Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T19:52:24.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the second week post-race an adequate period to assess the effect of a long-term conditioning on digestive physiology in competing endurance horses?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

A G Goachet ,
C Philippeau ,
M Varloud  and
V Julliand
A G Goachet*
Affiliation:
URANIE, 26 bd Dr Petitjean, BP 87999, 21079Dijon Cedex, France
C Philippeau
Affiliation:
URANIE, 26 bd Dr Petitjean, BP 87999, 21079Dijon Cedex, France
M Varloud
Affiliation:
EVIALIS, Talhouët, 56250St. Nolff, France
V Julliand
Affiliation:
URANIE, 26 bd Dr Petitjean, BP 87999, 21079Dijon Cedex, France
*
*Corresponding author: ag.goachet@agrosupdijon.fr
Get access

Abstract

In human athletes, the physiological effects of physical activity on digestion could differ depending on whether it is a bout of exercise or a long-term conditioning. When the aim is to investigate the effect of long-term endurance training on the digestive physiology in competing horses, animals need to be at complete rest during the digestibility and mean retention time (MRT) measurements. We hypothesized that the resting period allowed to horses post-race, and particularly the second week following an endurance race, could be an adequate period to assess digestive physiology and that measurements would still be representative of the pre-competition status. Nutrient total tract apparent digestibility, total MRT and faecal microbial composition and activity measured before a 90 km endurance race were compared with the data obtained post-race, during the second week of the resting period. No differences in the digestibility coefficients, MRT, faecal pH, lactate concentrations and bacterial counts were observed before and after the endurance race. The propionate proportion was higher and the (C2+C4):C3 ratio was lower during the second week post-race than before the race. Carrying out measurements during the second week post-race provides data close to the pre-race status, and avoids an a disturbed training schedule and unnecessary stress before the race in competing endurance horses.

Keywords

equineendurancemethodologytotal tract apparent digestibilitytotal mean retention timedigestive ecosystem
Type
Research Paper
Information
Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 5 , Issue 3-4 , November 2008 , pp. 143 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Orton, RK, Hume, ID and Leng, RA (1985). Effects of exercise and level of dietary protein on digestive function in horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 17: 386–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Pagan, JD, Harris, P, Brewster-Barnes, T, Duren, SE and Jackson, SG (1998). Exercise affects digestibility and rate of passage of all-forage and mixed diets in Thoroughbred horses. Journal of Nutrition 128: 2704S–2707S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Katsuki, R, Asai, Y and Fujikawa, H (1998). Effect of exercise on the apparent energy digestibility of timothy and alfalfa hay in Thoroughbred horses. Journal of Equine Science 9: 29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Bergero, D, Peiretti, PG and Cola, E (2002). Intake and apparent digestibility of perennial ryegrass haylages fed to ponies either at maintenance or at work. Livestock Production Science 77: 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Peters, HPF, de Vries, WR, Vanberge-Henegouwen, GP and Akkermans, LMA (2001). Potential benefits and hazards of physical activity and exercise on the gastrointestinal tract. Gut 48: 435–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Foreman, JH (1998). The exhausted horse syndrome. Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice 14: 205–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7INRA-HN-IE, (1997). Notation de l'état corporel des chevaux de selle et de sport [Rating of the body condition of riding horses and sport]. Guide pratique [Practical Guide]. Paris: Institut de l'élevage.Google Scholar
8Goachet, AG, Philippeau, C, Varloud, M and Julliand, V (2009, in press). Adaptations to standard approaches for measuring total tract apparent digestibility and gastro-intestinal retention time in horses in training. Animal Feed Science and Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Sutton, EI, Bowland, JP and McCarthy, JF (1977). Studies with horses comparing 4 N-HCl insoluble ash as an index material with total fecal collection in the determination of apparent digestibilities. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57: 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991). Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Hyslop, JJ (2005). Algebraic methods to determine total mean retention time of digesta in ponies given ad libitum access to pelleted diets containing different levels of unmolassed sugar beet pulp. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, Penicuik, UK., pp. 48.Google Scholar
12Drogoul, C, Poncet, C and Tisserand, JL (2000). Feeding ground and pelleted hay rather than chopped hay to ponies. 1. Consequences for in vivo digestibility and rate of passage of digesta. Animal Feed Science and Technology 87: 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Siddons, RC, Paradine, J, Beever, DE and Cornell, PR (1985). Ytterbium acetate as a particulate-phase digesta-flow marker. British Journal of Nutrition 54: 509–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Bryant, MP and Burkey, LA (1953). Cultural methods and some characteristics of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 36: 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Leeddle, JAZ and Hespell, RE (1980). Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate-utilizing subgroups in rumen bacteria populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 34: 709–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Julliand, V, de Vaux, A, Millet, L and Fonty, G (1999). Identification of Ruminococcus flavefaciens as the predominant celluloytic bacterial species of the equine cecum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65: 3741–3788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Mackie, RI and Heath, AB (1979). Enumeration and isolation of lactate-utilizing bacteria from the rumen of sheep. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 38: 416–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Halliwell, G and Bryant, MP (1963). The cellulolytic activity of pure culture strains of bacteria from the rumen of cattle. Journal of Generic Microbiology 32: 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Baruc, JC, Dawson, KA and Baker, JP (1983). The characterization and nitrogen metabolism of equine caecal bacteria. Proceedings of the 8th Equine Nutrition and Physiology Symposium, University of Kentucky, USA, pp. 151–156.Google Scholar
20Hughes, B and Plantat, JL (1983). Calculation of the most probable number acceptance limit in case of important number of inoculums by dilution. Chemosphere 12: 1679–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Jouany, JP (1982). Volatile fatty acid and alcohol determination in digestive contents, silage juices, bacterial cultures and anaerobic fermentor contents. Sciences des Aliments 2: 131–144.Google Scholar
22Pys, JB (2000). Comparison of digestibility of horse diets determined by difference and marker methods. Acta Agraria et Silvestria Series Zootechnica 38: 39–48.Google Scholar
23Santos, AS, Abreu, JM and Dias-Da-Silva, AA (2005). Apparent digestibility of mixed diets in horses determined by acid-insoluble ash and acid detergent lignin as internal markers. Pferdeheilkunde 21: 51–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Thielemans, MF, François, E, Bodart, C and Thewis, A (1978). Mesure du transit gastrointestinal chez le porc à l'aide des radiolanthanides. Comparaison avec le mouton [Gastrointestinal transit in the pig: measurement using radioactive lanthanides and comparison with sheep]. Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 18: 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25SAS (2003). Version 8.e SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
26Jansen, WL, Van der Kuilen, J, Geelen, SNJ and Beynen, AC (2000). The effect of replacing nonstructural carbohydrates with soybean oil on digestibility of fibre in trotting horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 32: 27–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Trombetta, MF, Mattii, S and Falaschini, A (2007). Sunflower cake in the diet of Quarter Horses in activity. Italian Journal Animal Science 6: 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Webb, SP, Potter, GD and Evans, JW (1987). Physiologic and metabolic response of race and cutting horses to added dietary fat. Proceedings of the 10th Equine Nutrition and Physiology Symposium, Ft Collins, Colorado, USA, pp. 115–120.Google Scholar
29Mathiason-Kochan, KJ, Potter, GD, Caggiano, S and Michael, EM (2001). Ration digestibility, water balance and physiologic responses in horses fed varying diets and exercised in hot weather. Proceedings of the 17th Symposium of the Equine Nutrition and Physiology Society, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, pp. 261–266.Google Scholar
30Jansen, WL, Geelen, SN, Van der Kuilen, J and Beynen, AC (2002). Dietary soyabean oil depresses the apparent digestibility of fibre in trotters when substituted for an iso-energetic amount of corn starch or glucose. Equine Veterinary Journal 34: 302–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Austbo, D and Volden, H (2006). Influence of passage model and caecal cannulation on estimated passage kinetics of roughage and concentrate in the gastrointestinal tract of horses. Livestock Science 100: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Julliand, V and Goachet, AG (2005). Faecal microflora as a marker of caecal or colonic microflora in horses?Proceedings of the 18th Equine Science Society Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, USA, June, pp. 140.Google Scholar
33Goachet, AG, Varloud, M, Couroucé-Malblanc, A and Julliand, V (2007). Effet de l'entraînement d'endurance sur la digestibilité de la ration et sur la microflore digestive de chevaux de CEN* et CEI** [Effect of endurance training on the digestibility of the ration and the digestive microflora of horses and IEC CEN***]. Proceedings AVEF, Deauville, France.Google Scholar
34Richards, N, Hinch, GN and Rowe, JB (2006). The effect of current grain feeding practices on hindgut starch fermentation and acidosis in the Australian racing Thoroughbred. Australian Veterinary Journal 84: 402–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Sauvant, D, Chapoutot, P and Archimède, H (1994). La digestion des amidons par les ruminants et ses conséquences [The digestion of starch by ruminants and its implications]. INRA Productions Animales 7: 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Goachet, AG (2006). Us et coutumes vs. alimentation raisonnée du cheval d'endurance [Habits and customs vs. diet- wise horse endurance]. Congrès de l'AVEF [Congress of the AVEF], Versailles, France, October, pp. 8.Google Scholar