Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T09:44:47.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on some compound poisson distributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Carl Philipson*
Affiliation:
Stockholm
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At the Lundberg Symposium, Stockholm 1968 Jung and Lundberg presented a report on similar problems as those treated in this note, and to the Astin colloquium, Berlin 1968 the present author presented a report with the same title as this note, where some of the results in the first-mentioned report were commented upon. Jung and Lundberg kindly discussed the topic here concerned with the present author some time after the colloquium. On account of this discussion, the present author withdrew his report from the publication in its original form. The following context is a revision and a completion of the author's report to the colloquium.

Let τ be a parameter measured on its original, absolute scale, and let be the same parameter measured on an operational scale with respect to the probability distribution (or the corresponding for t). The parameter will often be referred to as “time”, which does not imply a restriction of the theory to proper time parameters.

A random function X(s) is said to be distributed in a cPd i.w.s. (compound Poisson distribution in the wide sense), if the distribution function of X(s) for every fixed parameter point (s, τ) in a finite or infinite domaine of the parametric space as a function of τ can be written in the following general form

where the asterisk power m*, here and throughout this note, is taken to mean, for m ˃ O, the m times iterated convolution of the distribution function with itself, and, for m = o, unity. W(x, s) being the conditional distribution function of the size of one change in X(s) relative to the hypothesis that the change has occurred at s, here abbreviated to the change distribution. U(ν, τ) is a distribution function, called the structure function. In the general case V(x, s) and U(ν, τ) may depend on s and τ respectively. If, particularly, these functions are supposed to be independent of the parameter, they will be denoted V(x), U(ν) respectively. In the particular case, where V(x) = ε(ν—c1), c1 being an arbitrary but fixed constant and ε(ξ), here, and in the following context, the unity distribution equal to zero for negative values, and to unity for non-negative values of ξ, the cPd is said to be elementary and, in the opposite case, non-elementary. In the elementary case the distribution of X(s) is defined by the integral appearing in (Ia) with x = c1, so that W(x, s) = W(x) = I.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1971

References

Literature Cited

[1]Thyrion, P., “Note sur une transformation des distributions généralisées”, Bull. Ass. Roy. Act. Belg., 1963.Google Scholar
[2]Rényi, A., et al, “On composed Poisson distributions I-II”, Ada Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1-3, 19511952.Google Scholar
[3]Lundberg, O., On Random Processes and Their Application to Sickness and Accident Statistics, Uppsala, 1940, and (2nd ed.) 1964.Google Scholar
[4]Jung, J. and Lundberg, O., “Problems connected with compound Poisson processes”, The Lundberg Symposium, Stockholm, 1968.Google Scholar
[5]Bühlmann, H., “Kollektive Risikotheorien”, Bull, des actuaires suisses, 65, 1965.Google Scholar
[6]Cramér, H., “Collective risk theory, a survey from the point of view of the theory of stochastic processes”, Skandia Jubilee Volume, 1955.Google Scholar
[7]Philipson, C. , “A method of estimating grouped frequencies”, Skand. Akt. Tidskr., 1959.Google Scholar
[8]Dynkin, E. B., Markov Processes I-II, Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg, 1965.Google Scholar
[9]Jung, J., “A theorem on compound Poisson processes with time-dependent change variables”, Skand. Akt. Tidskr., 1963.Google Scholar
[10]Philipson, C. , “A generalized model of the risk process and its application to a tentative evaluation of outstanding liabilities”, Astin Bull. III : 3, 1965.Google Scholar
[11]Thyrion, P., “Notes sur les distributions par grappes”, Bull. Ass. Roy. Act. Belg., 1960.Google Scholar
[12]Thyrion, P., “Extension de la théorie collective du risque”, The Lundberg Symposium, Stockholm, 1968.Google Scholar
[13]Arfwedson, G., “Multipla försäkringsfall, kommentar till ett arbete av P. Thyrion“ (Multiple insurance claims, comments on an article by P. Thyrion), Försäkr. tekn. forskn. nämnden (Council for Insurance Research) 25, Stockholm, 1968.Google Scholar
[14]Cramér, H., Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Uppsala, 1945, and Math. Ser., Princeton, 1946.Google Scholar
[15]Thyrion, P., “Sur vine propriété des processus de Poisson généralisés”, Bull. Ass. Roy. Act. Belg., 1959.Google Scholar
[16]Ammeter, H., “A generalization of the collective theory of risk in regard to fluctuating basic probabilities”, Skand. Akt. Tidskr., 1948.Google Scholar
[17]Philipson, C., “Sur la transformation d'un processus de Poisson composé (selon les méthodes de P. Thyrion et F. Esscher)”, Bull. Ass. Roy. Act. Belg., 1964.Google Scholar
[18]Philipson, C. , “Quelques processus applicables dans l'assurance et dans la biologic”, Bull. Ass. Roy. Act. Belg., 1963.Google Scholar