Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T06:55:30.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The of the Earth Goddess Among the Magar of Nepal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Extract

The military conquest of the Magarant, the Magar land, took place during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when the Thakuri petty kings and their dependents (priests, artisans, soldiers) fled India to settle there. The Magar resistance appears to have been weak, due to their lack of unity and the alliances the conquerors formed with some of them. The Magar people quickly opted for assimilation into the royal caste of the Thakuri, adopting most of their cultural traits, notably their language and religion. Nevertheless they retained or developed particularisms in their relationship to the earth, as we can see in the rites they devote to Bhume. We should emphasize first and foremost that the name Bhume is itself Nepalese, derived from the sanskrit bhû, bhûmî. This goddess is neglected by the Hindi of high caste, whereas she is central to the Magar. This paradox has two possible sources: the Magar might have identified one of their principal goddesses with a minor Hindu deity by virtue of a common relation to the earth, conferring an unusual importance on the latter. Or they might have constructed a divine being on the basis of Hindu concepts, as the result of a new-found need to defend their rights to the earth in the face of the Hindu invaders. The second hypothesis seems more likely, since there is no trace of a Magar earth goddess before Bhume. Even in the regions where the Magar retained the use of their original language (such as in Palpa, Syangja, or in the Kham country) and where, consequently, some of the gods have Magar names, the earth goddess is called by Nepalese terms, such as Bhume, Bhuyar, or Bhayar. Furthermore, even if the Magar themselves once had an earth goddess of their own, the renaming of this deity would indicate a change of identity, given the importance of a divinity's name.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

Quite often a new plough is put through a little ritual before its first use. Similarly, during the Tihar feast, the plough is the only farm implement that is being venerated. It is decorated with a flower wreath and a tika good-luck tag; in the Sallyan, Rolpa and Jajarkot regions the masters of the house take off the plough-share and fill the slade slot with rice.Google Scholar
de Sales, A., Je suis né de vos jeux de tambours, Nanterre, 1991, p. 93.Google Scholar
See Oppitz, M., Frau für Fron, Frankfurt, 1988.Google Scholar
Kawakita, J., The Hills Magars and Their Neighbours, Tokyo, 1974, p. 345. To relativize this statement it should be noted that the thum comprise lands of very different sizes depending on the region. In Gulmi they are very large and correspond to those of the ancient kingdoms, and perhaps this explains why they do not have the same rituals.Google Scholar
A. de Sales (note 2 above).Google Scholar
Kawakita, J. (note 4 above), p. 369.Google Scholar
At the village level, the reforms of the Panchayats involved a rearrangement of the ancient lands of the mukhiya chiefs into larger areas called Gaun Panchayat. Moreover, a person elected by means of the universal suffrage (the Prandhan) replaced the traditional village chiefs whose authority was hereditary.Google Scholar
Lecomte-Tilouine, M., “About Bhume. A Misunderstanding in the Himalayas,” in: G. Toffin (ed.), Nepal. Past and Present, Paris, 1993, pp. 127–34.Google Scholar
If the authority of the king in the territories he controlled militarily was not being challenged, his possession of land put him among the Brahmins in Indian history. According to Singh, R.C.P. (Kingship in Northern India, New Delhi, 1968, pp. 101–10), the Visvakarman Bhauvana myth offers a Brahmin representation of the land that stood opposite to the pretensions of the king.Google Scholar
Naraharinath, Y. (ed.), Gorkha Vamshavali, Benares, p. 101.Google Scholar
Sagant, Ph., “Le double pouvoir chez les Yakhthumba,” in: Krauskopff, G. and Lecomte-Tilouine, M. (eds.), Célébrer le pouvoir. Dasain, une fête royale au Népal, Paris, 1996.Google Scholar