Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T22:15:52.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A survey for resistance to acaricides in cattle ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in three major traditional cattle areas in Zambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. M. Luguru
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Tsetse Control Service, Central Veterinary Research Institute, Balmoral, P.O. Box 33890, Lusaka, Zambia
H. G. B. Chizyuka
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Tsetse Control Service, Central Veterinary Research Institute, Balmoral, P.O. Box 33890, Lusaka, Zambia
F. L. Musisi
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Tsetse Control Service, Central Veterinary Research Institute, Balmoral, P.O. Box 33890, Lusaka, Zambia

Abstract

A survey for resistance to acaricides in Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann, Amblyomma variegatum (F.), Boophilus decoloratus (Koch) and B. microplus (Canestrini) was carried out in three important cattle areas of Zambia during three consecutive rainy seasons (November-May) from 1981–82 to 1983–84 to determine the pattern and distribution of resistance to dieldrin, dimethoate, dioxathion and chlorfenvinphos. Resistance was assessed using the FAO resistance test kit. Resistance to dieldrin, dimethoate and dioxathion was found in a greater number of samples from Central and Southern Provinces than from Northern and Eastern Provinces. Relatively high resistance factors were recorded for R. appendiculatus against dimethoate (mean resistance factor (RF) 10·7 ± 3·8×) and dioxathion (mean RF 8·6 ± 1·9×). B. decoloratus from Central and Southern Provinces showed mixed responses to dieldrin and low resistance to dimethoate (mean RF 4·1 ± 2·3×) and dioxathion (6·4 ± 5·0×). Most samples of A. variegatum and B. microplus were susceptible to the four acaricides. Generally, most of the ticks tested showed high susceptibility to chlorfenvinphos.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

FAO (Food & AgricultureOrganization) (1977). Acaricide resistance test kit. Instructions for use.—6 pp. Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
Luguru, S. M., Banda, D. S. & Pegram, R. G. (1984). Susceptibility of ticks to acaricides in Zambia.—Trop. Anim. Health & Prod. 16, 2126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luguru, S. M., Musisi, F. L. & Chizyuka, H. G. B. (1985 a). Control of toxaphene resistant Boophilus decoloratus with chlorfenvinphos.—Vet. Rec. 116, 162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luguru, S. M., Musisi, F. L. & Chizyuka, H. G. B. (1985 b). Observations on the management of acaricides used to control ticks in the traditional cattle sector in Zambia.—Bull. Anim. Hlth Prod. Afr. 33, 159164.Google Scholar
MacLeod, J. & Colbo, M. H. (1976). Ecological studies of ixodid ticks (Acari, Ixodidae) in Zambia. I. Cattle as hosts of the larvae of Amblyomma variegatum (F.) and Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neum.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 6574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J., Colbo, M. H., Madbouly, M. H. & Mwanaumo, B. (1977). Ecological studies of ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in Zambia. III. Seasonal activity and attachment sites on cattle, with notes on other hosts.—Bull. ent. Res. 67, 161173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. & Mwanaumo, B. (1978). Ecological studies on ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in Zambia. IV. Some anomalous infestation patterns in the northern and eastern regions.—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 409429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthysse, J. G. (1954). Report on tickborne diseases.—28 pp. Lusaka, Zambia, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Matthewson, M. D., Blackman, G. G. & Hirst, R. G. (1980). Resistance to certain organophosphorus ixodicides in strains of Boophilus decoloratus from Zambia.—Vet. Rec. 107, 491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed