Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T11:36:53.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emerging varieties of incorporated capitalism. Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rolf Frankenberger
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Science, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

Abstract

The economic success of state-led forms of capitalism in Russia, China and some other autocracies is one of the most challenging developments for existing typologies of comparative political economy research. For the OECD-World complex theories and models assess the interrelation of polity and economy (e.g., Hall/Soskice), while well defined and systematic approaches for autocracies are seldomly found. Most of the existing work are rather idiosyncratic case studies. We argue that by climbing up the ladder of abstraction (Sartori), we gain analytical leverage and comparability between cases and regions. That's why we've developped an idealtype called “incorporated capitalism.” By looking at state-capitalist developments in China, Singapore, Saudi-Arabia or Russia, there is strong empirical evidence for a variety of “incorporated capitalism”: bureaucratic market economies and patrimonial market economies. Why are those types of capitalism so successful? In order to answer this question correctly, we have to consider other questions first: 1) Which are the specific patterns of interaction between polity and economy? 2) What are the unique governance mechanisms in those incorporated capitalisms? Using mainly qualitative methods we will empirically proof our theoretical findings in order to decode the special complementarities of the bureaucratic and patrimonial market economy in those four real types mentioned above.

Type
Research articles
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2014 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahrens, Joachim and Jünemann, Patrick. 2010. “Transitional Institutions, Institutional Complementarities and Economic Performance in China: A ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ approach.” Ordnungspolitische Diskurse no. 2010–2011.Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beblawi, Hazem and Luciani, Giacomo. 1987. The Rentier State. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bian, Yanjie and Ang, Soon. 1997. “Guanxi Networks and Job Mobility in China and Singapore.” Social Forces 75 (3): 9811005.Google Scholar
Blecher, Marc and Shue, Vivienne. 2001. “Into Leather: State-Led Development and the Private Sector in Xinji.” The China Quarterly 166: 368393.Google Scholar
Bohle, Dorothee and Greskovits, Béla. 2012. Capitalist Diversity On Europe's Periphery. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert. 2005. ”How and Why Capitalisms Differ.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/4.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert and Hollingsworth, James. 1997. Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Ian. 2008. “The Return of State Capitalism.” Survival 50 (3): 5563.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Ian. 2009. “State Capitalism Comes of Age.” Foreign Affairs 88 (3): 4055.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, et al. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buhr, Daniel and Frankenberger, Rolf. 2013. “Variationen eines inkorporierten Kapitalismus.” In Der (Wieder-)Aufstieg des Globalen Südens, edited by Noelke, Andreas, Claar, Simone and May, Christian. Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
Clapham, Christopher S. 1982. Private Patronage and Public Power: Political Clientelism in the Modern State. London: Burns & Oates.Google Scholar
Drahokoupil, Jan and Myant, Martin. 2011. Transition Economies: Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duckett, Jane. 1996. “The Emergence of the Entrepreneurial State in Contemporary China.” The Pacific Review 9 (2): 180198.Google Scholar
Duckett, Jane. 1998. The Entrepreneurial State in China. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duckett, Jane. 2001. “Bureaucrats in Business, Chinese-Style: The Lessons of Market Reform and State Entrepreneurialism in the People's Republic of China.” World Development 29 (1): 2337.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1989. “Predatory, Developmental, and Other Apparatuses: A Comparative Political Economy Perspective on the Third World.” Sociological Forum 4 (4): 561587.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter and Heller, Patrick. 2013. “Human Development, State Transformation and the Politics of the Developmental State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformation of the State, edited by Leibfried, Stephan, Nullmeier, Frank, Huber, Evelyne, Lange, Matthew, Levy, Jonah and Stephens, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Stephen. 2006. Russia's Oil Barons and Metal Magnates: Oligarchs and the State in Transition. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Frankenberger, Rolf. 2012. “Frühling – ja, aber wo? Russland im 21. Jahrhundert.” Gesellschaft-Wirtschaft-Politik GWP 61. Jg, Heft 2: 191204.Google Scholar
House, Freedom. 2012a. “Freedom House Freedom in the World 2012 Report.” Accessed 8 January 2013. Available from: <http://www.freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world>..>Google Scholar
House, Freedom. 2012b. “Freedom in the World – Population Trends.” Accessed 8 January 2013. Available from: <http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Population%20Trends%2C%20FIW%201980-2012.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. and Brzezinski, Zbigniew K. 1965. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. “Das Ende der Geschichte: wo stehen wir?” München.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jenniver and Przeworski, Adam. 2006. “Cooperation, Co-optation, and Rebellion Under Dictatorships.” Economics and Politics 18: 126.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jenniver and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40: 12791301.Google Scholar
Gerschewski, Johannes. 2013. “The Three Pillars of Stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation in Autocratic Regimes.” Democratization 20 (1): 1338.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481510.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 2005. “The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 3350.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter and Soskice, David. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter and Gingerich, Daniel. 2004. “Spielarten des Kapitalismus und institutionelle Komplementaritäten in der Makroökonomie.” Berliner Journal für Soziologie 14: 532.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter and Gingerich, Daniel. 2009. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 449482.Google Scholar
Hancké, Bob, Rhodes, Martin and Thatcher, Mark. 2007. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Gregory and Deeg, Richard. 2006. “How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity.” Discussion Paper. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, June.Google Scholar
Lane, David. 2005. “Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Former State Socialist Societies.” Competition and Change 9 (2): 2747.Google Scholar
Lane, Christel and Wood, Geoffrey. 2009. “Capitalist Diversity and Diversity within Capitalism.” Economy and Society 38 (4): 531551.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, Sergio, Musacchio, Aldo, Bandeira-de-Mello, R., and Marcon, R. 2012. “What do Development Banks do? Evidence from Brazil 2002–2009.” Insper Working Paper. Accessed 3 March 2014. Available from: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1969843>..>Google Scholar
Leggett, C. 2011. “Labour markets in Singapore: Flexibility in Adversity.” In The Dynamics of Asian Labour Markets, edited by Benson, J. and Zhu, Y. Oxon and New York: Routledge, 83106.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, Rene and Legg, Keith. 1972. “Political Clientelism and Development: a Preliminary Analysis.” Comparative Politics 4 (2): 149178.Google Scholar
Lin, Nan. 2008. “Emerging Chinese Capitalism and Its Theoretical and Global Implications.” Social Transformations in Chinese Societies 3: 1362.Google Scholar
Lin, Nan. 2010. “Capitalism in China: A Centrally Managed Capitalism (CMC) and Its Future.” Management and Organization Review 7 (1): 6396.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Marcouiller, Douglas and Young, Leslie. 1995. “The Black Hole of Graft: the Predatory State and the Informal Economy.” The American Economic Review 85 (3): 630646.Google Scholar
Mayntz, Renate. 2004. “Governance im modernen Staat.” In Governance. Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen, edited by Benz Wiesbaden, Arthur, 6576.Google Scholar
McGuire, Martin C. and Jr, Mancur Olson. 1996. “The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule: The Invisible Hand and the Use of Force.” Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XXXIV: 7296.Google Scholar
McNally, Christopher A. 2011. “China's Changing Guanxi Capitalism: Private Entrepreneurs between Leninist Control and Relentless Accumulation.” Business and Politics 13 (2): Article 5.Google Scholar
Meyer, Gerd. 2008. Formal Institutions and Informal Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary, Poland, Russia and Ukraine, 2nd edition. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
Moselle, Boaz and Polak, Benjamin. 2001. “A Model of a Predatory State.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (1): 133.Google Scholar
Musacchio, Aldo and Staykow, E. 2011. “Sovereign Wealth Funds: Barbarians at the Gate or White Knights of Globalization?” Harvard Business School: 712-022. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Musacchio, Aldo and Lazzarini, Sergio. 2012. “Leviathan in Business: Varieties of State Capitalism and their Implications for Economic Performance.” Working Paper 12–108: Harvard Business School. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Noelke, Andreas and Vliegenhart, Arjan. 2009. “Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe.” World Politics 61 (4): 670702.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oi, Jean C. 1992. “Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China.” World Politics 45 (1): 99126.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 2000. Power and Prosperity: Uutgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Robinson, Neil. 2011. “Russian Patrimonial Capitalism and the International Financial Crisis.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (3–4): 434455.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64 (4): 10331053.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Schlumberger, Oliver. 2008. “Structural Reform, Economic Order, and Development: Patrimonial Capitalism.” Review of International Political Economy 15 (4): 622649.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2002. The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2009. “Putting the Political Back into Political Economy by Bringing the State Back in Yet Again.” World Politics 61 (3): 516546.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2012. “What Happened to the State-Influenced Market Economies (SMEs)? France, Italy and Spain Confront the Crisis as the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” In The Consequences of the Global Financial Crisis, edited by Wilson, Graham and Grant, Wyn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 156186.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” In The New Corporatism, edited by Pike, F.B. and Stritch, T. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 85131.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America. Busienss, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2005. “Rejoinder: On Terminology, Functionalism, (historical) Institutionalism and Liberalization.” Socio-Economic Review 3: 577587.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ten Brink, Tobias. 2010. “Strukturmerkmale des chinesischen Kapitalismus.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/01, Köln.Google Scholar
Unger, Jonathan and Chan, Anita. 1995. “China, Corporatism, and the East Asian Model.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 33: 2953.Google Scholar
Waisman, Carlos H. 1992. “Capitalisms, the Market, and Democrarcy.” In Reexamining Democracy, edited by Marks, G. and Diamond, L. Newbury Park: Sage: 140155.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wank, David L. 1996. “The Institutional Process of Market Clientelism: Guanxi and Private Business in a South China City.” The China Quarterly 147: 820838.Google Scholar
Way, Lucan A. and Levitsky, Steven. 2006. “The Dynamics of Autocratic Coercion after the Cold War.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39: 387410.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1947. “Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie.” 4th edition, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Whitley, Richard. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, Michael and Redding, Gordon. 2013. “Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters, and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory.” INSEAD Faculty & Research Working Paper. Accessed 3 March 2014. Available from: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2104088>..>Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Data. Accessed 8 January 2013. Available from <http://data.worldbank.org>..>Google Scholar