Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-01T16:35:00.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LIFE HISTORY OF THE APHID HYPERPARASITOID ASAPHES VULGARIS WALKER (PTEROMALIDAE): POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES ON THE EFFICACY OF THE PRIMARY PARASITOID APHIDIUS NIGRIPES ASHMEAD (APHIDIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Jacques Brodeur  and
Jeremy N. McNeil
Jacques Brodeur
Affiliation:
Département de phytologie, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy (Québec), Canada G1K 7P4
Jeremy N. McNeil
Affiliation:
Déartement de biologie, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy (Québec), Canada G1K 7P4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aspects of the life history of the aphid hyperparasitoid Asaphes vulgaris Walker, when reared on Aphidius nigripes Ashmead, were investigated under laboratory conditions. Longevity was significantly related to temperature and to the sex of adults. Female life span was about 4 months at 15 °C compared with 46 days at 25 °C; under the same conditions male longevity was 66 and 19 days, respectively. Females started to oviposit in aphid mummies upon eclosion and lifetime fecundity was high, reaching 1433 offspring. The sex ratio (proportion of males) was low early in reproductive life but rose sharply after several weeks. The implications of these results on the efficacy of A. nigripes in the potato agrosystem are discussed. It is suggested that high hyperparasitoid fecundity and longevity might play a role in reducing the impact of the primary parasitoid.

Résumé

Nous avons étudié au laboratoire certains paramètres démographiques de l’hyperparasitoïde de puceron Asaphes vulgaris Walker, lorsqu’ élevé sur Aphidius nigripes Ashmead. La température et le sexe des adultes influencent la longévité. La durée de vie des femelles est d’environ 4 mois à 15 °C et de 46 jours à 25 °C. En comparaison, la longévité des mâles est respectivement de 66 et 19 jours sous les mêmes conditions. Les femelles, qui initient la ponte dès l’éclosion, ont une fécondité très élevée, pouvant atteindre 1433 descendants. Le rapport des sexe (proportion de mâles) est bas en début de vie reproductive mais augmente rapidement après plusieurs semaines. Nous discutons les conséquences de ces résultats sur l’efficacité de A. nigripes dans l’agrosystème de la pomme de terre. Nous suggérons que la fécondité élevée et la grande longévité de l’hyperparasitoïde sont des facteurs qui peuvent réduire l’impact du parasitoïde primaire.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 6 , December 1994 , pp. 1493 - 1497
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brodeur, J., and McNeil, J.N.. 1989. Biotic and abiotic factors involved in diapause induction of the parasitoid, Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 35: 969–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodeur, J., and McNeil, J.N.. 1992. Host behaviour modification by the endoparasitoid Aphidius nigripes: A strategy to reduce hyperparasitism. Ecological Entomology 17: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodeur, J., and McNeil, J.N.. 1994. Seasonal ecology of Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), a parasitoid of Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environmental Entomology 23: 292–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E.L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarPubMed
Christiansen-Weniger, P. 1992. Wirt-Parasitoid-Beziehung zwischen Blattlausprimärparasitoiden und den Blattlaushyperparasitoiden Aspahes vulgaris Wlk. und Asaphes suspensus (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.Google Scholar
Cloutier, C. 1984. The effect of host density on egg distribution by the solitary parasitoid Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). The Canadian Entomologist 116: 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloutier, C., McNeil, J.N., and Regnière, J.. 1981. Fecundity, longevity, and sex ratio of Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) parasitizing different stages of its host, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Homoptera: Aphididae). The Canadian Entomologist 113: 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, J., and Couture, R.. 1956. Les pucerons de la pomme de terre dans l'est du Québec. 38ième rapport de la Société du Québec pour la protection des plantes. pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
Flanders, S.E. 1965. On the sexuality and sex ratios of hymenopterous parasites. American Naturalist 99: 484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratio. Science 156: 477–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, D.J. 1989. Secondary parasitism and population dynamics of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 62: 203–210.Google Scholar
King, B.H.Offspring sex ratios in parasitoid wasps. Quarterly Review of Biology 62: 367–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, R., Messenger, P.S., and Barbieri, J.F.. 1981. The influence of hyperparasitism on the performance of biological control agents. pp. 34–42 in Rosen, D. (Ed.), The Role of Hyperparasitism in Biological Control: A Symposium. Division of Agriculture, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Mackauer, M., and Völkl, W.. 1993. Regulation of aphid populations by aphidiid wasps: Does parasitoid foraging behaviour or hyperparasitism limit impact? Oecologia 94: 339–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shands, W.A., Simpson, G.W., Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Wave, H.E.. 1965. Parasites of Potato-infesting Aphids in Northeastern Maine. Maine Agricultural Experimental Station Technical Bulletin T–19: 77 pp..Google Scholar
Spencer, H. 1926. Biology of the parasites and hyperparasites of aphids. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 19: 119–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D.J. 1987. Insect hyperparasitism. Annual Review of Entomology 32: 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar