Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T13:27:44.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Human Contact on Heart Rate of Pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

R Geers ,
G Janssens ,
H Ville ,
E Bleus ,
H Gerard ,
S Janssens  and
J Jourquin
R Geers*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Buildings Research, KU Leuven, Kard. Mercierlaan 92, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
G Janssens
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Buildings Research, KU Leuven, Kard. Mercierlaan 92, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
H Ville
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Buildings Research, KU Leuven, Kard. Mercierlaan 92, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
E Bleus
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Buildings Research, KU Leuven, Kard. Mercierlaan 92, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
H Gerard
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Buildings Research, KU Leuven, Kard. Mercierlaan 92, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
S Janssens
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Buildings Research, KU Leuven, Kard. Mercierlaan 92, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
J Jourquin
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agricultural Buildings Research, KU Leuven, Kard. Mercierlaan 92, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium Seghers Hybrid, Buggenhout, Belgium
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pigs were selected at random from three lines (homozygous halothane positive, homozygous negative, and the heterozygotes). They were housed for four weeks within standardized environmental conditions with six pigs per pen corresponding to each of the three lines with two treatment combinations (6×3×2). Half of the pigs were allocated to routine care without humans entering the pen, while the other ones received an increased human contact treatment; animal-man interaction times were recorded. Before and after the four-week experimental period, pigs were housed individually for one day. A blood sample was taken for beta-endorphin analysis and heart rate was measured. The final heart rate measurements were continued during a transport of two hours. With respect to animal-man interaction times no clear treatment effect was observed. Increased human contact lowered the plasma beta-endorphin content to a greater extent as a function of time, while heart rate also became lower. The latter may result in an improved heart function during handling and transport. Differences with regard to the halothane gene were observed during housing conditions, but not during transport.

Keywords

animal-man interactionanimal welfarebeta-endorphinheart ratepigstransport
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , November 1995 , pp. 351 - 359
Copyright
© 1995 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold-Meeks, C and McGIone, J J 1986 Validating techniques to sample behavior of confined young pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britt, B A 1979 Malignant hyperperexia. Federation Proceedings 38: 44–48Google Scholar
Dalin, A-M, Magnusson, U, Häggendal, J and Nyberg, L 1993 The effect of thiopentane-sodium anesthesia and surgery, relocation, grouping and hydrocortisone treatment on the blood levels of Cortisol, corticosteroid binding globulin, and catecholamines in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 1902–1908Google ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R and Mormede, P 1983 Stress in farm animals: a need for réévaluation. Journal of Animal Science 57: 6–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fordham, D P, Lincoln, G A, Ssewannyana, E and Rodway, R G 1989 Plasma beta-endorphin and Cortisol concentrations in lambs after handling, transport and slaughter. Animal Production 49: 103–107Google Scholar
Freund, R J and Littell, R C 1981 SAS for Linear Models. SAS Institute: Cary, USAGoogle Scholar
Geers, R, Bleus, E, Van Schie, T, Ville, H, Gerard, H, Janssens, S, Nackaerts, G, Decuypere, E and Jourquin, J 1994 Transport of pigs different with respect to the halothane gene: stress assessment. Journal of Animal Science 72: 2552–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geers, R, Goedseels, V, Parduyns, G, Nijns, P, Wouters, P and Bosschaerts, L 1990 Integrated control of air and floor temperature in piglet houses: animal and engineering aspects. Annales de Zootechnie 39: 19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, F and Taylor, H L 1965 Adaptive changes in the heart, vessels and patterns of control under chronically high loads. In: Handbook of Physiology. Circulation pp 2615-2677. American Physiological Society: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, A L and Hutson, G D 1990 The effect of gentling on heart rate, flight distance and aversion of sheep to a handling procedure. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H and Barnett, J L 1992 The effects of early contact with humans on the subsequent level of fear of humans in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H, Barnett, J L and Hansen, C 1987 The influence of inconsistent handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessing, M J C 1994 Individual Behavioural Characteristics in Pigs and Their Consequences for Pig Husbandry. PhD Thesis, Agricultural University, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Hessing, M J C, Hagelso, A M, Schouten, W G P, Wiepkema, P R and van Beek, JAM 1994 Individual behavioural and physiological strategies in pigs. Physiology & Behavior 55: 39–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLennan, D H and Philips, M S 1992 Malignant hyperthermia. Science 256: 789–795CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, J J, Silak, J L, Lumpkin, E A, Nicholson, R L, Gibson, M and Norman, R L 1993 Shipping stress and social status effects on pig performance, plasma Cortisol, natural killer cell activity and leucocyte numbers. Journal of Animal Science 71: 888–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKirnan, M D, Gray, C G and White, F C 1991 Effects of feeding on muscle blood flow during prolonged exercise in miniature swine. Journal of Applied Physiology 70: 1097–1104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss R (Editor) 1982 Transport of Animals Intended for Breeding, Production and Slaughter. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, P J 1995 The causative mutation for porcine stress syndrome. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 17: 257–269Google Scholar
Pearce, G P and Paterson, A M 1993 The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peronnet, F, Perrault, H, Cleroux, J, Cousineau, D, Nadeau, R, Pham-Huy, H, Tremblay, G and Lebeau, R 1980 Electro- and echocardiographic study of the left ventricle in man after training. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 45: 125–130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodway, R G, AI-Gantani, S and Fordham, D P 1993 Stress and plasma beta-endorphin in sheep. In: Parvizi, N (ed) Opoids in Farm Animals pp 181–206. Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH: Münster-Hiltrup, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Ruelcker, C 1968 The influence of physical training and short-time physical stress on colour, fluid loss, pH, ATP and glycogen of the gracilis muscle in pigs. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Supplement 24: 1–39Google Scholar
Schaeffer, A L, Sather, A P, Tong, AKW and Lepage, P 1989 Behaviour of pigs from three genotypes segregating at the halothane locus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, W and Rushen, J 1993 The role of endogenous opoids in stereotyped behaviour and in heart rate response in pigs. In: Parvizi, N (ed) Opoids in Farm Animals pp 207–219. Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH: Münster-Hiltrup, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Shaw, F D and Turne, R K 1990 Beta-endorphin as a stress indicator in the pig. Proceedings 11th IPVS Congress: 427Google Scholar
Ville, H, Bertels, S, Geers, R, Janssens, S, Goedseels, V, Parduyns, G, Van Bael, J, Goossens, K, Bosschaerts, L, de Ley, J and Heylen, L 1993 Electrocardiogram parameters of piglets during housing, handling and transport. Animal Production 56: 211–216Google Scholar
Weiss, J M 1971 Effects of coping behaviour in different warning signal conditions on stress pathology in rats. Journal Comparative Physiological Psychology 77: 1–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed