Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T14:26:21.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacterial adhesion to stainless steel is reduced by aqueous fish extract coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2006

N. Bernbom
Affiliation:
Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Department of Seafood Research, Technical University of Denmark, Building 221, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
R. L. Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Department of Seafood Research, Technical University of Denmark, Building 221, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Y. Y. Ng
Affiliation:
Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Department of Seafood Research, Technical University of Denmark, Building 221, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
R. L. Meyer
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Centre (iNANO), University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Building 1521, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
P. Kingshott
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Centre (iNANO), University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Building 1521, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Danish Polymer Centre, Risø National Laboratory, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
R. M. Vejborg
Affiliation:
Centre for Biomedical Microbiology, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Building 301, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
P. Klemm
Affiliation:
Centre for Biomedical Microbiology, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Building 301, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
F. Besenbacher
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Centre (iNANO), University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Building 1521, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
L. Gram*
Affiliation:
Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Department of Seafood Research, Technical University of Denmark, Building 221, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author: Dr L. Gram Danish Institute for Fisheries Research Department of Seafood Research Technical University of Denmark Building 221 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby DenmarkT 45 45 25 25 86 F 45 45 88 47 74 Egram@difres.dk

Abstract

Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on surfaces pose major problems and risks to human health. One way to circumvent this problem is to coat surfaces (in this report stainless steel) with a non-toxic fish extract that generates an abiotic surface with less bacterial attachment than uncoated surfaces or surfaces coated with, for example, tryptone soy broth. The bacteria grow well in the fish extract; hence a general bacteriocidal effect is not the reason for the antifouling effect. Bacterial attachment was quantified by different methods including (a) direct fluorescence microscopy, (b) removal by ultrasound and subsequent quantification of the adhered bacteria, and (c) regrowth of the adhered bacteria measured by indirect conductometry. Surprisingly, the bacterial counts on surfaces coated with aqueous fish extract were 10–100 times lower than on surfaces coated with laboratory broths when surfaces were submerged in bacterial suspensions. The effect was seen for Pseudomonas fluorescens AH2, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, Escherichia coli MG1655, Vibrio anguillarum 90-11-287 and Aeromonas salmonicida Jno 3175/88. It lasted for at least 7 days. Atomic force microscopy showed that steel surfaces conditioned with fish extract were covered by a thin layer of spherical, nanosized particles. Chemical analysis of the surfaces coated with adsorbed fish extract using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed that the layer was proteinaceous and had a thickness less than 2 nm. Numerous protein bands/peaks were also detected by sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry techniques. We conclude that coating the stainless steel surface with fish extract results in a thin protein layer that reduces bacterial adhesion significantly.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

An, Y. H., Stuart, G. W., McDowell, S. J., McDaniel, S. E., Kang, Q. & Friedman, R. J. (1996) Prevention of bacterial adherence to implant surfaces with a crosslinked albumin coating in vitro. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 14, 846849CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagge, D., Hjelm, M., Johansen, C., Huber, I. & Gram, L. (2001) Shewanella putrefaciens adhesion and biofilm formation on food processing surfaces. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67, 23192325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagge-Ravn, D., Ng, Y., Hjelm, M., Christiansen, J. N., Johansen, C. & Gram, L. (2003) The microbial ecology of processing equipment in different fish industries – analysis of the microflora during processing and following cleaning and disinfection. International Journal of Food Microbiology 87, 239250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, L. M., Lo, M. F., Adams, M. R. & Chamberlain, A. H. (1999) Effect of milk proteins on adhesion of bacteria to stainless steel surfaces. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 45434548CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosetti, M., Masse, A., Tobin, E. & Cannas, M. (2002) Silver coated materials for external fixation devices: in vitro biocompatibility and genotoxicity. Biomaterials 23, 887892CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bower, C. K., Daeschel, M. A. & McGuire, J. (1998) Protein antimicrobial barriers to bacterial adhesion. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 27712778CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bremer, P. J., Monk, I. & Butler, R. (2002) Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes/Flavobacterium spp. biofilms using chlorine: impact of substrate, pH, time and concentration. Letters in Applied Microbiology 35, 321325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callow, M. E., Callow, J. A., Ista, L. K., Coleman, S. E., Nolasco, A. C. & Lopez, G. P. (2000) Use of self-assembled monolayers of different wettabilities to study surface selection and primary adhesion processes of green algal (Enteromorpha) zoospores. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66, 32493254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandra, J., Patel, J. D., Li, J., Zhou, G., Mukherjee, P. K., McCormic, T. S., et al. (2005) Modification of surface properties of biomaterials influences the ability of Candida albicans to form biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71, 87958801CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalgaard, P. (1995) Qualitative and quantitative characterization of spoilage bacteria from packed fish. International Journal of Food Microbiology 26, 319333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, R. B., Nagel, J. A., Proctor, R. A. & Cooper, S. L. (1997) Quantitative comparison of shear-dependent Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to three polyurethane ionomer analogs with distinct surface properties. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 36, 1521623.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francolini, I., Norris, P., Piozzi, A., Donelli, G. & Stoodley, P. (2004) Usnic acid, a natural antimicrobial agent able to inhibit bacterial biofilm formation on polymer surfaces. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 48, 43604365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, P., McBain, A. J. & Pickard, A. H. (2003) Formation of microbial biofilm in hygienic situations: a problem of control. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 51, 245248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gram, L., Wedell-Neergaard, C. & Huss, H. H. (1990) The bacteriology of fresh and spoiling Lake Victorian Nile perch (Lates niloticus). International Journal of Food Microbiology 10, 303316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griesser, H. J., McArthur, S. L., Wagner, M. S., Kingshott, P., McLean, K. M. & Castner, D. G. (2003) XPS, ToF-SIMS and MALDI-MS for characterizing adsorbed protein films. In Biopolymers at Intersurfaces, pp. 641669. Edited by Malmsten, M.. New York: Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
Guggenheim, B., Schmid, R., Aeschlimann, J. M., Berrocal, R. & Neeser, J. R. (1999) Powdered milk micellar casein prevents oral colonization by Streptococcus sobrinus and dental caries in rats: a basis for the caries-protective effect of dairy products. Caries Research 33, 446454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hald, A. (1952) Statistical Theory with Engineering Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Holloway, B. W. (1955) Genetic recombination in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Jounal of Genetic Microbiology 13, 572581Google ScholarPubMed
Jansen, B. & Kohnen, W. (1995) Prevention of biofilm formation by polymer modification. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 15, 391396CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansen, C., Falholt, P. & Gram, L. (1997) Enzymatic removal and disinfection of bacterial biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63, 37243728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingshott, P., Wei, J., Bagge-Ravn, D., Gadegaard, N. & Gram, L. (2003) Covalent attachment of poly(ethylene glycol) to surfaces is critical for preventing bacterial adhesion. Langmuir 19, 69126921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemm, P., Jorgensen, B. J., van Die, I., de Ree, H. & Bergmans, H. (1985) The fim genes responsible for synthesis of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli, cloning and genetic organization. Molecular and General Genetics 199, 410414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, C. G. & Anand, S. K. (1998) Significance of microbial biofilms in food industry: a review. International Journal of Food Microbiology 42, 927CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of head of bacteriophage-T4. Nature 227, 680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leriche, V. & Carpentier, B. (1995) Viable but nonculturable Salmonella typhimurium in single- and binary-species biofilms in response to chlorine treatment. Journal of Food Protection 58, 11861191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeyama, R., Kwon, I. K., Mizunoe, Y., Anderson, J. M., Tanaka, M. & Matsuda, T. (2005) Novel bactericidal surface: catechin-loaded surface–erodible polymer prevents biofilm formation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 75, 146155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, B. (2003) Approaches to prevention, removal and killing of biofilms. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 51, 249253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, C. & Gilbert, E. S. (2004) Colorimetric method for identifying plant essential oil components that affect biofilm formation and structure. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70, 69516956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olofsson, A. C., Hermansson, M. & Elwing, H. (2005) Use of a quartz crystal microbalance to investigate the antiadhesive potential of N-acetyl-cysteine. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71, 27052712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, J., Van Der Heijde, Y. & Holmberg, K. (1992) Plaque formation in vivo and bacterial attachment in vitro on permanently hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Caries Research 26, 428433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkar, S. G., Flint, S. H., Palmer, J. S. & Brooks, J. D. (2001) Factors influencing attachment of thermophilic bacilli to stainless steel. Journal of Applied Microbiology 90, 901908CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, G. (1999) Biofilms in infectious disease and on medical devices. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 11, 223226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisner, A., Haagensen, J. A. & Zechner, E. L. (2003) Development and maturation of Escherichia coli K-12 biofilms. Molecular Microbiology 48, 933946CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, L., Van Der Mei, H. C., Banat, I. M., Teixeira, J. & Oliveira, R. (2006) Inhibition of microbial adhesion to silicone rubber treated with biosurfactant from Streptococcus thermophilus A. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 46, 107112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuelsson, M. O. & Kirchman, D. L. (1990) Degradation of adsorbed protein by attached bacteria in relationship to surface hydrophobicity. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56, 36433648CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seah, M. P. (1990) Quantitative AES and XPS. In Practical Surface Analysis, vol. 1, Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, pp. 201255. Edited by Briggs, D. & Seah, M. P.. London: WileyGoogle Scholar
Seah, M. P. & Dench, W. A. (1979) Quantitative electron spectroscopy of surfaces: a standard data base for electron inelastic mean free paths in solids. Surface and Interface Analysis 1, 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skov, M. N., Pedersen, K. & Larsen, J. L. (1995) Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, ribotyping, and plasmid profiling for typing of Vibrio anguillarum serovar O1. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 15401545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speers, J. G. & Gilmour, A. (1985) The influence of milk and milk components on the attachment of bacteria to farm dairy equipment surfaces. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 59, 325332CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Loosdrecht, M. C., Lyklema, J., Norde, W., Schraa, G. & Zehnder, A. J. (1987) Electrophoretic mobility and hydrophobicity as a measured to predict the initial steps of bacterial adhesion. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53, 18981901CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verran, J. & Whitehead, K. (2005) Factors affecting microbial adhesion to stainless steel and other materials used in medical devices. International Journal of Artificial Organs 28, 11381145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wulff, G., Gram, L., Ahrens, P. & Vogel, B. F. (2006) One group of genetically similar Listeria monocytogenes strains frequently dominates and persists in several fish slaughter- and smokehouses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72, 43134322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed