Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T02:05:15.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Portfolio management for insurers and pension funds and COVID-19: targeting volatility for equity, balanced, and target-date funds with leverage constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2023

Bao Doan
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, RMIT University Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Jonathan J. Reeves
Affiliation:
School of Banking and Finance, UNSW Business School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Michael Sherris*
Affiliation:
School of Risk & Actuarial Studies, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Michael Sherris; Email: m.sherris@unsw.edu.au

Abstract

Insurers and pension funds face the challenges of historically low-interest rates and high volatility in equity markets, that have been accentuated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent advances in equity portfolio management with a target volatility have been shown to deliver improved on average risk-adjusted return, after transaction costs. This paper studies these targeted volatility portfolios in applications to equity, balanced, and target-date funds with varying constraints on leverage. Conservative leverage constraints are particularly relevant to pension funds and insurance companies, with more aggressive leverage levels appropriate for alternative investments. We show substantial improvements in fund performance for differing leverage levels, and of most interest to insurers and pension funds, we show that the highest Sharpe ratios and smallest drawdowns are in targeted volatility-balanced portfolios with equity and bond allocations. Furthermore, we demonstrate the outperformance of targeted volatility portfolios during major stock market crashes, including the crash from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Type
Original Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bekaert, G. & Wu, G. (2000). Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 13(1), 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollerslev, T., Litvinova, J. & Tauchen, G. (2006). Leverage and volatility feedback effects in high-frequency data. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4(3), 353384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.Y. & Hentschel, L. (1992). No news is good news: an asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 31(3), 281318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnero, M.A., Pena, D. & Ruiz, E. (2006). Estimating GARCH volatility in the presence of outliers. Economics Letters, 114(1), 8690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, A. & Silvennoinen, A. (2013). Volatility timing: how best to forecast portfolio exposures. Journal of Empirical Finance, 24, 108115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doan, B., Papageorgiou, N., Reeves, J.J. & Sherris, M. (2018). Portfolio management with targeted constant market volatility. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 83, 134147.Google Scholar
Fleming, J., Kirby, C. & Ostdiek, B. (2001). The economic value of volatility timing. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), 329352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, J., Kirby, C. & Ostdiek, B. (2003). The economic value of volatility timing using “Realized” volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(3), 473509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, A.W. & Reeves, J. (2010). Estimation and inference in ARCH models in the presence of outliers. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 8(4), 547569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Y. (2006). Asset allocation with a high dimensional latent factor stochastic volatility model. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(1), 237271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A.C. (2013). Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails: With Applications to Financial and Economic Time Series (Econometric Society Monographs). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocquard, A., Ng, S. & Papageorgiou, N. (2013). A constant-volatility framework for managing tail risk. Journal of Portfolio Management, 39(2), 2840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, C. & Ostdiek, B. (2012). It’s all in the timing: simple active portfolio strategies that outperform Naive diversification. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47(2), 437467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Labit Hardy, H., Sherris, M. & Villegas, A.M. (2022). A managed volatility investment strategy for pooled annuity products. Risks, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q. (2009). On portfolio optimization: how and when do we benefit from high-frequency data? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(4), 560582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, A. & Muir, T. (2017). Volatility-managed portfolios. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 16111644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivieri, A., Thirurajah, S. & Ziveyi, J. (2022). Target volatility strategies for group self-annuity portfolios. Astin Bulletin, 52(2), 591617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, J.M. & Summers, L.H. (1986). The persistence of volatility and stock market fluctuations. The American Economic Review, 76, 11421151.Google Scholar
Wu, G. (2001). The determinants of asymmetric volatility. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 837859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar