Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-23T08:05:49.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canadian Mining Companies and Corporate Social Responsibility: Weighing the Impact of Global Norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2007

Hevina S. Dashwood
Hevina S. Dashwood
Affiliation:
Brock University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This study analyzes the factors that led two Canadian mining companies, Noranda and Placer Dome, to adopt polices on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Although much has been written on CSR in the business and organization fields, there has been little scholarly treatment of the topic from a social sciences perspective. A common assumption is that companies are merely reacting to societal pressures from transnational non-governmental organizations. This study challenges that assumption, by weighing the impact of emerging global norms of CSR against influences internal to the companies themselves, and domestic influences operating in Canada. The research findings point to the decisive influence of internal company dynamics and the experience of operating mines in Canada. While emerging global CSR norms are important, their role is more complex than is often assumed, as mining companies have been proactive in their efforts to shape those norms.

Résumé. Cette étude analyse les facteurs qui ont amené deux sociétés minières canadiennes, Noranda et Placer Dome, à adopter des politiques concernant la responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise (RSE). La RSE a fait couler beaucoup d'encre dans le domaine des affaires et de l'organisation, mais peu de chercheurs s'y sont intéressés dans la perspective des sciences sociales. On part très souvent de l'hypothèse que les sociétés se contentent de réagir aux pressions sociales exercées par les organisations non-gouvernementales transnationales. Cette étude remet cette hypothèse en question en comparant l'impact des normes globales émergentes de la RSE aux influences internes aux sociétés elles-mêmes, et aux influences domestiques qui s'exercent au Canada. Les résultats révèlent l'influence décisive des dynamiques internes des sociétés et celle de l'expérience dérivée de l'exploitation des mines au Canada. Les normes globales émergentes en matière de RSE sont certes importantes, mais leur rôle est plus complexe qu'on ne l'admet souvent car les sociétés minières ont joué un rôle très actif dans leur élaboration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 129 - 156
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Since this study was undertaken, both companies have been taken over by other mining companies. Noranda merged with Falconbridge in March 2005, and Falconbridge was taken over by Swiss-based Xstrata in August 2006. In January 2006, Placer Dome was taken over by Barrick Gold, making that company the largest gold company in the world. These developments are reflective of a larger process of consolidation taking place within the mining and minerals sector. While the impact of these takeovers on Placer Dome's and Noranda's CSR policies will be a fascinating subject of future study, the scope of this study remains the influences on these companies' CSR policies, and the impact of emerging norms of CSR.

References

Aguilera, R.V. and G. Jackson. 2003. “The Cross-national Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants.” Academy of Management Review 28: 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakan, Joel. 2004. The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. Toronto: Penguin Group.
Bernstein, Steven. 2006. “Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 1: 139–66.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven and Benjamin Cashore. 2006, forthcoming. “Can Non-State Global Governance be Legitimate? Overcoming the Conundrum of Market-based Authority.” Global Governance.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2006. “Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility.” American Behavioral Scientist 49(7)(March): 925–38.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority.” Governance 15(October): 502–29.Google Scholar
Cashore, B., G. Auld and D. Newsom. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chemers, M.M. and R. Ayman, eds. 1993. Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions. San Diego, CA: Academy Press.
Corcoran, Terence. 1998. “Corporate Green Turns Red.” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), March 21.
Cragg, Wesley, ed. 2005. Ethics Codes, Corporations and the Challenge of Globalization. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Crossan, Mary, Henry Lane and Roderick White. 1999. “An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution.” Academy of Management Review 24(3): 522–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. Claire. 2006. “Transnational Business Civilization, Corporations, and the Privatization of Global Governance.” In Global Corporate Power, ed. Christopher May. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Cutler, A. Claire. 2003. Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, A.C., V. Haufler and T. Porter, eds. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dashwood, Hevina. 2005. “Canadian Mining Companies and the Shaping of Global Norms of Corporate Social Responsibility.” International Journal (Autumn): 977–98.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking Press.
Dobbin, Murray. 2003. The Myth of the Good Corporate Citizen: Canada and Democracy in the Age of Globalization. Toronto: James Lorimer and Company.
Doremus, P., W. Keller, L. Pauly and S. Reich. 1999. The Myth of the Global Corporation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Florini, A., ed. 2000. The Third Force: The Rise of International Civil Society. Washington, DC: Japan Center for International Exchange and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Friedman, Milton. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.” New York Times Magazine, 13 September, 32–33.
Gunningham, Neil, Robert A. Kagan and Dorothy Thornton. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, regulation, and Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Haas, Peter. 1990. Saving the Mediterranean. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hall, R.B. and T.J. Biersteker, eds. 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haufler, Virginia. 1999. “Self-Regulation and Business Norms: Political Risk, Political Activism.” In Private Authority and International Affairs, eds. Claire Cutler, Virginia Haufler and Tony Porter. New York: State University of New York Press.
Haufler, Virginia. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Hemingway, C. and P. Maclagan. 2004. “Manager's Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 50: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Andrew. 1997. From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
ICMM (International Council on Mining and Minerals). 2003. “ICMM Sustainable Development Framework: ICMM Principles.” http://www.icmm.com (June 9, 2005).
IFC (International Finance Corporation). 2005. Policy and Performance Standards on Social and Environmental Sustainability. www.ifc.org. (February 20, 2006).
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2004. Working Report on Social Responsibility (ISO Advisory Group on Social Responsibility). www.iso.ch/iso/en/info (November 15, 2005).
Jacobs, David and Kathleen Getz. 1995. “Dialogue on the Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” The Academy of Management Review 20(4)(October): 793–95.Google Scholar
Keck, M. and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
Kirton, J. and M. Trebilcock, eds. 2004. Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance. Toronto: Ashgate.
Kratochwil, F.V. 1989. Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, D. and A. Prakash. 2003. “Bargains Old and New: Multinational Corporations in Global Governance.” Business and Politics 5(1): 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipschutz, Ronnie. 2000. After Authority: War, Peace and Global Politics in the 21st Century. Albany: State University of New York Press.
March, James and Johan Olsen. 1999. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” In Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, eds. Peter Katzenstein, Robert Keohane and Stephen Krasner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marshall, Julian and Michael Toffel. 2005. “Framing the Elusive Concept of Sustainability: A Sustainability Hierarchy.” Environmental Science and Technology 39(3): 673–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, M., et al. 2003. Mining and Critical Ecosystems: Mapping the Risks. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
MMSD (Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development). 2002. Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development. London: International Institute for Environment and Development. http://www.iied.org/mmsd/finalreport/index.html (December 6, 2003).
National Mining Association. 1996. Plots, Plans and Partnerships: Global Governance and U.S. Mining. Keynote remarks to the Rocky Mountain Coal Mining Institute.
Noranda, Inc./Falconbridge, Ltd. 2003. 2002 Sustainable Development Report. Toronto: Noranda, Inc./Falconbridge, Ltd.
Northhouse, P.G. 1997. Leadership: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
O'Brien, R., A.-M. Goetz, J.A. Scholte and M. Williams, eds. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development). 2001. Corporate Responsibility: Private Initiatives and Public Goals. Paris: OECD.
Ougaard, Morten. 2006. “Instituting the Power to Do Good?” In Global Corporate Power, ed. Christopher May. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Pauly, Louis W. and Simon Reich. 1997. “National Structures and Multinational Corporate Behaviour: enduring differences in the age of globalization.” International Organization 51(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Perlez, J. and K. Johnson. 2005. “Behind Gold's Glitter: Torn Lands and Pointed Questions” The New York Times (New York), October 24.
Placer Dome Inc. 1990. Environmental Management. Vancouver, BC.
Placer Dome Inc. 1997. Taking on the Challenge: Towards Sustainability. Vancouver, BC.
Placer Dome Inc. 1998. Sustainability Policy. Vancouver, BC.
Powell, Walter and Paul DiMaggio, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Prakash, Aseem. 2000. Greening the Firm: The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Resource Futures International. 1998. Sustainable Development and the Mining Industry. Paper commissioned by the ICME. Ottawa, Ontario.
Risse, T., S.C. Ropp and K. Sikkink, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruggie, J.G. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London and New York: Routledge.
Ruggie, J.G. 2002. “The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Global Compact.” Journal of Corporate Citizenship 5: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J.G. 2004. “Reconstituting the Global Public Domain—Issues, Actors, and Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 10(4): 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, Jan A. 2000. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sell, Susan K. and Aseem Prakash. 2004. “Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest Between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights” International Studies Quarterly 48: 143–175.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” The Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 1996. Expert Mission Assessment Report (September). New York.
Vogel, David. 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Webb, Kernaghan, ed. 2002. Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation. Ottawa: Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, Carleton University.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolf, Klaus Dieter, Nicole Deitelhoff and Stefan Engert. 2006. “Corporate Security Responsibility: The Contribution of Corporations to ‘Good Governance’ in Zones of Conflict–A Framework for Comparative Research.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference (San Diego, March 22).