Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T22:40:37.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE EFFECT OF PREDATOR AGE ON THE FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE OF PODISUS MACULIVENTRIS TO THE PREY SIZE OF GALLERIA MELLONELLA1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. K. Mukerji
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald College of McGill University, Macdonald College P.O., Quebec
E. J. LeRoux
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald College of McGill University, Macdonald College P.O., Quebec

Abstract

Experiments were carried out to determine the effect of age on the functional response of the pentatomid predator Podisus maculiventris (Say), reared in a simple glass jar universe on different prey sizes of Galleria mellonella (L.). Holling’s (1959) ’disc’ equation accurately described the predator’s response at all prey sizes up to 50 days of life. For nymphs, the calculated ’rate of discovery’, a, increased as the predator age increased, but the time of handling prey, b, decreased; for both adult males and females, these calculated values increased gradually up to the 50th day. The relationship between predator age and numbers of prey killed, and predator age and amount of prey body contents consumed (food consumption), was linear at all prey sizes, but mainly negatively so. Prey size was an important component of the predation process for all stages of the predator.It is concluded that ’hunger’ is an important parameter of the attack model since the degree of predator satiation bears directly on b-type activities which in turn affects a-type activities. These findings indicate that under field conditions P. maculiventris will kill more small-sized lepidopterous prey larvae than large-sized ones, and that, because of the greater prey defense of the latter, their survival from predator attacks will increase. These actions may be of considerable importance in the survival of lepidopterous host species.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burnett, T. 1951, Effects of temperature and host density on the rate of increase of an insect parasite. Am. Nat. 85: 337352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, T. 1954. Influences of natural temperatures and controlled host densities on oviposition of an insect parasite. Physiol. Ecol. 27: 239248.Google Scholar
Burnett, T. 1958. Dispersal of an insect parasite over a small plot. Can. Ent. 90: 279283.Google Scholar
DeBach, P., and Smith, H. S.. 1941. The effect of host density on the rate of reproduction of entomophagous parasites. J. econ. Ent. 34: 741745.Google Scholar
Haynes, D. L., and Sisojević, P.. 1966. Predatory behaviour of Philodromus rufus Walckenaer (Araneae : Thomisidae). Can. Ent. 98: 113133.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959, Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Ent. 91: 385398.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1964. An analysis of complex population processes. Can. Ent. 96: 335347.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators of prey density. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 48.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1963. The effect of predator age and prey defense on the functional response of Podisus maculiventris Say to the density of Hyphantria cunea Drury. Can. Ent. 95: 10091020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukerji, M. K., and LeRoux, E. J.. 1965. Laboratory rearing of a Quebec strain of the pentatomid predator, Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Phytoprotection 46: 4060.Google Scholar
Mukerji, M. K., and LeRoux, E. J.. A quantitative study of food consumption and growth of Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). In press.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. E. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 18: 135.Google Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1949 a. Distribution of progeny by Chelonus texanus Cress. (Hym.: Braconidae). Can. Ent. 81: 2544.Google Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1949 b. Distribution of progeny by Cryptus inornatus Pratt. (Hym.: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 81: 285299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar