Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T15:29:00.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parent communication with care teams and preparation for family meetings in the paediatric cardiac ICU: a qualitative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2023

Colette Gramszlo*
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Hannah Girgis
Affiliation:
Northeast Ohio Medical School, Rootstown, OH, USA
Douglas Hill
Affiliation:
Pediatric Advanced Care Team, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA Center for Clinical Futures, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Jennifer K. Walter
Affiliation:
Pediatric Advanced Care Team, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA Center for Clinical Futures, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
*
Corresponding author: C. Gramszlo; Email: gramszloc@chop.edu

Abstract

Objective:

The paediatric cardiac ICU presents unique challenges to optimal communication practices, which may impact participation in medical decision-making and long-term psychosocial outcomes for families. This study characterised parent perceptions of (1) team practices that impeded or facilitated communication and (2) preparation for family meetings with interprofessional care teams during extended cardiac ICU admissions.

Methods:

A purposive sample of parents of children admitted to the cardiac ICU was selected to participate in interviews about their communication experiences. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach.

Results:

Twenty-three parents of 18 patients participated with an average length of stay of 55 days at the time of interview. Team practices that impeded communication included inaccurate/incomplete communication, inconsistent within team communication/coordination, and feeling overwhelmed by too many team members/questions. Team practices that facilitated communication included valuing parent preferences, provider continuity, explaining jargon, and eliciting questions. Preparation for family meetings included team practices, parental preferences, and experiences when learning about family meetings (including apprehension about meetings). Family meetings were described as valued opportunities to improve communication.

Conclusion:

Communication with medical teams represents a modifiable determinant of long-term outcomes for families of children in the cardiac ICU. When parents are included as valued members of their child’s care team, they are more likely to feel a sense of control over their child’s outcomes, even in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Family meetings represent an important opportunity to repair fractures in trust between families and care teams and overcome barriers to communication between parties.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Simeone, S, Pucciarelli, G, Perrone, M, et al. The lived experiences of the parents of children admitted to a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Heart Lung 2018; 47: 631637. DOI 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.08.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neubauer, K, Williams, EP, Donohue, PK, Boss, RD. Communication and decision-making regarding children with critical cardiac disease: a systematic review of family preferences. Cardiol Young 2018; 28: 10881092. DOI 10.1017/S1047951118001233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasparian, NA, Kan, JM, Sood, E, Wray, J, Pincus, HA, Newburger, JW. Mental health care for parents of babies with congenital heart disease during intensive care unit admission: systematic review and statement of best practice. Early Hum Dev 2019; 139: 104837. DOI 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.104837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolf-King, SE, Anger, A, Arnold, EA, Weiss, SJ, Teitel, D. Mental health among parents of children with critical congenital heart defects: a systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e004862. DOI 10.1161/JAHA.116.004862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muscara, F, Burke, K, McCarthy, MC, et al. Parent distress reactions following a serious illness or injury in their child: a protocol paper for the take a breath cohort study. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15: 153. DOI 10.1186/s12888-015-0519-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yagiela, LM, Carlton, EF, Meert, KL, Odetola, FO, Cousino, MK. Parent medical traumatic stress and associated family outcomes after pediatric critical illness: a systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019; 20: 759768. DOI 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yagiela, LM, Harper, FWK, Meert, KL. Reframing pediatric cardiac intensive care outcomes: the importance of the family and the role of pediatric medical traumatic stress. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 2018; 48: 27. DOI 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2018.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sood, E, Karpyn, A, Demianczyk, AC, et al. Mothers and fathers experience stress of congenital heart disease differently: recommendations for pediatric critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2018; 19: 1634. DOI 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, JE, Aslakson, RA, Long, AC, et al. Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Crit Care Med 2017; 45: 103128. DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, C, Knafl, KA, Docherty, S, Santacroce, SJ. Parent perceptions of the impact of the paediatric intensive care environment on delivery of family-centred care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2019; 50: 8894. DOI 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.07.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsac, ML, Kindler, C, Weiss, D, Ragsdale, L. Let’s talk about it: supporting family communication during end-of-life care of pediatric patients. J Palliat Med 2018; 21: 862878. DOI 10.1089/jpm.2017.0307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MK, Blume, ED, Samsel, C, Elia, E, Brown, DW, Morell, E. Parent-provider communication in hospitalized children with advanced heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2022; 10: 17611769. DOI 10.1007/s00246-022-02913-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, JK, Schall, TE, DeWitt, AG, et al. Interprofessional team member communication patterns, teamwork, and collaboration in pre-family meeting huddles in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58: 1118. DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
October, TW, Dizon, ZB, Roter, DL. Is it my turn to speak? An analysis of the dialogue in the family-physician intensive care unit conference. Patient Educ Couns 2018; 101: 647652. DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, JK, Sachs, E, Schall, TE, et al. Interprofessional teamwork during family meetings in the pediatric cardiac intensive care uni. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57: 10891098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderfer, MA, Sood, E. Using qualitative research methods to improve clinical care in pediatric psychology. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol 2016; 4: 358361. DOI 10.1037/cpp0000164.Google Scholar
Tong, A, Sainsbury, P, Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349357. DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, JK, Hill, D, Drust, WA, et al. Intervention codesign in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit to improve family meetings. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022; 64: 816. DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.03.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, A, Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research, SAGE Publications, Incorporated, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1990.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory: a practical guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006.Google Scholar
NVivo, Published online, 2018, NVivo. Published online 2018. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home Google Scholar
Barbour, RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001; 322: 11151117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patton, MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.Google Scholar
Knight Lozano, R, May, S, Clarkson, C, Sarjeant, R. Caregiver experiences of paediatric inpatient cardiac services: a qualitative systematic review. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2020; 14: 1474515120951974–159. DOI 10.1177/1474515120951974.Google Scholar
McWhorter, LG, Christofferson, J, Neely, T, et al. Parental post-traumatic stress, overprotective parenting, and emotional and behavioural problems for children with critical congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2022; 32: 738745. DOI 10.1017/S1047951121002912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Man, MACP, Segers, EW, Schappin, R, et al. Parental experiences of their infant’s hospital admission undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992 2021; 110: 17301740. DOI 10.1111/apa.15694.Google ScholarPubMed
Gramszlo, C, Karpyn, A, Christofferson, J, et al. Supporting parenting during infant hospitalization for CHD. Cardiol Young 2020; 30: 14221428. DOI 10.1017/S1047951120002139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morell, E, Wolfe, J, Scheurer, M, et al. Patterns of care at end of life in children with advanced heart disease, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 166, 2012: 745748. DOI 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morell, E, Miller, MK, Lu, M, et al. Parent and physician understanding of prognosis in hospitalized children with advanced heart disease, J Am Heart Assoc 10, 2021: e018488, 10.1161/JAHA.120.018488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazak, AE, Kassam-Adams, N, Schneider, S, Zelikovsky, N Alderfer, MA Rourke, M. An integrative model of pediatric medical traumatic stress. J Pediatr Psychol 2006; 31: 343355. DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazak, AE, Schneider, S, Didonato, S, Pai, ALH. Family psychosocial risk screening guided by the pediatric psychosocial preventative health model (PPPHM) using the psychosocial assessment tool (PAT). Acta Oncol 2015; 54: 574580. DOI 10.3109/0284186X.2014.995774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alzawad, Z, Lewis, FM, Kantrowitz-Gordon, I, Howells, AJ. A qualitative study of parents’ experiences in the pediatric intensive care unit: riding a roller coaster. J Pediatr Nurs 2020; 51: 814. DOI 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.11.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar