Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T02:56:06.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding beef-cattle farming management strategies by identifying motivations behind farmers’ priorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2011

M. A. Magne ,
M. Cerf  and
S. Ingrand
M. A. Magne*
Affiliation:
INRA – UMR1273 Métafort, Equipe Select, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France
M. Cerf
Affiliation:
INRA – UR SenS 1326, F-78850 Thivernal-Grignon, France
S. Ingrand
Affiliation:
INRA – UMR1273 Métafort, Equipe Select, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France
Get access

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and better understand management strategies that help livestock farmers adapt to changes in their production contexts, a fundamental challenge. A total of nine beef-cattle farmers were interviewed three times over 1 year to discuss 13 dimensions of livestock farming (e.g. reproduction, feeding, sales, etc.). Characterisation of management strategies rested on three main factors: (i) ranking of the dimensions according to the degree to which farmers desired to control them, (ii) reasons for the ranking and (iii) management guidelines. Although farmers agreed upon the rank of certain dimensions, such as herd management, they differed on that of others, such as sales and administration/regulations. Four motivation categories were identified: risk, pleasure, efficiency and ability to control the dimension. Three management guidelines were identified, which indicated that farmers managed for future survival of their farms at different scales (animal/herd v. whole-farm), involving different resources (biological v. financial) and based on different animal categories (reproductive cows v. animals sold). These results improve understanding of individual livestock farmers and their current management strategies by integrating the motivations behind their strategies. For this reason, they constitute methodological elements that agricultural advisors can use to provide relevant information to farmers while accommodating differences in farm management.

Keywords

management strategieslivestock farming systemagricultural advicefarmer motivationfarmer priorities
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 6 , June 2012 , pp. 971 - 979
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanc, F, Bocquier, F, Agabriel, J, D'hour, P, Chilliard, Y 2006. Adaptive abilities of the females and sustainability of ruminant livestock systems. A review. Animal Research 55, 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodt, S, Klonsky, K, Tourte, L 2006. Farmer goals and management styles: implications for advancing biologically based agriculture. Agricultural Systems 89, 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerf, M, Magne, MA 2007. How do farmers make use of developmental intervention? @ctivités 4, 123–132.Google Scholar
Dedieu, B, Ingrand, S 2010. Incertitude et adaptation: cadres théoriques et application à l'analyse de la dynamique des systèmes d’élevage. INRA Productions Animales 23, 81–90.Google Scholar
Fiorelli, C, Dedieu, B, Pailleux, JY 2007. Explaining diversity of livestock-farming management strategies of multiple-job holders: importance of level of production objectives and role of farming in the household. Animal 1, 1209–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibon, A, Hermansen, JE 2006. Sustainability concept in livestock farming system research orientations. EAAP 2006, Antalya, Turkey – Session 1, Ethics of sustainability, 12p. Retrieved December 6, 2007, from http://www.eaap.org/Previous_Annual_Meetings/2006Antalya/sessions/session_01.htm.Google Scholar
Gibon, A, Rubino, R, Sibbald, AR, Sorensen, JT, Flamant, JC, Lhoste, P, Revilla, R 1996. A review of current approaches to livestock farming systems in Europe: towards a common understanding. Proceedings of Livestock Farming Systems: Research, Development Socio-economics and the Land Manager, Aberdeen, Scotland, pp. 7–19.Google Scholar
Girard, N, Bellon, S, Hubert, B, Lardon, S, Moulin, CH, Osty, PL 2001. Categorising combinations of farmers’ land use practices: an approach based on examples of sheep farms in the South of France. Agronomie 21, 435–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, H 2007. Strategy factors as drivers and restraints on dairy farm performance: evidence from Sweden. Agricultural Systems 94, 726–737.Google Scholar
Hubert, B, Girard, N, Lasseur, J, Bellon, S 1993. Les systèmes d’élevage ovin préalpins: derrière les pratiques, des conceptions modélisables. Etudes et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement 27, 351–387.Google Scholar
Ingrand, S, Pailleux, JY, Poupart, S 2009. Analyse de la hiérarchisation des domaines d’élevage par les éleveurs de bovins et ovins allaitants. 16e Journées de Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, p. 395.Google Scholar
Ingrand, S, Pailleux, JY, Poupart, S, Magne, MA, Mugnier, S 2010. Analysis of stockbreeder hierarchies within the livestock farming domains (cattle and sheep). Book of Abstracts of the 61st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, vol. 16, p. 246. Wageningen Academic Publishers, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Johnson, G, Scholes, K, Whittington, R, Fréry, F 2008. Stratégique, 8th edition. Pearson Education, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Keating, BA, McCown, RL 2011. Advances in farming systems analysis and intervention. Agricultural Systems 70, 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magne, MA, Ingrand, S 2004. Advising beef cattle farmers: problem finding rather than problem solving. Characterization of advice practices in Creuse. Journal of Agriculture, Education and Extension 10, 171–179.Google Scholar
Magne, MA, Cerf, M 2009. How information becomes a resource to act in an uncertain and complex world: sense making and contingency in the knowing process. Outlook on Agriculture 38, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magne, MA, Cerf, M, Ingrand, S 2010. A conceptual model of farmers’ informational activity: a tool for improved support of livestock farming management. Animal 4, 842–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rougoor, CW, Trip, G, Huirne, RBB, Renkema, JA 1998. How to define and study farmers’ management capacity: theory and use in agricultural economics. Agricultural Economics 18, 261–272.Google Scholar
Solano, C, León, H, Pérez, E, Tole, L, Fawcett, RH, Herrero, M 2006. Using farmer decision-making profiles and managerial capacity as predictors of farm management and performance in Costa Rican dairy farms. Agricultural Systems 88, 395–428.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, JD 1993. Rural sociology and the new agrarian question. Sociologia Ruralis 33, 240–260.Google Scholar
Veysset, P, Lherm, M, Bebin, D 2005. Evolutions, dispersions et déterminants du revenu en élevage bovin allaitant charolais. Etude sur 15 ans (1989–2003) à partir d'un échantillon constant de 69 exploitations. INRA Productions Animales 18, 265–275.Google Scholar