We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2009
This paper utilizes recent Marxist cultural theory to theorize about the cultural dynamics of racial group conflict in the United States. After laying out a typology of cultural relations between dominant and subordinate groups, the article examines data on African-American cultural penetration of American public culture. The data indicate that since the late 1960s ‘imagerial hegemony’ has yielded to ‘imagerial projection’ for African-Americans. The article concludes by speculating about some interpretations and consequences of this phenomenon.
1 Merelman, Richard M., ‘On Culture and Politics in the United States: A Perspective from Structural Anthropology’, British Journal of Political Science, 19 (1989), 465–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Merelman, Richard M., Partial Visions: Culture and Politics in Britain, Canada, and the United States (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991), chap. 7.Google Scholar
2 I modify the term from Durkheim's usage. See Durkheim, Emile, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans. Swain, Joseph Ward (New York: The Free Press, 1965), p. 483.Google Scholar
3 Adamson, Walter, Hegemony and Revolution: A Study of Antonio Gramsci's Political and Cultural Theory (Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press, 1980), pp. 170–1.Google Scholar
4 Aronowitz, Stanley, False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973)Google Scholar; Lukacs, Gyorgy, History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Marcuse, Herbert, One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (Boston, Mass: Beacon Press, 1964)Google Scholar; Gitlin, Todd, The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of lite New Left (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Gitlin, Todd, Inside Prime Time (New York: Pantheon, 1985).Google Scholar
5 Hoggart, Richard, The Uses of Literacy (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957)Google Scholar; Williams, Raymond, The Long Revolution (New York: Columbia University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
6 Hall, Stuart, Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain (London: Hutchinson, 1976)Google Scholar; Fiske, John, Understanding Popular Culture (Boston, Mass.: Allen & Unwin, 1989)Google Scholar; Willis, Paul, Learning to Labour (London: Saxon House, 1977).Google Scholar
7 Hebdige, Dick, Subculture: The Meaning of Style (London and New York: Routledge, 1979).Google Scholar
8 For a non-Marxist treatment of the same subject, see Scott, James C., Domination and the Arts of Resistance (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
9 For an extensive and interesting overview of African-American images in American popular culture, see Dates, Jannette L. and Barlow, William, eds, Split Image: African Americans in the Mass Media (Washington, DC: Howard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
10 For a complementary study, see Omi, Michael and Winant, Howard, Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1980s (New York and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986).Google Scholar
11 Woollacott, Janet, ‘Fictions and Ideologies: The Case of Situation Comedy’, in Bennett, Tony and Woollacott, Janet, eds, Popular Culture and Social Relations (Milton Keynes, Bucks: Open University Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Gouldner, Alvin, The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class (New York: Macmillan, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Radway, Janice, Reading the Romance: Women. Patriarchy, and Popular Culture (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984).Google Scholar
12 The relevant evidence to support these contentions may be found in, among other places, the following: Jaynes, Gerald David and Williams, Robin M. Jr, eds, A Common Destiny: Blacks and American Society (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Wilson, William Julius, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Hochschild, Jennifer, ‘The Politics of the Estranged Poor’, Ethics, 101, (1991), 560–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Omi, and Winant, , Racial Formation…Google Scholar; Hochschild, Jennifer, The New American Dilemma (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984)Google Scholar. The strongest evidence for racial submission in politics arises from Pinderhughes, Dianne, Race and Ethnicity in Chicago Politics: A Reexamination of Pluralist Theory (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1987)Google Scholar. Softer empirical examinations that yield roughly similar conclusions about politics are Stone, Clarence, Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988 (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Browning, Rufus, Marshall, Dale Rogers and Tabb, David, Protest is Not Enough: The Struggle of Blacks and Hispanics in Urban Politics (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984)Google Scholar; and Button, James, Blacks and Social Change: Impact of the Civil Rights Movement in Southern Communities (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
13 See, for example, Fuchs, Lawrence, The American Kaleidoscope: Race, Ethnicity, and the Civic Culture (Hanover and Boston, Mass.: University Press of New England, 1990).Google Scholar
14 Abercrombie, Nicholas, Class, Structure and Knowledge: Problems in the Sociology of Knowledge (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980), p. 115.Google Scholar
15 See, for example, the otherwise pathbreaking study by Inglehart, Ronald, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
16 See, for example, Lane, Robert E., Political Ideology (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Hochschild, Jennifer, What's Fair: American Beliefs about Distributive Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Reinarman, Craig, American States of Mind (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; and Blauner, Bob, Black Lives, White Lives: Three Decades of Race Relations in America (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1989).Google Scholar
17 For a different view, see Susman, Warren I., Culture as History: The Transformation of American Society in the Twentieth Century (New York: Pantheon, 1984).Google Scholar
18 Fiske, , Understanding Popular Culture.Google Scholar
19 Rogin, Michael, Ronald Reagan, The Movie (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar
20 Ely, Melvin Patrick, The Adventures of Amos ‘N’ Andy: The Social History of an American Phenomenon (New York: The Free Press, 1991).Google Scholar
21 Cripps, Thomas, ‘Making Movies Black’Google Scholar, in Dates, and Barlow, , eds, Split Image, 125–75, p. 157.Google Scholar
22 For the script and a rumination, see Sayles, John, Thinking in Pictures: The Making of the Movie ‘Matewan’ (Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1987).Google Scholar
23 As quoted in Abercrombie, Nicholas, Hill, Stephen and Turner, Bryan S., The Dominant Ideology Thesis (London: Allen & Unwin, 1980), p. 7.Google Scholar
24 Simon, Roger, Gramsci's Political Thought: An Introduction (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1982), pp. 42–5.Google Scholar
25 Edelman, Murray, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964).Google Scholar
26 Thompson, John B., Studies in the Theory of Ideology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984), p. 192Google Scholar; Collins, Randall, ‘The Durkheimian Tradition in Conflict Sociology’, in Alexander, Jeffrey C., ed., Durkheimian Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Thompson, , Studies in the Theory of Ideology, p. 192.Google Scholar
28 Thompson, John B., Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication (Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990), chap. 4.Google Scholar
29 For a similar argument and case study, see Keil, Charles, Urban Blues (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966).Google Scholar
30 Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, ed. and trans, by Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Nowell (New York: International Publishers, 1971), p. 12Google Scholar. See also Bocock, Robert, The Concept of Hegemony (London: Tavistock, 1986).Google Scholar
31 Dates, and Barlow, , Split Image.Google Scholar
32 The classic statement remains Dahl, Robert A., Who Governs? (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
33 Hall, Stuart, The Hard Road to Renewal: Thalcherism and the Crisis of the Left (London: Verso, 1988).Google Scholar
34 Durkheim, Emile, Professional Ethics and Civic Morals (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 The best argument along this line remains Bellah, Robert, ‘Civil Religion in America’, Daedalus (Winter 1967), 1–21.Google Scholar
36 Shils, Edward, Center and Periphery (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975).Google Scholar
37 Information supplied by Congressional Black Caucus.
38 Personal communication, Joint Center for Political Studies, Washington, DC.
39 Personal communication, A. C. Neilsen Corporation.
40 But see Wisconsin State Journal, 18 07 1991.Google Scholar
41 The Washington Post, 3 12 1990.Google Scholar
42 But see the critical article ‘Culture in black and white: why don't Washington's arts institutions reflect our diversity?’ Washington Post, 20 01 1991.Google Scholar
43 Center for the Study of Sport in Society Digest, 3, No. 2 (Summer 1991), p. 4.Google Scholar
44 Christensen, Terry, Reel Politics: American Political Movies from ‘Birth of a Nation’ to ‘Platoon’ (London: Basil Blackwell, 1987), pp. 211–12.Google Scholar
45 See Bates, Karen Grigsby, ‘“They've Gotta Have Us”: Hollywood's Black Directors’, New York Times Magazine, 14 07 1991.Google Scholar
46 Raub, Patricia, ‘The National Geographic Magazine's Portrayal of Urban Ethnicity: The Celebration of Cultural Pluralism and the Promise of Social Mobility’, Journal of Urban History, 14 (1988), 346–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 See, most notably, Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Nice, Richard (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
48 DiMaggio, Paul, ‘Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of US High School Students’, American Sociological Review, 47 (1982), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 See also Lipset, Seymour Martin, Consensus and Conflict: Essays in Political Sociology (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1985), pp. 193–4.Google Scholar
50 Gabler, Neil, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood (New York: Crown, 1988).Google Scholar
51 Miller, Daniel, Material Culture and Mass Consumption (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987).Google Scholar
52 Keil, , Urban Blues.Google Scholar
53 King, Roger, The State in Modern Society: New Directions in Political Sociology (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1986), chap. 3, emphasis added.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 Madison Capital Times, 20 09 1991.Google Scholar
55 Congressional Record, 12 04 1988Google Scholar. I am grateful to Dan Levin for calling this Resolution to my attention.
56 Wisconsin State Journal, 18 07 1991.Google Scholar
57 Olneck, Michael R., ‘The Recurring Dream: Symbolism and Ideology in Intercultural and Multicultural Education’, American Journal of Education, 98 (1990), 147–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Asante, M. K., The Afrocentric View (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
