Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T20:35:25.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Travel Sickness and Meat Quality in Pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

R H Bradshaw ,
J M Randall ,
M L Forsling ,
R Rodway ,
J A Goode ,
S N Brown  and
D M Broom
R H Bradshaw*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OES, UK
J M Randall
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS, UK
M L Forsling
Affiliation:
UMDS, Division of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, St Thomas's Hospital, London SEI 7EM, UK
R Rodway
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
J A Goode
Affiliation:
MAFF Laboratory of Welfare and Behaviour, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4ET, UK
S N Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS 18 7DY, UK
D M Broom
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OES, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints Final Acceptance: 18 June 1998
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the incidence of travel sickness in pigs, specific hormone concentrations at exsanguination and subsequent meat quality. Fifty, 80kg slaughter pigs were transported on a lorry for 4.5h. During the journey, behavioural observations of the individually marked pigs were made by scanning every 8min to establish whether the pigs exhibited certain symptoms of travel sickness (foaming at the mouth and chomping) and incidences of retching and vomiting were noted as they occurred. Upon arrival at the slaughterhouse, pigs were unloaded, slaughtered immediately and a blood sample was taken at exsanguination for analysis of plasma Cortisol, beta-endorphin and lysine vasopressin concentrations. On the day following slaughter, the chilled carcase of each pig was assessed for meat quality (using pH, Fibre Optic Probe, and Tecpro Pork Quality Meter measurements) in the longissimus dorsi, semimembranosus and adductor muscles to determine the incidence of PSE (pale, soft, exudative) or DFD (dark, firm, dry) meat quality. Twenty-six per cent of the pigs (a total of 13 individuals) vomited or retched during the journey. There was no relationship between the incidence of travel sickness and either the concentrations of the hormones analysed at exsanguination or subsequent meat quality. Correlations revealed no significant relationship between concentrations of the hormones and meat quality measurements.

Keywords

animal welfarelysine vasopressinmeat qualitypigsstress hormonestravel sickness
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 3 - 14
Copyright
© 1999 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton-Gade, P, Christensen, L, Brown, S N, and Warriss, P D 1996a Effect of tier and ventilation during transport on blood parameters and meat quality in slaughter pigs. In: Schütte, A (ed) New Information on Welfare and Meat Quality of Pigs as Related to Handling, Transport and Lairage Conditions pp 101–116. Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL): Braunschweig-Volkenrode, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Barton-Gade, P, Warriss, P D, Brown, S N and Lambooij, B 1996b Methods of improving pig welfare and meat quality by reducing stress and discomfort before slaughter - methods of assessing meat quality. In: Schütte, A (ed) New Information on Welfare and Meat Quality of Pigs as Related to Handling, Transport and Lairage Conditions pp 23–34. Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL): Braunschweig-Volkenrode, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, R H and Hall, S J G 1996 Incidence of travel sickness in pigs. Veterinary Record 139: 503Google ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, R H, Hall, S J G and Broom, D M 1995 Behavioural and Cortisol response of pigs and sheep during transport. Veterinary Record 138: 233–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, R H, Parrott, R F, Forsling, M L, Goode, J A, Lloyd, D M, Rodway, R and Broom, D M 1996b Stress and travel sickness in pigs: effects of road journeys on concentrations of plasma Cortisol, beta-endorphin and lysine vasopressin. Animal Science 63: 507–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, R H, Parrott, R F, Goode, J A, Lloyd, D M, Rodway, R and Broom, D M 1996a Behavioural and hormonal responses of pigs during transport: effect of mixing and duration of journey. Animal Science 62: 547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S N, Knowles, T G, McKinstry, J L, Edwards, J E, Anil, M H and Warriss, P D 1993 Patterns of response of some physiological indices of stress in pigs negotiating loading ramps. Animal Production 56: 439(Abstract)Google Scholar
Dalin, A M, Magnusson, U, Haggendal, J and Nyberg, L 1993 The effects of transport stress on plasma levels of catecholamines, Cortisol, corticosteroid-binding globulin, blood cell count and lymphocyte proliferation in pigs. Acta Veterinaria Scandanavia 34: 59–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebenezer, I S, Thornton, S N and Parrott, R F 1989 Anterior and posterior pituitary hormone release induced in sheep by cholecystokinin. American Journal of Physiology 256: R1355–R1357Google ScholarPubMed
Fordham, D P, Lincoln, G A, Ssewannyana, E and Rodway, R G 1989 Plasma beta-endorphin and Cortisol concentrations in lambs after handling, transport and slaughter. Animal Production 49: 103–107Google Scholar
Forsling, M L, Sharman, D F, and Stephens, D B 1984 Vasopressin in the blood plasma of pigs and calves exposed to noise and vibration comparable with that experienced during transport. Journal of Physiology 357: 96Google Scholar
Geers, R 1995 A modulating effect of beta-endorphin on pigs’ coping strategies during transport. Physiology & Behavior 57: 1057–1060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geers, R, Bleus, E, Van Schie, T, Ville, H, Gerard, H, Janssens, S, Nackaerts, G, Decuypere, E and Jourquin, J 1994 Transport of pigs different with respect to the halothane gene: stress assessment. Journal of Animal Science 72: 2552–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guise, H J and Penny, R H 1989a Factors influencing the welfare and carcass and meat quality of pigs: 1. The effects of stocking density in transport and the use of electric goads. Animal Production 49: 511–515Google Scholar
Guise, H J and Penny, R H C 1989b Factors influencing the welfare and carcass and meat quality of pigs: 2. Mixing unfamiliar pigs. Animal Production 49: 517–521Google Scholar
Lambooy, E and Engel, B 1991 Transport of slaughter pigs by truck over a long distance: some aspects of loading density and ventilation. Livestock Production Science 28: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, A S, Sierverty, C E, Morley, J E, Gosnell, B A and Silvis, S E 1984 Peptidergic regulation of feeding in the dog (Canis familiaris). Peptides 5: 675–679CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDougall, D B 1984 Meat Research Institute light probe for stressed meat detection. Analytical Proceedings 21: 494–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miaskiewicz, S L, Strieker, E M and Verbalis, J G 1989 Neurohypophysial secretion in response to cholecystokinin but not meal-induced gastric distension in humans. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 68: 837–843CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanni-Costa, L, Lo Fiego, D P, De Grossi, A and Russo, V 1996 Effect of loading method, stocking density and temperature on carcass and meat quality in heavy pigs. In: Schütte, A (ed) New Information on Welfare and Meat Quality of Pigs as Related to Handling, Transport and Lairage Conditions pp 83–93. Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL): Braunschweig-Volkenrode, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Parrott, R F, Ebenezer, I S, Forsling, M L and Baldwin, BA 1991 The effect of intravenous cholecystokinin on vasopressin and Cortisol release in the conscious pig. British Journal of Pharmacology 102 (Supplement): 47PGoogle Scholar
Parrott, R F and Goode, J A 1992 Effects of intracerebroventricular corticotropin-releasing hormone and intravenous morphine on Cortisol, prolactin and growth hormone secretion in sheep. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 9: 141–149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, J M 1993 Environmental parameters necessary to define comfort for pigs, cattle and sheep in livestock transport. Animal Production 57: 299–307Google Scholar
Randall, J M and Bradshaw, R H 1998 Vehicle motion and motion sickness in pigs. Animal Science 66: 239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riches, H, Guise, J and Penny, R 1996 Preliminary investigation of frequency of vomiting by pigs in transport. Veterinary Record 139: 428Google ScholarPubMed
Santos, C, Almeida, J M, Matias, E C, Fraqueza, M J, Roseiro, C and Sardinha, L 1996 Influence of lairage environmental conditions and resting time on meat quality in pigs. In: Schütte, A (ed) New Information on Welfare and Meat Quality of Pigs as Related to Handling, Transport and Lairage Conditions pp 171–180. Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL): Braunschweig-Volkenrode, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Schütte, A, Mergens, A, Pott, U and Venthien, S 1996 Effect of transport conditions (straw; stoppage) and unloading procedures on physiological and meat quality parameters. In: Schütte, A (ed) New Information on Welfare and Meat Quality of Pigs as Related to Handling, Transport and Lairage Conditions pp 117–128. Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL): Braunschweig-Volkenrode, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Thornton, S N, Forsling, M L, Baldwin, B A and Delaney, C E 1987 Separate mechanisms for central osmotically-induced drinking and vasopressin release in mini-pigs. Physiology & Behavior 39: 541 - 545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbalis, J G, Richardson, D W and Strieker, E M 1987 Vasopressin release in response to nausea-producing agents and cholecystokinin in monkeys. American Journal of Physiology 252: R749–R753Google ScholarPubMed
Warriss, P D, Bevis, E A, Edwards, J E, Brown, S N and Knowles, T G 1991 Use of the Tecpro Pork Quality Meter for assessing meat quality on the slaughterline. Meat Science 30: 147–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, P D, Bevis, E A and Ekins, P J 1989b The relationship between glycogen and muscle ultimate pH in commercially slaughtered pigs. British Veterinary Journal 145: 378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, P D and Brown, S N 1985 The physiological responses to fighting in pigs and the consequences for meat quality. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture 36: 87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, P D, Brown, S N, Adams, S J M and Corlett, I K 1994 Relationships between subjective and objective assessments of stress at slaughter and meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 38: 329–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, P D, Brown, S N, Lopez-Bote, C, Bevis, E A and Adams, S J M 1989a Evaluation of lean meat quality in pigs using two electronic probes. Meat Science 25: 281–291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, P D, Brown, S N, Nute, G R, Knowles, T G, Edwards, J E, Perry, A M and Johnson, S P 1995 Potential interactions between the effects of preslaughter stress and post-mortem electrical stimulation of the carcasses on meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 41: 55–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed