Kilbride, AL, Ossent, P and Green, LE 2008 A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and associated risk factors for bursitis in weaner, grower and finisher pigs from 93 commer-cial farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 83: 308–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, S, More, S, Boyle, L, O’Connell, N and Hanlon, A 2012a Good animal welfare makes economic sense: potential of pig abat-toir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool. Irish Veterinary Journal 65: 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-65-11Google Scholar
Harley, S, More, S, O’Connell, N, Hanlon, A, Teixeira, D and Boyle, L 2012b Evaluating the prevalence of tail biting and carcase condemnations in slaughter pigs in the Republic and Northern Ireland, and the potential of abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool. Veterinary Record 171: 621–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.100986Google Scholar
Heinonen, M, Orro, T, Kokkonen, T, Munsterhjelm, C, Peltoniemi, O and Valros, A 2010 Tail biting induces a strong acute phase response and tail-end inflammation in finishing pigs. The Veterinary Journal 184: 303–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.02.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinonen M, Peltoniemi O and Valros 2013 Impact of lame-ness and claw lesions in sows on welfare, health and production. Livestock Science 156: 2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huey, R 1996 Incidence, location and interrelationships between the sites of abscesses recorded in pigs at a bacon factory in Northern Ireland. The Veterinary Record 138: 511–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.21.511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, EJ, Jones, TA, Guise, HJ and Penny, RHC 1999 Tail biting in pigs 1: the prevalence at six UK abattoirs and the relationship of tail biting with docking, sex and other carcass damage. Pig Journal 43: 18–32Google Scholar
Irish Central Statistics Office 2012 Livestock Slaughterings. Irish Central Statistics Office: Dublin, Republic of IrelandGoogle Scholar
Keeling, L and Veissier, I 2005 Developing a monitoring system to assess welfare quality in cattle, pigs and chickens. In: Butterworth, A (ed) Proceedings of the Science and Society Improving Animal Welfare pp 46–50. Welfare Quality: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Keeling, LJ, Wallenbeck, A, Larsen, A and Holmgren, N 2012 Scoring tail damage in pigs: an evaluation based on recordings at Swedish slaughterhouses. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 54:32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-54-32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilbride, AL, Gillman, CE and Green, LE 2009 A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of lameness in finishing pigs, gilts and pregnant sows and associations with limb lesions and floor types on commercial farms in England. Animal Welfare 18: 215–224Google Scholar
Kilbride, AL, Gillman, CE, Ossent, P and Green, LE 2008 A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and associated risk factors for capped hock and the associations with bursitis in weaner, grower and finisher pigs from 93 commercial farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 83: 272–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kritas, SK and Morrison, RB 2007 Relationships between tail-biting in pigs and disease lesions and condemnations at slaughter. Veterinary Record 160: 149–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.160.5.149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, C, Bruce, J, Fowler, V and English, P 1995 A compari-son of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Livestock Production Science 43: 265–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(95)00050-UGoogle Scholar
Main, D, Whay, H, Leeb, C and Webster, A 2007 Formal ani-mal-based welfare assessment in UK certification schemes. Animal Welfare 16: 233–236Google Scholar
Marques, BMF, Bernardi, ML, Coelho, CF, Almeida, M, Morales, OE, Mores, TJ, Borowski, SM and Barcellos, DE 2012 Influence of tail biting on weight gain, lesions and condemnations at slaughter of finishing pigs. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 32: 967–974. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X201200 1000003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, J, Jaro, PJ, Aduriz, G, Gómez, EA, Peris, B and Corpa, JM 2007 Carcass condemnation causes of growth retard-ed pigs at slaughter. The Veterinary Journal 174: 160–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.05.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarland, EG, Mamanee, P, Queale, WS and Cosgarea, AJ 2000 Management of the olecranon and pre-patellar bursitis in athletes. Physician Sports Medicine 28: 40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moinard, C, Mendl, M, Nicol, C and Green, L 2003 A case con-trol study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 333–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00276-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouttotou, N, Green, L and Hatchell, F 1998 Adventitious bursitis of the hock in finishing pigs: prevalence, distribution and association with floor type and foot lesions. Veterinary Record 142:109–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.142.5.109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullan, S, Edwards, S, Butterworth, A, Whay, H and Main, D 2011 A pilot investigation of possible positive system descrip-tors in finishing pigs. Animal Welfare 20: 439–449Google Scholar
Nielsen, A 2011 Data warehouse for assessing animal health, wel-fare, risk management and – communication. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 53(1): S3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-53-S1-S3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydhmer, L, Zamaratskaia, G, Andersson, H, Algers, B, Guillemet, R and Lundström, K 2006 Aggressive and sexual behaviour of growing and finishing pigs reared in groups, without castration. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A56: 109-119Google Scholar
Sanchez-Vazquez, MJ, Nielen, M, Gunn, GJ and Lewis, FI 2011 National monitoring of Ascaris suum related liver pathologies in English abattoirs: a time-series analysis. Veterinary Parasitology 184: 83–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.08.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute Inc 1988 SAS/SAT User's Guide. Statistics Analysis Institute: Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
SchrØder-Petersen, DL and Simonsen, HB 2001 Tail-biting in pigs. The Veterinary Journal 162: 196–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2001.0605CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinisalo, A, Niemi, JK, Heinonen, M and Valros, A 2012 Tail biting and production performance in fattening pigs. Livestock Science 143: 220–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.019Google Scholar
Smith, WJ 1993 A Study of Adventitious Bursitis of the Hock. University of Edinburgh: UKGoogle Scholar
Smulders, D, Verbeke, G, Mormède, P and Geers, R 2006 Validation of a behavioral observation tool to assess pig welfare. Physiology & Behavior 89: 438–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spoolder, H, Bracke, M, Mueller-Graf, C and Edwards, S 2011 Report 2: Preparatory work for the future development of animal based measures for assessing the welfare of weaned, growing and fat-tening pigs. EFSA: Parma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Stärk, K 1996 Animal health monitoring and surveillance in Switzerland. Australian Veterinary Journal 73: 96–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb09985.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straw, B, Zimmerman, J, D’Allaire, S and Taylor, D 2006 Diseases of Swine. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Swaby, H and Gregory, NG 2012 A note on the frequency of gastric ulcers detected during post-mortem examination at a pig abattoir. Meat Science 90: 269–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, NR, Main, DCJ, Mendl, M and Edwards, SA 2010 Tail-biting: a new perspective. The Veterinary Journal 186: 137–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.028Google ScholarPubMed
Tuovinen, VK, Gröhn, Y and Straw, BE 1994 Partial condem-nations of swine carcasses: a descriptive study of meat inspection findings at southwestern Finland's cooperative slaughterhouse. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 19: 69–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(94)90040-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valros, A, Ahlström, S, Rintala, H, Häkkinen, T and Saloniemi, H 2004 The prevalence of tail damage in slaughter pigs in Finland and associations to carcass condemnations. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica – Section A: Animal Science 54: 213–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064700510009234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Weerd, H, Docking, C, Day, J and Edwards, S 2005 The development of harmful social behaviour in pigs with intact tails and different enrichment backgrounds in two housing sys-tems. Animal Science 80: 289–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/ASC40450289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velarde, A and Geers, R 2007 On Farm Monitoring of Pig Welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers: The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-591-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallgren, P and Lindahl, E 1996 The influence of tail biting on performance of fattening pigs. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 37: 453–460CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welfare Quality® 2009 Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs). Welfare Quality® Consortium: Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Willeberg, P, Gerbola, MA, Petersen, BK, and Andersen, JB 1984 The Danish pig health scheme: nationwide computer-based abattoir surveillance and follow-up at the herd level. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 3: 79–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(84)90026-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar