Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T10:41:24.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consequences of ‘metabolic load’ for lameness and disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

D. N. Logue ,
R. J. Berry ,
J. E. Offer ,
S. J. Chaplin ,
W. M. Crawshaw ,
K. A. Leach ,
P. J. H. Ball  and
J. Bax
D. N. Logue
Affiliation:
SAC Veterinary Science Division
R. J. Berry
Affiliation:
SAC Veterinary Science Division
J. E. Offer
Affiliation:
SAC Veterinary Science Division
S. J. Chaplin
Affiliation:
SAC Veterinary Science Division
W. M. Crawshaw
Affiliation:
SAC Veterinary Science Division
K. A. Leach
Affiliation:
SAC Food Systems Division SAC Auchincruive, Ayr, KA6 5AE
P. J. H. Ball
Affiliation:
SAC Food Systems Division SAC Auchincruive, Ayr, KA6 5AE
J. Bax
Affiliation:
SAC Food Systems Division SAC Auchincruive, Ayr, KA6 5AE
Get access

Abstract

The overall objective of a series of experiments to investigate ‘metabolic stress’ was to examine the relationships between ‘metabolic load’, disease and other parameters associated with the welfare of the dairy cow. In the main, these used several well controlled herd based studies complimented with more basic and strategic investigations. In this paper we compare and contrast practical aspects of health and welfare in two high genetic merit herds managed at the extremes of inputs and outputs for dairy farming in south-west Scotland. The hypothesis was that high output herds would have more health and welfare problems than low input herds. Two herds (70 Holstein-Friesian cows each) at SAC Acrehead Dumfries of a similar genetic background (overall in the top 5% of UK cows by PIN and ITEM), were housed in identical buildings and tended by the same herdsman. Both herds had autumn- and spring-calving cattle. The ‘low input’ herd (LI) was given a minimum of concentrate (approx. 0.5 t per cow per year) and milked twice a day and had a restricted quota of 385 000 l. The ‘high output’ herd (HO) was managed for high yields (unrestricted quota) and was given concentrates (2 t per cow per year) and forage ad libitum and milked three times daily. In 1995-96 the sole source of winter forage was grass/clover silage (LI) or grass silage (HO) but in 1996-1998 ensiled cereal and fodder beet were included in both diets. ‘Metabolic load’ could only be inferred from overall inputs, milk outputs, weight loss, body condition score and behaviour. There were significant differences in 305-day lactation yields between herds, and season of calving especially in 1995-96 (LI autumn; 5952 l at 30 g/kg protein (P); LI spring; 5741 l, 32.5 g/kg P; HO autumn; 9541 l at 32.8 g/kg P; HO spring; 8402 l, 32.6 g/kg P). LI weight and body condition-score losses were greatest in this year and behavioural studies showed substantial differences in feeding time (HO < LI, P < 0.05) and total lying time (LI < HO; P < 0.05). However these differences were much less marked in subsequent years. There was a significant difference in the prevalence and incidence of clinical lameness between herds (HO > LI; P < 0.05) and season (autumn > spring P < 0.05) but not for mastitis or metabolic disease. An in-depth study of subclinical claw horn lesion development in first calving heifers showed significant differences between herds in 1996-97 (LI > HO, P < 0.05) but none in 1995-96. There was a significant difference for season in both years (autumn > spring, P < 0.05). Analysis of blood biochemistry parameters of samples taken at approximately 1 month after calving showed some significant differences between LI and HO generally indicating a greater ‘metabolic load’ for LI. Although the full effects of ‘metabolic load’ on immune function and reproduction are dealt with elsewhere our preliminary data showed no significant differences between herds for the former but some significant differences for the latter, in particular there were differences in aspects of the progesterone profiles between herds and more importantly between seasons. However these latter differences were not clearly reflected in conception rates. It was concluded that the hypothesis was not fully sustained and that both systems had pitfalls in terms of welfare. The three major areas causing difficulties for both systems were the need first to ensure adequate intake of forage; secondly to limit the environmental challenge to the feet and udder and finally to marry these systems to the factors limiting reproduction, primarily calving season and ability of reproduction management.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 24: Metabolic stress in dairy cows , 1999 , pp. 83 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1980. United Kingdom dairy facts and figures, 1980. The Federation of United Kingdom Milk Marketing Boards, Milk Marketing Board of England and Wales, Surrey.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. Dairy facts and figures, 1996. A National Dairy Council Publication, London.Google Scholar
Bazeley, K. and Pinsent, P. J. N. 1984. Preliminary observations on a series of outbreaks of acute laminitis in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 115: 619–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergsten, C. and Herlin, A. H. 1995. Sole haemorrhages and heel horn erosion in dairy cows: the influence of housing system on their prevalence and severity. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 37:395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, R. J., Logue, D. N., Appleby, M. C., Waran, N. K. and Offer, J. E. 1998. Relationship between hoof lesions and the behaviour of cubicle housed Holstein-Friesian cows. Proceedings of the Xth international symposium on lameness in ruminants, Lucerne, Switzerland (ed. Lischer, Ch. J. and Ossent, P.), pp. 56–57.Google Scholar
Blowey, R. W. 1992. Metabolic profiles. In Bovine medicine — diseases and husbandry of cattle (ed. Andrews, A. H., Blowey, R. W., Boyd, H. and Eddy, R. G.), pp. 601–606. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
Boelling, D. and Pollott, G. E. 1997. The genetics of feet, legs and locomotion in cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 65: 2–11.Google Scholar
Boyd, H. 1992. Herd fertility management. In Bovine medicine — diseases and husbandry of cattle (ed. Andrews, A. H., Blowey, R. W., Boyd, H. and Eddy, R. G.), pp. 508–517. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bradley, H. K., Shannon, D. and Neilson, D. R. 1989. Subclinical laminitis in dairy heifers. Veterinary Record 125: 177–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brotherstone, S. and Hill, W. G. 1991. Dairy herd life in relation to linear type traits and production. 1. Phenotypic and genetic analyses in pedigree type classified herds. Animal Production 53:279–287.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R. and Smith, R. D. 1989. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 767–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, S. J. 1994. Behavioural aspects of lameness in dairy heifers. MSc thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Chaplin, S. J.. Offer, J. E. and Logue, D. N. 1998. Metabolic stress and welfare in relation to development of lesions of the claw in first lactation Holstein-Friesian heifers. Proceedings of the Xth international symposium on lameness in ruminants, Lucerne, Switzerland, (ed. Lischer, Ch. J. and Ossent, P.), pp. 57–59.Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. J., Downham, D. Y., Faull, W. B., Hughes, J. W., Manson, F. J., Merrit, J. B., Murray, R. D., Russell, W. B., Sutherst, J. and Ward, W. R. G. P. 1996. Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 138: 563–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colam-Ainsworth, P., Lunn, G. A., Thomas, R. C. and Eddy, R. G. 1989. Behaviour of cows in cubicles and its possible relationship with laminitis in replacement dairy heifers. Veterinary Record 125: 573–575.Google ScholarPubMed
Darwash, A. O. and Lamming, G. E. 1997. Abnormal ovarian patterns as a cause of subfertility in dairy cows: protocols for early detection and treatment. Cattle Practice 5: 3–7.Google Scholar
Darwash, A. O., Lamming, G. E. and Woolliams, J. A. 1997. The phenotypic association between the interval to post-partum ovulation and traditional measures of fertility in dairy cattle. Animal Science 65:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuelson, U. 1988. Recording of production diseases in cattle and possibilities for genetic improvements: a review. Livestock Production Science 20: 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enevoldsen, C., Grohn, Y. T. and Thysen, I. 1991. Sole ulcers in dairy cattle: associations with season, cow characteristics, disease and production. Journal of Dairy Science 74:1284–1298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esslemont, R. J. and Kossiabati, M. A. 1996. Incidence of production diseases and other health problems in a group of dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 139: 486–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1997. Report on the welfare of cattle. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, publication PB3426.Google Scholar
Foote, R. H. 1996. Dairy cattle reproductive physiology research and management — past progress and future prospects. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 980–990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenough, P. R. and Vermunt, J. J. 1991. Evaluation of subclinical laminitis in a dairy herd and observations on associated nutritional and management factors. Veterinary Record 128: 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenough, P. R., Weaver, A. D., Esslemont, R. J. and Galindo, F. A. 1997. Basic concepts of bovine lameness. In Lameness in cattle, third edition (ed. Greenough, P. R. and Weaver, A. D.), pp. 3–13. W. B. Saunders Co., PA, USA.Google Scholar
Grohn, Y. T. Hertl, J. A. and Harman, J. L. 1994. Effect of early lactation milk yield on reproductive disorders in dairy cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 55: 1521–1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herlin, A. H. 1994. Effects of tie stalls or cubicles on dairy cows in grazing or zero grazing situations. Ph.D. dissertation. Svergies Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, J., Lugt, A. W. van der, Werf, J. H. J. van der and Ouweltjes, W. 1994. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production and fertility traits in upgraded dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 40:225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, E. F. and Leaver, J. D. 1990. Lameness in dairy cattle and the type of concentrate given. Animal Production 51: 221–227.Google Scholar
Kempson, S. A. and Logue, D. N. 1993. Ultrastructural observation of hoof horn from dairy cows — the structure of the white line. Veterinary Record 132: 499–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, C. Beever, D. E. and Sorensen, A. 1999. Metabolic loads to be expected from different genotypes under different systems. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 27–35. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Leach, K. A., Logue, D. N., Kempson, S. A., Offer, J. E., Tentent, H. E. and Randall, J. M. 1997. Claw horn lesions in dairy cattle: development of sole and white line haemorrhages during the first lactation. The Veterinary Journal 154: 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, K. A., Logue, D. N., Randall, J. M. and Kempson, S. A. 1998. Claw lesions in dairy cattle: Methods for assessment of sole and white line lesions. The Veterinary Journal 155: 215–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, F. C., O’Connell, J. and O’Farrell, K. 1994. Effect of different housing conditions on behaviour and foot lesions in Friesian heifers. Veterinary Record 134: 490–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, F. C., O’Connell, J. and O’Farrell, K. 1995. Effect of overcrowding on claw health in first-calved Friesian heifers. British Veterinary Journal 152: 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livesey, C. T. and Fleming, F. L. 1984. Nutritional influences on laminitis, sole ulcer and bruised sole in Friesian cows. Veterinary Record 114: 510–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livesey, C. T., Harrington, T., Johnston, A. M., May, S. A. and Metcalf, J. A. 1998. The effect of diet and housing on the development of sole haemorrhages, white line haemorrhages and heel erosions in Holstein heifers. Animal Science 67: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logue, D. N., Offer, J. E. and Hyslop, J. J. 1994. Relationship of diet, hoof type and locomotion score with lesions of the sole and white line in dairy cattle. Animal Production 59: 173–181.Google Scholar
Logue, D. N., Kempson, S. A., Leach, K. A., Offer, J. E. and McGovern, R. E. 1998. Pathology of the white line. Proceedings of the Xth international symposium on lameness in ruminants, Lucerne, Switzerland (ed. Lischer, Ch. J. and Ossent, P.), pp. 142–145.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. T., Freeman, A. E., and Kuck, A. L. 1991. Genetics of health traits. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 1092–1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacCallum, A. J., Knight, C. H., Wilde, C. J. and Hendry, K. A. K. 1998. Cell proliferation and keratinization in bovine hoof during the development of the cow and during lameness challenge. Proceedings of the Xth international symposium on lameness in ruminants, Lucerne, Switzerland (ed. Lischer, Ch. J. and P., Ossent), pp. 236–237.Google Scholar
McDaniel, B. T. and Wilk, J. C. 1991. Lameness in dairy catle. In Proceedings of the BCVA conference, Liverpool, pp. 66–80.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A. and Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1988. Animal nutrition, Longman Scientific, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Midla, L. T., Hoblet, K. H., Weiss, W. P. and Moeschberger, M. L. 1998. Supplemental dietary biotin for prevention of lesions associated with aseptic subclinical laminitis (podermatitis aséptica diffusa) in primiparous cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 59: 733–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manson, F. J. and Leaver, J. D. 1988a. The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47:185–190.Google Scholar
Manson, F. J. and Leaver, J. D. 1988b. The influence of dietary protein intake and of hoof trimming on lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47:191–199.Google Scholar
Manson, F. J. and Leaver, J. D. 1989. The effect of concentrate : silage ratio and of hoof trimming on lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 49:15–22.Google Scholar
Markusfield, O. 1987 Inactive ovaries in high yielding dairy cows before service: aetiology and effect on conception. Veterinary Record 121: 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, A. S., Ward, W. R. and Dobson, H. 1989 Treatment of cystic ovarian disease in cattle-an update Veterinary Bulletin 59:537–555.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. L. and Lawrence, A. B. 1996. Is metabolic load necessarily stressful? Proceedings of the XlXth conference of the world buiatrics congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, vol 1, pp. 79–82.Google Scholar
Offer, J. E., Logue, D. N. and Roberts, D. J. 1997. The effect of protein source on lameness and solear lesion formation in dairy cattle. Animal Science 65: 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offer, J. E., McNulty, D. and Logue, D. N. 1998. Modelling lesion development in a cohort of Holstein-Friesian cows (lactations 1 to 4). Proceedings of the Xth international symposium on lameness in ruminants, Lucerne, Switzerland (ed. Lischer, Ch. J. and Ossent, P.), pp. 159–160.Google Scholar
Olsson, G., Bergsten, C. and Wiktorsson, H. 1998. Influence of diet before and after calving on the food intake, production and health of primiparous cows, with special reference to sole haemorrhages. Animal Science 66:75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterse, D. J., Korver, S., Oldenbroek, J. K. and Talmon, F. P. 1984. Relationship between levels of concentrate feeding and the incidence of sole ulcers in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 115:629–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryce, J. E., Veerkamp, R. F., Thompson, R., Hill, W. G. and Simm, G. 1998 Genetic parameters of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 65:353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, J. E. and Lovendahl, P. 1999 Options to reduce vulnerability to metabolic stress by genetic selection In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 119–127. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Richards, M. W., Wetteman, R. P. and Schoenemann, H. M. 1989 Nutritional anoestrous in beef cows: body weight change, body condition, luteinising hormone in serum and ovarian activity. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1520–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Lainz, A. J., Hird, D. W., Carpenter, T. E. and Read, D. H. 1996. Case control of papillomatous digital dermatitis in Southern California dairy farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 28:117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, A. M. and Rowlands, G. J. 1983 Cosrrel: Computerised recording system for herd health information management. Veterinary Record 112: 189–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senatore, E. M., Butler, W. R. and Oltenacu, P. A. 1997. Relationships between energy balance and post-partum ovarian activity and fertility in first lactation dairy cows. Animal Science 64:17–23.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. C., Nielsen, B. L., Oldham, J. D. and Reid, H. W. 1999 Consequences for immune function of metabolic adaptations to load. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 113–118. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Singh, S. S., Ward, W. R., Lautenbach, K., Hughes, J. W. and Murray, R. D. 1993a. Behaviour of first lactation and adult dairy cows while housed and at pasture and its relationship with sole lesions. Veterinary Record 133: 469–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, S. S., Ward, W. R. and Murray, R. D. 1993b. Aetiology and pathogenesis of sole lesions causing lameness in cattle: a review. Veterinary Bulletin 63: 303–315.Google Scholar
Small, J. A., Charmley, E., Rodd, A. V. and Fredeen, A. H. 1997. Serum mineral concentrations in relation to estrus and conception in beef heifers and cows fed on conserved forage. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C., Leach, K. A., Logue, D. N., Ferris, C. and Phipps, R. H. 1999. Management options to reduce load. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. J. D., Oldham, Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 129–139. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Hill, W. G., Stott, A. W., Brotherstone, S. and Simm, G. 1995. Selection for longevity and yield in dairy cows using transmitting abilities for type and yield. Animal Science 61:189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, J. J. and Greenough, P. R. 1994. Predisposing factors of laminitis in cattle. British Veterinary Journal 150: 151–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vizcarra, J. A., Wettemann, R. P. and Bishop, D. K. 1995. Relationship between puberty in heifers and the cessation of luteal activity after nutritional restriction. Animal Science 61: 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, R., Garnsworthy, P., Gong, J. G., Robinson, R. S. and Wathes, D. C. 1999. Consequences for reproductive function of metabolic adaptation to load. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 99–112. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1995. Welfare strategies in future selection and management strategies. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. J. L., Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), pp. 87–93. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 19. Google Scholar
Wells, S. J., Trent, A. M., Marsh, W. E. and Robinson, R. A. 1993. Prevalence and severity of lameness in lactating dairy cows in a sample of Minnesota and Wisconsin herds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 202: 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whay, H. R., Waterman, A. E. and Webster, A. J. F. 1997. Associations between locomotion, claw lesions and nociceptive threshold in dairy heifers during the peri-partum period. Veterinary Journal 154:155–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whay, H. R., Waterman, A. E., Webster, A. J. F. and O’Brien, J. K. 1998. The influence of lesion type on the duration of hyperalgesia associated with hindlimb lameness in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Journal 156: 23–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilesmith, J. W., Francis, P. G. and Wilson, C. D. 1986. Incidence of clinical mastitis in a cohort of British dairy herds. Veterinary Record 118:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, D. A., Smith, E. J., daRosa, G. L. and Kelly, J. M. 1993. Some effects of nutrition and management on the fertility of dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 133:61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed