Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T17:38:27.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Éditorial: Le soutien à domicile — Une structure très fragile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Sheila M. Neysmith
Sheila M. Neysmith
Affiliation:
(Auckland, N-Z., février 1999)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial/Éditorial
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Été/Summer 1999 , pp. vi - x
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1999

References

Aston, T. (1999). The health reforms: To market and back? Boston, Dans J., Dalziel, P. et St. John, S. (Éds.), Redesigning the New Zealand welfare state (pp. 134–153). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neysmith, S. (1995). Would a national information system promote the development of a Canadian home and community care policy? An examination of the Australian experience. Canadian Public Policy-Analyse de Politiques, 31(2), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santé Canada. (1998a). Conference on national approaches to pharmacare. Proceedings. January 18–20. Prepared by Karen Graham, Panacea Consulting Inc.Google Scholar
Santé Canada. (1998b). National conference on health info-structure. Final Report. February 8–10. Prepared by Marc Lee.Google Scholar
Santé Canada. (1998c). National conference on home care: Proceedings. March 8–10. Prepared by Helen Patriquin of the Nova Scotia Association of Health Organizations.Google Scholar
Shapiro, E. (1997). The cost of privatization: A case study of home care in Manitoba. Winnipeg: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.Google Scholar