Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T17:21:26.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of the maintenance energy requirements, methane emissions and nitrogen utilization efficiency of two suckler cow genotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2015

C. X. Zou ,
F. O. Lively ,
A. R. G. Wylie  and
T. Yan
C. X. Zou
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK Buffalo Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi 530001, China
F. O. Lively
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
A. R. G. Wylie
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
T. Yan*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
*
†E-mail: tianhai.yan@afbini.gov.uk
Get access

Abstract

Seventeen non-lactating dairy-bred suckler cows (LF; Limousin×Holstein-Friesian) and 17 non-lactating beef composite breed suckler cows (ST; Stabiliser) were used to study enteric methane emissions and energy and nitrogen (N) utilization from grass silage diets. Cows were housed in cubicle accommodation for 17 days, and then moved to individual tie-stalls for an 8-day digestibility balance including a 2-day adaption followed by immediate transfer to an indirect, open-circuit, respiration calorimeters for 3 days with gaseous exchange recorded over the last two of these days. Grass silage was offered ad libitum once daily at 0900 h throughout the study. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) between the genotypes for energy intakes, energy outputs or energy use efficiency, or for methane emission rates (methane emissions per unit of dry matter intake or energy intake), or for N metabolism characteristics (N intake or N output in faeces or urine). Accordingly, the data for both cow genotypes were pooled and used to develop relationships between inputs and outputs. Regression of energy retention against ME intake (r2=0.52; P<0.001) indicated values for net energy requirements for maintenance of 0.386, 0.392 and 0.375 MJ/kg0.75 for LF+ST, LF and ST respectively. Methane energy output was 0.066 of gross energy intake when the intercept was omitted from the linear equation (r2=0.59; P<0.001). There were positive linear relationships between N intake and N outputs in manure, and manure N accounted for 0.923 of the N intake. The present results provide approaches to predict maintenance energy requirement, methane emission and manure N output for suckler cows and further information is required to evaluate their application in a wide range of suckler production systems.

Keywords

energy metabolismenteric methane emissionsnitrogen outputgrass silagesuckler cow
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , April 2016 , pp. 616 - 622
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, RE and Yan, T 2000. Impact of recent research on energy feeding systems for dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 66, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council (AFRC) 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E 1965. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. Pages 411 in Energy metabolism. EAAP Pub. No. 11. European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), Troon, UK.Google Scholar
Bruinenberg, MH, Van Der Honing, Y, Agnew, RE, Yan, T, Van Vuuren, AM and Valk, H 2002. Energy metabolism of dairy cows fed on grass. Livestock Production Science 75, 117–128.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, SA and Ørskov, ER 1994. Implications of fasting on the energy metabolism and feed evaluation in ruminants. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 3, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushnahan, A and Gordon, FJ 1995. The effects of grass preservation on intake, apparent digestibility and rumen degradation characteristics. Animal Science 60, 429–438.Google Scholar
Ellis, JL, Kebreab, E, Odongo, NE, McBride, BW, Okine, EK and France, J 2007. Prediction of methane emission from dairy and beef cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3456–3467.Google Scholar
Gordon, FJ, Porter, MG, Mayne, CS, Unsworth, EF and Kilpatrick, DJ 1995. The effect of forage digestibility and type of concentrate on nutrient utilisation for lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 62, 15–27.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2006. 2006 Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan. Retrieved January 20, 2008, from http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4_10Ch10_Livestock.pdf Google Scholar
Kebreab, E, France, J, Agnew, RE, Yan, T, Dhanoa, MS, Dijkstra, J, Beever, DE and Reynolds, CK 2003. Alternative to linear analysis of retained energy data from lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2904–2913.Google Scholar
Kebreab, E, France, J, Beever, DE and Castillo, AR 2001. Nitrogen pollution by dairy cows and its mitigation by dietary manipulation. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 60, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebreab, E, Johnson, KA, Archibeque, SL, Pape, D and Wirth, T 2008. Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2738–2748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, JAN, Crompton, LA, Bannink, A, Tamminga, S, Moorby, JM and Reynolds, CK 2009. Predicting methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from cattle. In: Crompton LA and Wheeler TR (editors), Proceedings of the forty-first meeting of the agricultural research modellers’ group, The Journal of Agricultural Science 147, 741.Google Scholar
Mills, JAN, Kebreab, E, Yates, CM, Crompton, LA, Cammell, SB, Dhanoa, MS, Agnew, RE and France, J 2003. Alternative approaches to predicting methane emissions from dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3141–3150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moe, PW and Tyrrell, HF 1979. Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 1583–1586.Google Scholar
Mulvany, PM 1977. Dairy cows condition scoring. Paper No. 4468. National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) 1989. Ruminant Nutrition. Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables. R. Jarrige, edited. INRA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1996. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Porter, MG 1992. Comparison of sample preparation methods for the determination of the gross energy concentration of fresh silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37, 201–208.Google Scholar
Porter, MG and Murray, RS 2001. The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and the inter-relationship between dry matter content estimated by different analytical methods. Grass Forages Science 56, 405–411.Google Scholar
Reynolds, CK, Tyrell, HF and Reynolds, PJ 1991. Effects of diet forage-to-concentrate ratio and intake on energy metabolism in growing beef heifers: whole body energy and nitrogen balance and visceral heat production. Journal of Nutrition 121, 994–1003.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ 1989. A comparison of soyabean, sunflower, and fish meals as protein supplements for yearling cattle offered grass silage based diets. Animal Production 48, 127–132.Google Scholar
Webster, J 2011. Management and Welfare of Farm Animal: The UFAW Farm Handbook, 5th edition. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from https://books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=1405181745 Google Scholar
Yan, T, Agnew, RE, Gordon, FJ and Porter, MG 2000. Prediction of methane energy output in dairy and beef cattle offered grass silage-based diets. Livestock Production Science 64, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, T, Frost, JP, Agnew, RE, Binnie, RC and Mayne, CS 2006. Relationships among manure nitrogen output and dietary and animal factors in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3981–3991.Google Scholar
Yan, T, Frost, JP, Keady, TWJ, Agnew, RE and Mayne, CS 2007. Prediction of nitrogen excretion in faeces and urine of beef cattle offered diets containing grass silage. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1982–1989.Google Scholar
Yan, T, Gordon, FJ, Agnew, RE, Porter, MG and Patterson, DC 1997a. The metabolizable energy requirement for maintenance and the efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy for lactation by dairy cows offered grass silage based diets. Livestock Production Science 51, 141–150.Google Scholar
Yan, T, Gordon, FJ, Ferris, CP, Agnew, RE, Porter, MG and Patterson, DC 1997b. The fasting heat production and effect of lactation on energy utilization by dairy cows offered forage-based diets. Livestock Production Science 52, 177–186.Google Scholar