Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T16:10:10.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Progression and Retention of Psychiatric Trainees in Wessex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Zoe Clough*
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Peter Phiri
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Lizi Graves
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Mayura Deshpande
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Jane Hazelgrove
Affiliation:
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To explore factors influencing the progression and retention of Psychiatric trainees in training posts within the Health Education England Wessex region. Specifically: To understand what trainees value most in their training; to determine the degree to which trainees feel supported and valued in their training; to determine self-reported burnout measures in trainees; to understand factors that have a negative impact on training experience; to understand factors that are important to trainees when considering future job roles.

Methods

Online questionnaire survey, capturing both qualitative and quantitative data, open to all Wessex Psychiatric trainees and doctors who had left or completed a Wessex Psychiatry training scheme since 1.1.2018. Responses were collected between 7.6.2021 and 31.7.2021. The survey included a burnout scale, questions about how supported and valued trainees felt during training, and questions regarding career intentions. This project received approval from the Health Research Authority (IRAS 296985).

Results

  • 50 participants completed the survey and were included in analysis.

  • 38% were at risk or high risk of burnout.

  • Trainees felt more supported and valued by individuals such as clinical supervisors (70% felt well or very well supported and valued) than by organisations (41% felt well supported and 34% felt well valued by their Trust and Deanery).

  • Trainees rated ‘work-life balance’ as the thing they valued most in training (64%).

  • Poorly resourced services, trainee workload, lack of role models, experiences of aggression, and defensive practice of seniors were cited as reasons trainees considered leaving Psychiatric training.

  • The three most important factors cited by participants when considering a consultant post were ‘Position available with flexible working’(62%), ‘Position available within a supportive team of colleagues’ (54%) and ‘Positive experience working in the Trust as a Trainee’ (46%).

  • 81% of higher trainees wished to work less than full time in a consultant position once they had completed training.

Conclusion

Flexible working arrangements and work life balance need to be considered in workforce planning. Measures to reduce burnout in psychiatric trainees need to be pro-actively explored by employing Trusts and Deaneries. Mentoring schemes, facilitation of peer support, and clear processes for how to raise concerns regarding supervision are recommended to enhance support for trainees. Junior doctor awards, improved feedback between Trusts and junior doctors and engagement of the Trust board with junior doctors are proposed to improve the sense of value trainees feel. Positive experiences as a trainee are likely to improve retention of local trainees into the local consultant workforce.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.