Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T18:29:42.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a Baseline Assessment of Organic Pig Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J E L Day*
Affiliation:
ADAS Pig Research Unit, ADAS Terrington, Terrington St Clement, Kings Lynn PE34 4PW, UK
H Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, King George VI Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
A Martins
Affiliation:
ADAS Pig Research Unit, ADAS Terrington, Terrington St Clement, Kings Lynn PE34 4PW, UK
S A Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, King George VI Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Jon.Day@provimi.com

Abstract

Organic farming is based on the premise that animal welfare is safeguarded primarily through good management; only when this fails are veterinary medicines used to intervene. As this premise is frequently quoted in marketing strategies, there is a need to assess the efficacy of this approach to reassure consumers. To move towards this assessment, a survey was conducted between August 1999 and April 2002 on nine organic pig farms located predominantly in the South West of England. This combined direct measurements of animals and facilities with structured questions to staff. The mean herd size (± standard error of mean) was 212 ± 74 sows, with all progeny being reared outdoors from farrowing to finish. The herds had been in existence for an average of 37 ± 7.0 months. Mange and lice were the highest-ranking current health concerns, and post-mortem report of endoparasitism was the highest-ranking historical health concern chosen by producers from a list pre-written by the experimenters. The main welfare issues reported by the primary stockperson were related to keeping stock clean and dry during periods of high rainfall, managing porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS) and postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) within their herd, and recruiting and retaining good quality personnel. Facility assessment indicated good living conditions, with the exception of some wet paddocks during winter. Sow condition scores were not significantly different from accepted target values during pregnancy, at farrowing, or at weaning. Levels of lameness, skin damage and cleanliness did not cause concern in any class of stock.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beharrel, B and MacFie, J H 1991 Consumer attitudes to organic foods. British Food Journal 93(2): 2530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambell, F W R 1965 Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of livestock kept under intensive husbandry systems. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Burfoot, A, Kay, R M and Corning, S 1995 A scoring method to assess damage caused by aggression between sows after mixing. Animal Science 60: 564 (Abstr)Google Scholar
MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food) 1998 Condition scoring of pigs. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Vermeer, H M, Altena, H, Bestman, M, Ellinger, L, Cranen, I, Spoolder, H A M and Baars, T 2001 Organic pig farms in the Netherlands. In: Hovi M and Bouilhol M (eds) Human-Animal Relationship: Stockmanship and Housing in Organic Livestock Systems. Proceedings of the 3rd NAHWOA Workshop (Network for Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture), Clermont Ferrand, France p 138. Reading University: Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Knierim, U and Winckler, C 2001 Assessment of animal welfare on organic farms. In: Hovi M and Bouilhol M (eds) Human-Animal Relationship: Stockmanship and Housing in Organic Livestock Systems. Proceedings of the 3rd NAHWOA Workshop (Network for Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture), Clermont Ferrand, France p 137. Reading University: Reading, UKGoogle Scholar