Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T22:43:22.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History Teaching in Romania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Speranta Dumitru Nalin
Speranta Dumitru Nalin*
Affiliation:
CNRS, Lyon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Relationships to time through memory or projection form a particular axis along which the post-communist space reshapes, constructs and understands its identity. Caught between a public rejection of the communist past and a need for roots in the recent past, if only for narrative reasons, and cornered by the near future in the name of transition, the postcommunist societies face a dilemma in their search for identity. The weight of this dilemma can be directly measured by the level of consensus around the passing of certain ‘reparation’ laws, such as the restitution of nationalised property or ‘lustration’, however it can also be seen in other public debates. This sheds light on the difficulties that a society may experience in adopting a collectively-accepted narrative, which then forms the basis on which it constructs its identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 49 , Issue 194 , June 2002 , pp. 40 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Council of Europe, Secondary Education in Bulgaria, CE, 1995.Google Scholar
Council of Europe, Secondary Education in Poland, CE, 1996.Google Scholar
Council of Europe, Secondary Education in Slovenia, CE, 1995.Google Scholar
Durandin, Catherine, L'engagement des intellectuels à l'Est. Mémoires et analyses en Roumanie et en Hongrie, Bucharest, L'Harmattan 1994.Google Scholar
Ferro, Marc, L'Histoire sous surveillance: science et conscience de l'histoire, Paris, Gallimard 1987.Google Scholar
Garros, Véronique, ‘Dans l'ex URSS: de la difficulté d'écrire l'histoire’, in Annales ESC, July-Oct., 1992, n° 4–5, pp. 989–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgescu, Dakmara, L'enseignement secondaire en Roumanie, Strasbourg, Council of Europe 1996.Google Scholar
Jones, Anthony (ed.), Education and society in New Russia, NY, M Sharpe 1994.Google Scholar
'L'enseignement: un vaste chantier’, in Courrier des pays de l'Est, n° 1007, La Documentation Française 2000.Google Scholar
French Ministry of National Education, Colloque sur l'Histoire et son enseignement, 19-20-21 Jan. 1984, Montpellier, MEN 1984.Google Scholar
Moniot, Henri (ed.), Enseigner l'histoire. Des manuels à la mémoire, Berne, Frankfurt, Nancy, NY, Peter Lang 1984.Google Scholar
Moniot, Henri and Servanski, Maciev (eds), L'Histoire et ses fonctions. Une pensée et ses pratiques, Paris, L'Harmattan 2000.Google Scholar
Oecd, , Review of National Policies for Education: Poland, OECD, 1996.Google Scholar
Oecd, Review of National Policies for Education: Romania, OCDE, 2000.Google Scholar
Oecd, Review of National Policies for Education: The Czech Republic, OCDE, 1996.Google Scholar
Recommendation n° 1283 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the CE, 1996, http://stars.coe.fr/ta/ta96/frec1283.htm. Unesco, Être historien aujourd'hui, papers from a conference in Nice, 24-27 February 1986, Unesco 1988.Google Scholar
Transcripts of Sessions of Parliament and of the Commission on Education, Science, Youth and Sport, Chamber of Deputies of Romania, http://www.cdep.ro.Google Scholar