Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T15:32:29.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Localization of Epileptic Foci in Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Warren T. Blume*
Affiliation:
Epilepsy Unit, University Hospital, The University of Western Ontario, London
Masako Kaibara
Affiliation:
Epilepsy Unit, University Hospital, The University of Western Ontario, London
*
University Hospital, EEG Department, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5A5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Electroencephalographic and neuro-imaging data were correlated with the lobe of cortical resective surgery among 48 patients age 16 years or less with medically intractable partial seizures. Decisions about surgery were determined by clinical judgement and therefore our results reflect the weight of these factors in clinical practise. Neuroimaging disclosed a lesion over the operated lobe in 32 patients (67%). Multiple EEGs demonstrated a most active spike focus over the operated lobe in 32 patients (67%). Although only 34 patients had a recorded seizure, this clearly arose over the operated lobe in 23 (68% of the 34 patients; 48% of series). Persistent focal delta activity appeared in 20 of the 48 patients (42%). No instance was encountered in which false lateralization of regional or focal interictal EEG spikes or delta when normal apiculate phenomena were excluded. Thus, the scalp EEG remains a valuable guide to epileptogenesis, even among young patients, and should continue to play a major role in determining the region of cortical resection. Effectiveness of cortical resection for seizure control was clearly better among patients with a single major lesion and among those with normal intelligence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Lemieux, JF, Vera, RS, Blume, WT. Database system for EEG laboratories. American EEG Society Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 2022, 1983.Google Scholar
2.Gloor, P. Commentary: Approaches to localization of the epileptogenic lesion. In: Engel, J, ed. Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. New York: Raven Press, 1987: 97100.Google Scholar
3.Blume, WT, Girvin, JP, Kaufmann, JCE. Childhood brain tumors presenting as chronic uncontrolled focal seizure disorders. Ann Neurol 1982; 12:538541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Goldenshon, ES. Use of the EEG for evaluation of focal intracranial lesions. In: Klass, DW, Daly, DD, eds. Current Practice of Clinical Electroencephalography. New York: Raven Press, 1979: 307341.Google Scholar
5.Blume, WT. Atlas of Pediatric Electroencephalography. New York: Raven Press, 1982: 265.Google Scholar
6.Ajmone Marsan, C, Goldhammer, L. Clinical ictal patterns and electrographic data in cases of partial seizures of fronto-central-parietal origin. In: Brazier, MAB, ed. Epilepsy. Its Phenomena in Man. New York: Academic Press, 1973: 235258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ludwig, B, Ajmone Marsan, C. Clinical ictal patterns in epileptic patients with occipital electroencephalographic foci. Neurology 1975;25:463471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Borghesi, JL, Blume, WT. Interictal determinants of seizure origin. Presented at the Central EEG Society, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, March 2022, 1986.Google Scholar