Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T14:12:40.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Body of knowledge/Knowledge of body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Margaret W. Conkey*
Affiliation:
Archaeological Research Facility and Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720-3710, USA. E-mail: conkey@qal.berkeley.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bynum, C. 1995. Why all the fuss about the body? A medievalist's perspective, Critical Inquiry 22: 133.Google Scholar
Delporte, H. 1990. L'image des animaux dans l'art préhistorique. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Kellere, F. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Laqueur, T. 1990. Making sex: body andgenderfrom the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mack, R. 1996. Ordering the body and embodying order: the kouros in Archaic Greek society. Ph.D dissertation, Department of History of Art, University of California, Berkeley (CA).Google Scholar
Merchant, C. 1980. The death of nature: women, ecologyand the scientific revolution. New York (NY): Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Moore, H. 1994. The feminist anthropologist and the passion(s) of New Eve, in Moore, H., A passion for difference: 128–50. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1980. No nature, no culture: the Hagen case, in MacCormack, C. & Strathern, M. (ed.], Nature, culture, gender: 174222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar