Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T19:07:22.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The cost of success or failure for proxy signals in ecological problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2024

Peter Nonacs*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Peter Nonacs; Email: peter.nonacs@gmail.com

Abstract

Two of John et al.'s examples of proxy failures in ecological situations are not failures: Runaway sexual selection and marsupial neonate competition. Instead, more appropriate ecological examples may be paternal genetic kin recognition and warning coloration. These differ in proxy effectiveness and failure in ways that illustrate the importance of “costs” in the evolution of ecological proxy traits.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubier, T. G., & Sherratt, T. N. (2020). State-dependent decision-making by predators and its consequences for mimicry. American Naturalist, 196(5), E127E144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, A., & West, S. A. (2010). Greenbeards. Evolution 64, 2538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, A. P. (2000). Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behavioral Ecology 11, 161168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonacs, P. (2011). Kinship, greenbeards, and runaway social selection in the evolution of social insect cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(Suppl. 2), 1080810815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed