Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T07:27:00.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

It's always both: Changing individuals requires changing systems and changing systems requires changing individuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

Alex Madva Open the ORCID record for Alex Madva [Opens in a new window] ,
Michael Brownstein Open the ORCID record for Michael Brownstein [Opens in a new window]  and
Daniel Kelly Open the ORCID record for Daniel Kelly [Opens in a new window]
Alex Madva
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USA alexmadva@gmail.com; https://alexmadva.com/
Michael Brownstein
Affiliation:
John Jay College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA msbrownstein@gmail.com; http://michaelsbrownstein.com
Daniel Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA drkelly@purdue.edu; http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

s-Frames and i-frames do not represent two opposed types of intervention. Rather they are interpretive lenses for focusing on specific aspects of interventions, all of which include individual and structural dimensions. There is no sense to be made of prioritizing either system change or individual change, because each requires the other.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e168
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownstein, M., Kelly, D., & Madva, A. (2022). Individualism, structuralism, and climate change. Environmental Communication, 16(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1982745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, I. R., & Fujita, K. (2012). Change we can believe in: Using perceptions of changeability to promote system-change motives over system-justification motives in information search. Psychological Science, 23(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611423670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D., Faucher, L., & Machery, E. (2010). Getting rid of racism: Assessing three proposals in light of psychological evidence. The Journal of Social Philosophy, 41(3), 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madva, A. (2019). The inevitability of aiming for virtue. In Sherman, B. R. & Stacey, G. (Eds.), Overcoming epistemic injustice: Social and psychological perspectives (pp. 85–100). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Madva, A., Kelly, D., & Brownstein, M. (2023). Change the people or change the policy? On the moral education of antiracists. Ethical Theory & Moral Practice. doi:10.1007/s10677-023-10363-7Google ScholarPubMed
Milkman, K. L., Patel, M., Gandhi, L., Graci, H. N., Gromet, D. M., Ho, H., … Duckworth, A. L. (2021). A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor's appointment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(20), e2101165118 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101165118Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, M. S., Fogel, R., Winegar, A. L., Horseman, C., Ottenbacher, A., Habash, S., … Yehia, B. R. (2022). Effect of text message reminders and vaccine reservations on adherence to a health system COVID-19 vaccination policy: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 5(7), e2222116. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparkman, G., Attari, S. Z., & Weber, E. U. (2021). Moderating spillover: Focusing on personal sustainable behavior rarely hinders and can boost climate policy support. Energy Research & Social Science, 78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, T. L., Latu, I. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Denney, H. T. (2010). Yes we can!: Prejudice reduction through seeing (inequality) and believing (in social change). Psychological Science, 21(11), 1557–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610385354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed