Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T08:30:05.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conditioning for Dancers: Investigating Some Assumptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Extract

There are many assumptions about dance conditioning which are thought to be “myths” and have no basis in fact. The use of kinesiological analysis is relatively new to dance and many of the “old wive's tales” of dance conditioning are still passed on in some dance studios. Following are listed four assumptions about dance conditioning:

1. The dancer who works with weights will develop excessive muscle bulk.

2. If a dancer increases strength of a given area or muscle group, there will be a reduction of the range of motion of that area.

3. If a dancer increases range of motion at a given joint in one direction (for example: inward rotation of the hip joint), there will be an equal reduction of the range of motion in the opposite direction (in this case, outward rotation).

4. The cardiovascular conditioning received in technique class is sufficient to achieve high physical performance levels.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

deVries, Herbert. “Evaluation of static stretching procedures for improvement of flexibility.” Research Quarterly, 33, 1961, 222–29.Google Scholar
Fitt, Sally S. “Identification of some conditions that encourage dance injuries and preventative measures.” In AAHPER Research Consortium Symposium Papers, Corkin, Charles, ed., 1(2), 1978, 7177.Google Scholar
Fitt, Sally S.The use of reciprocal inhibition to stretch connective tissue of muscles.” CAPHER Journal, Spring, 1970.Google Scholar
Games, Paul and Klare, George. Elementary Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar