Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T12:33:25.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

European Political Emigrations: A Lost Subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Robert C. Williams
Affiliation:
Williams College

Extract

Historians generally dislike lost causes. They seek to explain what happened, rather than what might have been, and have consequently neglected the story of political emigrations. Granted, the study of dmigres is full of methodological pitfalls for the unwary: biased accounts of past issues, outright forgeries of documentary evidence, personal recriminations that serve to distort political reality, and a pervasive mood of bitterness, acrimony, nostalgia, and endless hope. Yet it is an important story, not only because of its intrinsic merit as a political phenomenon worth studying, but also because of the effect that exiles have had both in their place of refuge and in their homeland when they have been able to return. He who would ignore the émigrés might do well to recall that the experience of exile helped fashion the political careers of Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky, as well as of Charles II and Louis XVIII.

Type
Political Emigration
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Few recent studies have considered the politics of the exiles themselves, but only the politics which drove them abroad. A notable exception is the study of anti-Nazi refugees after 1933 by Edinger, L. J., German Exile Politics (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1956)Google Scholar. General studies of political refugees are more available, among them Cirtautas, K., The Refugee; A Psychological Study (Boston, 1957)Google Scholar; Murphy, H., Flight and Resettlement (Lucerne, 1955)Google Scholar; Stoessinger, J., The Refugee and the World Community (Minneapolis, 1956)Google Scholar; Schechtman, J., The Refugee in the World (New York, 1963).Google Scholar

2 Most studies of the Huguenots have focused on the economic effect of religious persecution, both in France and in their places of refuge. A recent example is the study of Scoville, W. C., The Persecution of Huguenots and French Economic Development 1680–1720 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1960).Google Scholar

3 Wicks, M. C., The Italian Exiles in London 1816–1848 (Manchester, 1937).Google Scholar

4 Tayler, H., Jacobite Epilogue (London. 1941), xiiGoogle Scholar; on the Jacobites see in particular the standard works by SirPetrie, Charles, The Stuart Pretenders (Boston and New York, 1935)Google Scholar and The Jacobite Movement (London, 1948, 1950; 2 vols.)Google Scholar, as well as the more recent study of Jones, G. H., The Main Stream of Jacobitism (Cambridge, Mass., 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 On the Russian emigration in the 1920s see Rimscha, Hans von, Russland jenseits der Grenzen 1921–1926 (Jena, 1927)Google Scholar and the more recent Volkmann, Hans-Erich, Die Russische Emigration nach Deutschland 1919–1929 (Würzburg, 1966)Google Scholar. On the emigration in the 1930s and during and after World War II see Dvinov, B., Politics of the Russian Emigration (Santa Monica, 1955)Google Scholar and Fischer, G., Russian Émigré Politics (New York 1951).Google Scholar

6 Greer, D., The Incidence of Emigration during the French Revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1951). p. 22.Google Scholar

7 Payne, H. C. and Grosshans, H., ‘The Exiled Revolutionaries and the French Political Police in the 1850s’, American Historical Review, LXVIII, 4 (July 1963), 954–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 For a historical survey of the legal problems of states admitting political refugees, see Kirchheimer, O., ‘Asylum’, American Political Science Review, LIII, 4 (December 1959), 9851016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Riasanovsky, N., ‘The Emergence of Eurasianism’, California Slavic Studies, IV (1967), 71.Google Scholar

10 On the political and cultural role of Baltic Germans and Jews as intermediaries for Russians living in Germany, see Williams, R., ‘Russians in Germany: 1900-1914’, Journal of Contemporary History, I, 4 (October 1966), 121–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Coleman, A. P., ‘The Great Emigration’, Cambridge History of Poland (Cambridge, 1941), II, 311–23.Google Scholar

12 Oberländer, E., ‘The All-Russian Fascist Party’, Journal of Contemporary History, I, 1 (1966), 158–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Hardacre, P. H., ‘The Royalists in Exile during the Puritan Revolution, 1642–1660’, Huntingdon Library Quarterly, XVI, 4 (19521953), 363.Google Scholar

14 On the relationship between political emigration and the migration of ideas, values, and technical knowledge, see the essays by Boas, Franz, Speier, Hans, Tillich, Paul, and Lasswell, Harold in Social Research, IV, 3 (September 1937), 286328.Google Scholar

15 Brandes, G., Main Currents in Nineteenth-Century Literature (New York, 19011905, 6 vols.)Google Scholar. On the effect of exile on literary creativity, see also Levin, H., ‘Literature and Exile’, in his Refractions: Essays in Comparative Literature (New York, 1966), pp. 6281.Google Scholar

16 On the contribution of right-wing Russian émigrés to the Hitler movement in the 1920s see Laqueur, W., Russia and Germany (London, 1965). The Mensheviks were the Russian experts in the pages of the German socialist newspapers ‘Freiheit’ (USPD) and ‘Vorwárts’ (SPD) in the 1920s, as well as Rudolf Hilferding‘s ‘Die Gesellschaft’.Google Scholar

17 Kurtz, H., ‘The French Emigration 1789-1814’, History Today, XIII, 3 (March 1963), 186.Google Scholar

18 On the Italian resistance to Mussolini see Delzell, C. F., ‘The Italian Anti-Fascist Emigration 1922–1943’, Journal of Central European Affairs, XII, 1 (April 1952), 2055.Google Scholar

19 Nabokov is a particularly acute chronicler of the life of political émigrés, in his case Russians, in his novels and stories, notably The Gift, Despair, Pnin, The Eye, and The Defense. On Nabokov himself see the recent studies by Field, A., Nabokov: His Life in Art (Boston-Toronto, 1967)Google Scholar and Stegner, P., Escape into Aesthetics: The Art of Vladimir Nabokov (New York, 1966).Google Scholar

20 Herzen, A., My Past and Thoughts (New York, 1925), IV, pp. 167–8.Google Scholar

21 Baumer, F., ‘Twentieth-Century Version of the Apocalypse’, Journal of World History, I (January 1954), 623–40.Google Scholar

22 Luthy, H., ‘What’s the Point of History?, Journal of Contemporary History, III, 2 (1968). 7.Google Scholar