Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T19:02:40.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pushed to the limit: food abundance determines tag-induced harm in penguins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

RP Wilson*
Affiliation:
Swansea Lab for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
JE Sala
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional Patagónico-CONICET, Boulevard Brown 2915, Puerto Madryn (U9120ACD), Chubut, Argentina
A Gómez-Laich
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional Patagónico-CONICET, Boulevard Brown 2915, Puerto Madryn (U9120ACD), Chubut, Argentina
J Ciancio
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional Patagónico-CONICET, Boulevard Brown 2915, Puerto Madryn (U9120ACD), Chubut, Argentina
F Quintana
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional Patagónico-CONICET, Boulevard Brown 2915, Puerto Madryn (U9120ACD), Chubut, Argentina Wildlife Conservation Society, Amenabar 1595, (C1426AKC), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: r.p.wilson@swansea.ac.uk

Abstract

The energetic costs of animal movement change with body condition, although the consequences of this for foraging efficiency are rarely considered. We deployed externally attached devices to Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus), known to increase the costs of swimming via increased drag in a consistent manner, and noted, however, that foraging behaviour and efficiency varied dramatically between years. We used our results to construct an energetics-based model and found that small increases in drag due to the attachment of externally attached tags predicted accelerating harm as prey availability decreased, which accorded with our observations. This explains earlier observations of differential breeding success in tagged versus untagged penguins in particular years, highlights the importance of understanding how animal body condition may affect population processes in general and advocates caution in interpretations of tag-derived data over variable environmental conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2015 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannasch, R, Wilson, R and Culik, B 1994 Hydrodynamic aspects of design and attachment of a back-mounted device in penguins. Journal of Experimental Biology 194: 8396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Both, C, Bouwhuis, S, Lessells, C and Visser, ME 2006 Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441: 8183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciancio, JE, Pascual, MA and Beauchamp, DA 2007 Energy density of Patagonian aquatic organisms and empirical predictions based on water content. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 14151422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/T06-173.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J 1977 Energetic requirements for growth of the Jackass Penguin. Zoologica Africana 12: 201213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culik, B, Bannasch, R and Wilson, RP 1994 External devices on penguins: how important is shape? Marine Biology 118: 353357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00350291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugger, KM, Ballard, G, Ainley, DG and Barton, KJ 2006 Effects of flipper bands on foraging behavior and survival of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adelie). Auk 12: 858869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[858:EOFBOF]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, MG, Williams, KL, Veljacic, D, Jackson, JA and Knight, S 2000 Epibiont community succession on nesting Loggerhead Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta from Georgia, USA. Bulletin of Marine Science 62: 145155Google Scholar
Heezik, YV and Davis, L 2008 Effects of food variability on growth rates, fledging sizes and reproductive success in the Yellow-eyed Penguin Megadyptes antipodes. Ibis 132: 354365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1990.tb01055.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepsen, N, Schreck, C, Clements, S and Thorstad, E 2005 A brief discussion on the 2% tag/bodymass rule of thumb in aquatic telemetry: advances and applications. In: Spedicato, MT and Lembo, G (eds) Conference on Fish Telemetry in Europe pp 255259. FAO: Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Luna-Jorquera, G and Culik, B 2000 Metabolic rates of swim-ming Humboldt penguins. Marine Ecology Progress Series 203: 301309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps203301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, CR, Harcourt, R, Bateson, PP and Hindell, MA 2012 Animal welfare and decision making in wildlife research. Biological Conservation 153: 254256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Methling, C, Tudorache, C, Skov, PV and Steffensen, JF 2011 Pop up satellite tags impair swimming performance and energet-ics of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla). PLoS One 6(6): e20797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020797CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca de la República Argentina 2012 Informes de Coyuntura Noviembre y Diciembre 2012. http://www.minagri.gob.ar/site/pesca/pesca_mari-tima/04=informes/01-nformes_de_coyuntura/index.phpGoogle Scholar
Newton, I 2010 Population Ecology of Raptors. T & AD Poyser Ltd: Herts, UKGoogle Scholar
Pond, CM 1978 Morphological aspects and the ecological and mechanical consequences of fat deposition in wild vertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 9: 519570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.002511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, GH 1984 Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 15: 523575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropert-Coudert, Y, Wilson, RP, Daunt, F and Kato, A 2004 Patterns of energy acquisition by a central place forager: benefits of alternating short and long foraging trips. Behavioural Ecology 15:824830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, JE, Wilson, RP, Frere, E and Quintana, F 2012a Foraging effort in Magellanic penguins in coastal Patagonia, Argentina. Marine Ecology Progress Series 464: 273287. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps09887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, JE, Wilson, RP and Quintana, F 2012b How much is too much? Assessment of prey consumption by Magellanic penguins in Patagonian colonies. PLoS One 7(12): e51487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saraux, C, Bohec, C, Durant, JM, Viblanc, VA, Gauthier-Clerc, M, Beaune, D, Park, YH, Yoccoz, NG, Stenseth, NC and Le Maho, Y 2011 Reliability of flipper-banded penguins as indicators of climate change. Nature 469: 203206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scolaro, JA, Wilson, RP, Laurenti, S, Kierspel, M, Gallelli, H and Upton, J 1999 Feeding preferences of the Magellanic penguin over its breeding range in Argentina. Waterbirds 22: 104110. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1521999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simeone, A and Wilson, RP 2003 In-depth studies of Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) foraging: can we estimate prey consumption by perturbations in the dive profile? Marine Biology 143: 825831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-003-1114-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, DW, Brown, JS and Ydenberg, RC 2007 Foraging: Behavior and Ecology. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226772653.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, WJ 2006 Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: a review of the methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 599616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01182.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, A, Watanuki, Y, Sato, K, Kato, A, Arai, N, Nishikawa, J and Naito, Y 2003 Parental foraging effort and off-spring growth in Adélie Penguins: does working hard improve reproductive success? Functional Ecology 17: 590597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00772.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenabeele, SP, Shepard, EL, Grogan, A and Wilson, RP 2012 When three per cent may not be three per cent; device-equipped seabirds experience variable flight constraints. Marine Biology 159: 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1784-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weimerskirch, H, Gault, A and Cherel, Y 2005 Prey distribution and patchiness: factors in foraging success and efficiency of wandering albatrosses. Ecology 86: 26112622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, CR, Cassey, P, Schimpf, NG, Halsey, LG, Green, JA and Portugal, SJ 2013 Implantation reduces the negative effects of bio-logging devices on birds. Journal of Experimental Biology 216:537542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.076554Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, TD 1995 The Penguins: Spheniscidae. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Wilson, RP 1985 The jackass penguin (Spheniscus demersus) as a pelagic predator. Marine Ecology Progress Series 25: 219227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps025219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, RP 2011 The price tag. Nature 469: 164165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/469164aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, RP, Grant, WS and Duffy, DC 1986 Recording devices on free-ranging marine animals: does measurement affect foraging per-formance? Ecology 67: 10911093. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1939832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, RP, Kreye, JM, Lucke, K and Urquhart, H 2004 Antennae on transmitters on penguins: balancing energy budgets on the high wire. Journal of Experimental Biology 207: 26492662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, RP, Ryan, PG and Wilson, MP 1989 Sharing food in the stomachs of seabirds between adults and chicks: a case for delayed gastric emptying. Comparative Biochemistry and Phyiology A94: 461-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(89)90121-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, RP, Scolaro, A, Grémillet, D, Kierspel, MA, Laurenti, S, Upton, J, Gallelli, H, Quintana, F, Frere, E, Müller, G, Straten, MT and Zimmer, I 2005 How do Magellanic penguins cope with variability in their access to prey? Ecological Monographs 75: 379401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, RP, Shepard, ELC, Gómez Laich, A, Frere, E and Quintana, F 2010 Pedalling downhill and freewheeling up; a pen-guins perspective on foraging. Aquatic Biology 8: 193202. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ab00230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witter, MS and Cuthill, IC 1993 The ecological costs of avian fat storage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B340: 73-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1993.0050CrossRefGoogle Scholar