Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T11:23:33.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of language production mechanisms in children's sentence repetition: Evidence from an inflectionally rich language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

SONALI NAG*
Affiliation:
Promise Foundation and University of Oxford
MARGARET J. SNOWLING
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
JELENA MIRKOVIĆ*
Affiliation:
York St. John University and University of York
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Sonali Nag, Promise Foundation, 231, C. H. Layout, B. Hosahalli Road, Sarjapura, Bangalore 562125, India. E-mail: sonalinag@t-p-f.org
Jelena Mirkovic, School of Psychology and Social Sciences, York St. John University, Lord Mayor's Walk, York YO31 7EX, UK. E-mail: j.mirkovic@yorksj.ac.uk

Abstract

We examine the role of language production mechanisms in sentence repetition, a task widely used as a diagnostic tool in developmental disorders. We investigate sentence repetition in 5- to 8-year-old native speakers of Kannada, an inflectionally rich language of India. The inflectional characteristics of the language make it an ideal testing ground for exploring the engagement of grammatical and phonological encoding processes. We presented active, passive, and embedded sentences and, in a subset of the material, we also manipulated sentence length. Using accuracy and speech error analyses at the sentence, word, and affix levels, we provide evidence that individual differences in task performance are influenced by the linguistic properties of the material. These findings clarify the role of key language production mechanisms involved in sentence repetition. We propose that it is the versatility to develop a profile across several language production mechanisms that makes sentence repetition particularly useful as a clinical tool.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009a). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 5068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009b). Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations of the relationship between language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 329350.Google Scholar
Amritavalli, R. (2008). The origins of functional and lexical categories: Tense-aspect and adjectives in Dravidian. Nanzan Linguistics, 4, 120.Google Scholar
Archibald, L. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Short-term and working memory in specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 675693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archibald, L. M. D., & Joanisse, M. F. (2009). On the sensitivity and specificity of nonword repetition and sentence recall to language and memory impairments in children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 52, 899914.Google Scholar
Bock, K. (1996). Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 3, 395421.Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945984). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 4593.Google Scholar
Botting, N. F., & Conti-Ramsden, G. M. (2003). Autism, primary pragmatic difficulties, and specific language impairment: Can we distinguish them using psycholinguistic markers? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 45, 515524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coady, J. A., & Evans, J. L. (2008). Uses and interpretations of nonword repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 140.Google Scholar
Chiat, S., Armon-Lotem, S., Marinis, T., Polišenská, K., Roy, P., & Seeff-Gabriel, B. (2013). The assessment of language abilities in sequential bilingual children: The potential of sentence imitation tasks. In Gathercole, V. C. M. (Ed.), Issues in the assessment of bilinguals (pp. 5686). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 741748.Google Scholar
Delcenserie, A., Genesee, F., & Gauthier, K. (2012). Language abilities of internationally adopted children from China during the early school years: Evidence for early age effects? Applied Psycholinguistics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000865 Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42, 287314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, K., Moloi, F., & Machobane, M. (2010). 3-Year-olds’ comprehension, production, and generalization of Sesotho passives. Cognition, 115, 238251.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., & Caselli, C. M. (2007). Sentence repetition as a measure of early grammatical development in Italian. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42, 187208.Google Scholar
Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 11361146.Google Scholar
Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112, 531.Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., & Firato, C. E. (2002). Proactive interference effects in sentence production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 795800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gábor, B., & Lukács, A. (2012). Early morphological productivity in Hungarian: Evidence from sentence repetition and elicited production. Journal of Child Language, 39, 411442.Google Scholar
Gauthier, K., & Genesee, F. (2011). Language development in internationally-adopted children: A special case of early second language learning. Child Development, 82, 115.Google Scholar
Gennari, S. P., Mirković, J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2012). Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 141176.Google Scholar
Goldrick, M., Baker, H. R., Murphy, A., & Baese-Berk, M. (2011). Interaction and representational integration: Evidence from speech errors. Cognition, 121, 5872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, P., & Chafetz, J. (1990). Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of passives. Cognition, 36, 227254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heisler, L., Goffman, L., & Younger, B. (2010). Lexical and articulatory interactions in children's language production. Developmental Science, 13, 722730.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., Lervåg, A., & Snowling, M. J. (2015). The foundations of literacy development in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 26, 18771886.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Norcliffe, E. (2009). The cross-linguistic study of sentence production: State of the art and a call for action. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3, 866887.Google Scholar
Klem, M., Melby-Lervåg, M., Hagtvet, B., Lyster, S.-A. H., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Hulme, C. (2014). Sentence repetition is a measure of children's language skills rather than working memory limitations. Developmental Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/desc.12202 Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (2014). Specific language impairment across languages. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 15.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 138.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 226.Google Scholar
Melinger, A. (2003). Morphological structure in the lexical representation of prefixed words: Evidence from speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 335362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirković, J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2013). When singular and plural are both grammatical: Semantic and morphophonological effects in agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 277298.Google Scholar
Moll, K., Hulme, C., Nag, S., & Snowling, M. J. (2013). Sentence repetition as a marker of language skills in children with dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 119. doi:10.1017/S0142716413000209 Google Scholar
Nag, S. (2008). Chili pili padabhandara [Chili Pili Vocabulary Test]. Bangalore, India: Promise Foundation.Google Scholar
Nag, S. (2012). Kannada Age of Acquisition Corpus. Bangalore, India: Promise Foundation.Google Scholar
Nag, S., & Snowling, M. (2011). Cognitive profiles of poor readers of Kannada. Reading and Writing, 24, 657676.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2010). The interface between bilingual development and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 227252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polišenská, K., Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2015). Sentence repetition: What does the task measure? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50, 106118.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1990). Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 633654.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1995). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales: Section 2. The Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Redmond, S. M., Thompson, H. L., & Goldstein, S. (2011). Psycholinguistic profiling differentiates specific language impairment from typical development and from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 54, 99117.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Warren, S. F., & Betz, S. K. (2005). Language symptoms of developmental language disorders: An overview of autism, Downs syndrome, fragile X, specific language impairment, and Williams syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riches, N. G. (2012). Sentence repetition in children with specific language impairment: An investigation of underlying mechanisms. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 499510.Google Scholar
Sengottuvel, K., & Rao, P. K. S. (2013). Aspects of grammar sensitive to procedural memory deficits in children with specific language impairment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 33173331.Google Scholar
Sridhar, S. N. (1990). Kannada: Descriptive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. F., Wong, A., Fletcher, P., & Leonard, L. B. (2006). Nonword repetition and sentence repetition as clinical markers of specific language impairment: The case of Cantonese. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 219236.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442.Google Scholar
Wilsenach, C. (2006). Syntactic processing in developmental dyslexia and in specific language impairment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nag supplementary material

Table S1

Download Nag supplementary material(File)
File 15.9 KB